Signatures 873 total
-
1
Name: Isaac Brody on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Matt Hoffman on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Soroush Shahrokni on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Ian Thompson on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Marco Sanasi on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Anthony Allen on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Philip Bloom on Jun 3, 2009Comments: As a user of the camera for a few weeks last month I completely agree.Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Jason Adams on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Kim Wang on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Ddavey on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Jason Olsan on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Stu Maschwitz on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Michael Bodalski on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Ruben Rodas on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Jun 3, 2009Comments: Yes Please!Flag
-
17
Name: Michael James on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Dan Dobi on Jun 3, 2009Comments: I agree fully and would BUY this camera in a heartbeat if these changes were made! - www.dandobi.comFlag
-
19
Name: Paul Del Vecchio on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Eric Escobar on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Richard Smither on Jun 3, 2009Comments: The breakup in 1080 24p has stopped me from buying this camera after having put down a deposit with the strong intention to buy. If you can fix this in the next 4 weeks I think the camera could sell lots of units. If you delay something else will come along and steal the thunder... Act swiftlyFlag
-
22
Name: John Palaganas on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Brunet Nicolas on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Nigel Tharpe on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Scott Karlins on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Frank Jonen on Jun 3, 2009Comments: Given the hardware specs of the GH1 a AVCHD bit rate of up to 40Mbps should be possible. The lack of b-frames however in not explainable at all.Flag
-
27
Name: Alister Robbie on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Brad Johnson on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
29
Name: Paul Reynolds on Jun 3, 2009Comments: Please tract the recording limits.Flag
-
30
Name: Evan Zissimopulos on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Neal Buconjic on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Brett Noe on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Anonymous on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Jason DIamond on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Richard Squires on Jun 3, 2009Comments: This camera is going to blow the semi pro and pro market wide open. The camera seems to good to be true. Perhaps your testing the water and a more expensive pro oner will emergeFlag
-
36
Name: Chris Paul on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: James Bresnahan on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Dustin Siniard on Jun 3, 2009Comments: Please doit, I want this camera sooooooo badFlag
-
39
Name: Andre Galic on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Jun 3, 2009Comments: The breakup in the 1080/24 is killer for me. If you guys can fix that and employ live output, this would be the killer camera for my needs and a lot of others!Flag
-
41
Name: Albert on Jun 3, 2009Comments: I agree to improve the 1080 24P with no break ups during heavy panningFlag
-
42
Name: Gianze Perez on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Benji Newell on Jun 3, 2009Comments: I would buy this camera if these features were implemented. Period.Flag
-
44
Name: Dalton Boettcher on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Joe Shaw on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Gabriel Soares on Jun 3, 2009Comments: Nice features brings more sales...Flag
-
47
Name: Mark Parber on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Ricardo Claper on Jun 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Anonymous on Jun 4, 2009Comments: please make this happen!Flag
-
50
Name: Corbyn Tyson on Jun 4, 2009Comments: Well said!Flag