Powered by iPetitions - start your online petition now

 

Signatures | Total: 209

 

# NameComments
101 Julie Walker
102 George Walker
103 James Walker
104 NICHOLA RUSSELLI think that the proposition will be a blot on the landscape and if the bypass is not sorted before it starts then the traffic congestion will be appauling
105 AnonymousI think that the proposition will be a blot on the landscape and if the bypass is not sorted before it starts then the traffic congestion will be appauling
106 Graham Murdoch
107 JennySay No for definate
108 Rob SotheronI object to this on the gorunds of the environmental impact it will have, both on wildlife and also on the residents of Stanground and far beyond with increased traffic, light and noise pollution, the increased risk of flooding in the local area, need I go on??..........
109 AnonymousStrongly object to this development.
110 tracy brownwe are rapidly losing greenery in the surrounding areas, even on the GREEN WHEEL!!
111 ALAN NICHOLLS
112 Will Clifton
113 Fiona Garner
114 Ian Donaldson
115 Jane Merry
116 Kyle Merry
117 Danica Merry
118 D Parr
119 K Hall
120 sharon Smith
121 iva bigginsdo you not understand the word NO!
122 Chris Garner
123 Anonymous
124 Paul BellingerI bought my house on Park Farm because it was a quiet estate on the edge of the built up area, looking out onto open space. I do not want that taken away from me and my family.
125 AnonymousWE BOUGHT THIS HOUSE WITH AN OPEN OUTLOOK,BUT AS WITH ALL COUNCIL PLANNING IN PETERBOROUGH ,IT WILL BE PUSHED THROUGH AND NO MATTER WHAT WE SAY IT WILL BE BUILT.HENCE THE FLATS AT THE END OF BELTON ROAD ,THE PRISON ETC ETC.I HAVE NEVER KNOWN SUCH A CORRUPT COUNCIL
126 Anonymous
127 Morris Parmenteri was under the impression that the area was going to be used by the brick works as a new pit
128 KELLY LYNCH
129 ben rollings
130 Anonymousscrap monstrous development
131 LISA KEAREY
132 Peter MilerI live at 113 kings delph. As it is now the lorrys shake our houses as they go past. Something has to be done, but can we fight the big boys. They say its progress. They also say it is going to mean hundreds of jobs. What they should say is hundreds of Polish jobs, our own lads and lasses won't get a look in.
133 R B Wizner
134 K Wizner
135 Mark Duckworth
136 Linda Coultrup
137 Francis LloydI purchased my house because it overlooked the countryside and love listening and watching all the wildlife during the evening. I didn't move here to overlook warehousing, lights and noise 24/7! The proposed site is a flood plain - so wheres the extra rain water going to go ? I quess Park Farm
138 mark bedfordBoot this stupid proposal out! We do NOT want this on our door step. I like all other people who attended the Town Hall Public meeting, support our local Councilor's in supporting the action group (apart from Wilkinson!). Good work!
139 Lina KillickI am totally opposed to this. Even with a bypass Stanground will not be able to cope with the traffic on the roads. I suggest that the developers spend a week during term time travelling to the city centre from stanground.
140 Simon PotterThe council should concentrate on bringing decent high-skilled jobs here instead! Stanground doesn't need this eyesore
141 Joy PowellThe noise; the large amount of extra heavy traffic; persons using our roads as short-cuts bacj to town; and a big eye-sore. Get a by-pass built and maybe the traffic nuisance would be less.
142 Anonymous
143 Bill Taylor
144 Anonymous
145 Mr. Adler
146 Anonymous
147 richard moulton
148 graham hopeThe continued destruction of more and more green belt land for housing is bad enough, to do so for warehousing is preposterous. Keep saying No
149 Elaine Harrison
150 steve harrisis there any need for a comment.....just looking at the plans was enough to see that park farm does not need an industrial site thankyou very much.

 

Signatures | Total: 209