| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 151 | Jerry Bateman | I totaly opose this development due to the envronmental impact to Stanground |
| 152 | Jerry Bateman | I totaly opose this development due to the envronmental impact to Stanground |
| 153 | Jerry Bateman | I totaly opose this development due to the envronmental impact to Stanground |
| 154 | Jerry Bateman | I am totally oposed to this development due to the unacceptable impact to the envronment to Stanground |
| 155 | Jason Cox | |
| 156 | Rachel Wood | |
| 157 | Anonymous | |
| 158 | allan biddle | Industry should be kept well away from home |
| 159 | Anonymous | |
| 160 | Anonymous | The Gazeley Magna Park will ruin the view across Horsey Toll and Whittlesey. This is a one way thing, once it is built, that view is gone forever, so we must fight against it and be sure to let ther be no doubt that our community is against it. |
| 161 | Anonymous | This devlopment must not be allowed in Stanground as it will ruin the safe residential areas surrounding it. |
| 162 | Anonymous | This is an inappropriate development so close to resendential accomodation and will undermine the peace and quiet amenity enjoyed by Park Farm residents. We need quality jobs in Peterborough, not more warehouses. |
| 163 | Anonymous | Was planning to retire here in Park Farm since it is a nice peaceful and quiet neighbourhood. If this or anything similar goes ahead will have to start looking elsewhere.
I resent the idea of undermining our local environment for the benefit of the businesses which are part of this scheme.
There is plenty of vacant land and run-down industrial property in Peterborough well away from resedential housing. Much of this is an eyesore anyway and would benefit from such a development. |
| 164 | Rebecca Hunter | |
| 165 | Anonymous | Will lead to more immigration and not local jobs. Will further lower average wage in Peterborough. |
| 166 | Peter Slinger RIBA | Warehouse schemes provide very few jobs compared with industrial, light industrial or commercial uses. Below are the employment densities that were applied by ARUP for the Integrated Growth Study (IGS). These were taken from the English Partnership guidance for 'general purpose built offices' and general industrial buildings. The densities in the EP guidance strictly
relate to employment places, which is broadly equivalent to full time equivalent (FTE) jobs.
Employment Densities
Land Use Class Employment Density
B1 Office 19 square metres per worker (gross internal floorspace)
B2 General Industry 37 square metres per worker (gross internal
floorspace)
B8 Warehousing 90 square metres (gross internal floorspace)
From this it is clear that the claim to be creating significant jobs is not a convincing one.
The development fundamentally damages the way the City Centre relates to its hinterland and permanently destroys the green wedge that runs through the city from ferry meadows to the fens.
This scheme is being sold as environmentally attractive as it is served by the railway. There are no garentees that this will be the case once permission is granted. Both the IKEA and Debenhams warehouses were positioned next to the East Coast main line and there is no proposal to actually connect them. If the proposal was to be connected to rail, the noise and disturbance through the night would be intollerable. This kind of use needs to be remote from settlements. |
| 167 | Peter Slinger RIBA | Warehouse schemes provide very few jobs compared with industrial, light industrial or commercial uses. Below are the employment densities that were applied by ARUP for the Integrated Growth Study (IGS). These were taken from the English Partnership guidance for 'general purpose built offices' and general industrial buildings. The densities in the EP guidance strictly
relate to employment places, which is broadly equivalent to full time equivalent (FTE) jobs.
Employment Densities
Land Use Class Employment Density
B1 Office 19 square metres per worker (gross internal floorspace)
B2 General Industry 37 square metres per worker (gross internal
floorspace)
B8 Warehousing 90 square metres (gross internal floorspace)
From this it is clear that the claim to be creating significant jobs is not a convincing one.
The development fundamentally damages the way the City Centre relates to its hinterland and permanently destroys the green wedge that runs through the city from ferry meadows to the fens.
This scheme is being sold as environmentally attractive as it is served by the railway. There are no garentees that this will be the case once permission is granted. Both the IKEA and Debenhams warehouses were positioned next to the East Coast main line and there is no proposal to actually connect them. If the proposal was to be connected to rail, the noise and disturbance through the night would be intollerable. This kind of use needs to be remote from settlements. |
| 168 | Mike Nicholls | It will damage the environment, it wil light the sky up at night , it will strongly effect the community and the
price of property. |
| 169 | alison loughton | |
| 170 | Mr J Foster | Hell NO! |
| 171 | louisa munton-hague | |
| 172 | Anonymous | |
| 173 | Anonymous | We need to preserve our countryside, the wildlife in it . We are also entitled to the peace, quiet and country views we chose when we settled in Stanground. |
| 174 | Anonymous | I live in Whittlesey and i think it is ridiculous!!!
LEAVE THE FIELD ALONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! you profiteering uncaring opportunists. |
| 175 | Subash | Magna Park will affect life negatively in Stanground. It must not be situated in the current location. We must stop the mega corporations and corrupted politicians ramming this down our throat |
| 176 | Anonymous | I WILL MOVE IF THIS HAPPENS!!! |
| 177 | Anonymous | Due to imports exceeding exports & supplyers not wanting to pay for carriage of empty boxes the only way to dispose of them is cut up & sold as scrap metal.
Trust that will not take place here! |
| 178 | Paul Chippington | I agree that we need jobs in the city, but this is not the area without the infastructure to support such a warehouse development. Not to mention when completed, jobs would be minimal as modern warehouses are run on minimal employees. |
| 179 | Karen Scott | Parents still live in park Farm and have done since early60's I grew up there as well, this would destroy park farm |
| 180 | emma | Surely there has to be other spaces in Peterborough away from residential areas that are more suitable for this sort of developement? |
| 181 | Anonymous | |
| 182 | P Broom | There are enough vacant sites in Peterborough that Magna Park could fit nicely into. This is not an industrial area. Gazeley have the capital to renovate somewhere - anywhere in Peterborough would provide good rail links, anywhere industrial! Gazeley, you are keen to be good neighbours, but we don't want noisy neighbours. Be environmentally friendly, let us keep the greenery. Are we going to have to buy masts to erect our TV aerials on - what with these buildings one side, and Ikea on the other. Will they pay for the costs of such stupid measures needed to warrant the TV licence that we can never escape from. |
| 183 | Dean Duffield | I believe this development, due to it's magnitude will not only have a negative impact on it's immediate neighbours but Peterborough as a whole. |
| 184 | Dean Duffield | I believe this development, due to it's magnitude will not only have a negative impact on it's immediate neighbours but Peterborough as a whole. |
| 185 | Anonymous | |
| 186 | Anonymous | |
| 187 | Anonymous | |
| 188 | Anonymous | |
| 189 | Anonymous | |
| 190 | Anonymous | |
| 191 | Helen Brand | |
| 192 | Mr. Robert H. BROWN ~ (UKIP PPC for NW CAMBS.) | I'm supporting your campaign to say NO to Gazeley's Magna Park Industrial Developements. I have every intentions of attending the Public Meeting you are planning for the 23rd of July. We need to stop this Labour Government covering the British Isles in their two favourite colours ... Concrete & Tarmac. Chris York is right in saying we need to think a lot more of the future generations bearing in mind what are forefathers have worked so hard for in times past. Why should we allow the three main political parties to freely give away our once great nation ... Please wake-up my fellow countrymen ... STOP SLEEP WALKING INTO DICTATORSHIP ... TAKE BACK RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL OF YOUR OWN FUTURE.... STAND UP FOR WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN AND DO WHAT IS RIGHT ... SUPPORT THE RESIDENTS OF STANGROUND> LET'S SHOW GB WHAT PEOPLE POWER REALLY IS ! I look forward to seeing lots of the local residents at this meeting which I believe will be starting at 7PM. |
| 193 | Maarten Verkiel | |
| 194 | jason newberry | |
| 195 | w rigby | NO to Gazeley magna park |
| 196 | Anonymous | |
| 197 | Anonymous | |
| 198 | Stacey | It already takes ages in the morning to get anywhere out of stanground- if they go ahead with the development it is going to take even longer, with all the building workers and people that will eventually work there. Not to mention it will be an eyesore and damaging to the enviroment. |
| 199 | Jan Hamilton | Living immediately next to the proposed development, we are fully against any developments spoiling our countryside and peace and quite, especially when there are plenty of open spaces where they could build where it would disturb and destroy residence peace and view. |
| 200 | Mark Hamilton | Peterborough is already a city where all we seem to get is industry and hugh warehouse developments. WE DO NOT WANT IT ON OUR DOORSTOP. WILL THEY COMPENSATE US FOR THE LOSS OF VALUE ON OUR HOUSE DUE TO LIVING DIRECTLY NEAR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, I SERIOUSLY DOUBT THEY EVEN CARE |