| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 101 | Julie Walker | |
| 102 | George Walker | |
| 103 | James Walker | |
| 104 | NICHOLA RUSSELL | I think that the proposition will be a blot on the landscape and if the bypass is not sorted before it starts then the traffic congestion will be appauling |
| 105 | Anonymous | I think that the proposition will be a blot on the landscape and if the bypass is not sorted before it starts then the traffic congestion will be appauling |
| 106 | Graham Murdoch | |
| 107 | Jenny | Say No for definate |
| 108 | Rob Sotheron | I object to this on the gorunds of the environmental impact it will have, both on wildlife and also on the residents of Stanground and far beyond with increased traffic, light and noise pollution, the increased risk of flooding in the local area, need I go on??.......... |
| 109 | Anonymous | Strongly object to this development. |
| 110 | tracy brown | we are rapidly losing greenery in the surrounding areas, even on the GREEN WHEEL!! |
| 111 | ALAN NICHOLLS | |
| 112 | Will Clifton | |
| 113 | Fiona Garner | |
| 114 | Ian Donaldson | |
| 115 | Jane Merry | |
| 116 | Kyle Merry | |
| 117 | Danica Merry | |
| 118 | D Parr | |
| 119 | K Hall | |
| 120 | sharon Smith | |
| 121 | iva biggins | do you not understand the word NO! |
| 122 | Chris Garner | |
| 123 | Anonymous | |
| 124 | Paul Bellinger | I bought my house on Park Farm because it was a quiet estate on the edge of the built up area, looking out onto open space. I do not want that taken away from me and my family. |
| 125 | Anonymous | WE BOUGHT THIS HOUSE WITH AN OPEN OUTLOOK,BUT AS WITH ALL COUNCIL PLANNING IN PETERBOROUGH ,IT WILL BE PUSHED THROUGH AND NO MATTER WHAT WE SAY IT WILL BE BUILT.HENCE THE FLATS AT THE END OF BELTON ROAD ,THE PRISON ETC ETC.I HAVE NEVER KNOWN SUCH A CORRUPT COUNCIL |
| 126 | Anonymous | |
| 127 | Morris Parmenter | i was under the impression that the area was going to be used by the brick works as a new pit |
| 128 | KELLY LYNCH | |
| 129 | ben rollings | |
| 130 | Anonymous | scrap monstrous development |
| 131 | LISA KEAREY | |
| 132 | Peter Miler | I live at 113 kings delph. As it is now the lorrys shake our houses as they go past. Something has to be done, but can we fight the big boys. They say its progress. They also say it is going to mean hundreds of jobs. What they should say is hundreds of Polish jobs, our own lads and lasses won't get a look in. |
| 133 | R B Wizner | |
| 134 | K Wizner | |
| 135 | Mark Duckworth | |
| 136 | Linda Coultrup | |
| 137 | Francis Lloyd | I purchased my house because it overlooked the countryside and love listening and watching all the wildlife during the evening. I didn't move here to overlook warehousing, lights and noise 24/7!
The proposed site is a flood plain - so wheres the extra rain water going to go ? I quess Park Farm |
| 138 | mark bedford | Boot this stupid proposal out! We do NOT want this on our door step. I like all other people who attended the Town Hall Public meeting, support our local Councilor's in supporting the action group (apart from Wilkinson!). Good work! |
| 139 | Lina Killick | I am totally opposed to this. Even with a bypass Stanground will not be able to cope with the traffic on the roads. I suggest that the developers spend a week during term time travelling to the city centre from stanground. |
| 140 | Simon Potter | The council should concentrate on bringing decent high-skilled jobs here instead!
Stanground doesn't need this eyesore |
| 141 | Joy Powell | The noise; the large amount of extra heavy traffic; persons using our roads as short-cuts bacj to town; and a big eye-sore. Get a by-pass built and maybe the traffic nuisance would be less. |
| 142 | Anonymous | |
| 143 | Bill Taylor | |
| 144 | Anonymous | |
| 145 | Mr. Adler | |
| 146 | Anonymous | |
| 147 | richard moulton | |
| 148 | graham hope | The continued destruction of more and more green belt land for housing is bad enough, to do so for warehousing is preposterous.
Keep saying No |
| 149 | Elaine Harrison | |
| 150 | steve harris | is there any need for a comment.....just looking at the plans was enough to see that park farm does not need an industrial site thankyou very much. |