Signatures 460 total
Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 › »
-
151
Name: Josep Alemany on Oct 18, 2007Comments: The LotusPartners (the people who sell your products) need the RedBooks to have technical information and develop products better than competitos. If you close them, you can lost one of the bests values to choose IBM...Flag
-
152
Name: Brunella Di Silvestro on Oct 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
153
Name: Tine Wagner on Oct 22, 2007Comments:Flag
-
154
Name: Fiou on Oct 23, 2007Comments:Flag
-
155
Name: Drew Slothower on Oct 24, 2007Comments:Flag
-
156
Name: Anonymous on Oct 25, 2007Comments:Flag
-
157
Name: Andrea Malagnini on Oct 26, 2007Comments: Continue the RedBooks !!!!! --- Please !!!!Flag
-
158
Name: Anonymous on Oct 29, 2007Comments: Save the Redbooks!!!!!!Flag
-
159
Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007Comments:Flag
-
160
Name: Marcin Krawczyk on Nov 6, 2007Comments:Flag
-
161
Name: Diron Melton on Nov 7, 2007Comments: Redbooks are so important for IBM products.Flag
-
162
Name: Harald Gaerttner on Nov 13, 2007Comments:Flag
-
163
Name: Pete McPhedran on Nov 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
164
Name: Erik Brooks on Nov 16, 2007Comments: The Redbooks are invaluable to our organization. Their combination of high-level approach down through low-level applcation with screenshots are crucial for complex integration of new technology. E.g. Without Redbooks we would *not* be running Websphere with Domino -- we would be running Tomcat or another servlet manager.Flag
-
165
Name: Sudhir on Nov 16, 2007Comments: Redbooks, the best resources for Lotus on the netFlag
-
166
Name: Ronald Portier on Nov 16, 2007Comments: Redbooks through the years have been my most valuable information not only for Notes/Domino, but also for iSeries and WebSphere implementation. Once again IBM is on suicide track by saving a little money through taking away a valuable service. Like they did when customer engineers (CE's - are they still remembered) were abolished. Or in crippling systems like iSeries for market segmentation purposes.Flag
-
167
Name: Peter Wilson on Nov 18, 2007Comments: Don't be crazy IBM....how about reducing stock options for all those executives first !Flag
-
168
Name: Jens-B. Augustiny on Nov 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
169
Name: Peter Wilson on Nov 18, 2007Comments: IBM...don't do it !Flag
-
170
Name: Julie Castle on Nov 19, 2007Comments: Wikis and similar are just not the same as a book that was created by a team with time to fully dedicate themselves to proper testing and thorough documentation of the software. Customers still want to be able to read a book, and it also shows customers that IBM is committed to the Lotus brand.Flag
-
171
Name: Michael Stokes on Nov 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
172
Name: Michael Lucchese on Nov 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
173
Name: Anonymous on Nov 19, 2007Comments: Support the community. Keep Redbooks alive.Flag
-
174
Name: Glenn Moutrey on Nov 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
175
Name: Michael Dyson on Nov 19, 2007Comments: I know of too many projects that would have failed or at the least, they would have suffered greatly if it wasn't for Redbooks. Together with the many customers I have worked with, I have relied upon the deep knowledge that can only come after the many numerous brainstorms and testing labs that are behind the creation of a Redbook.Flag
-
176
Name: Rishab Sharma on Nov 19, 2007Comments: Would be shame if this true. Redbooks are a wonderful way of sharing collective knowledge gained. I was always looked at Redbooks since they provide more information and better illustration than documentation does.Flag
-
177
Name: Corey Davis on Nov 20, 2007Comments: Redbooks have been a valuable assest to my co-workers and I over the years. It is baffeling to me that IBM would choose to go this route just as they release one of the most extreme changes to the Notes framework. I would imagine that the demand for ND8 Redbooks would be at an all time high compared to other releases of ND.Flag
-
178
Name: Erik Schwalb on Nov 20, 2007Comments:Flag
-
179
Name: Jeroen Keet on Nov 21, 2007Comments:Flag
-
180
Name: David Harris on Nov 22, 2007Comments: I wholeheartedly agree - the Lotus Redbooks are absolutely invaluable to me and my colleagues, especially when we're venturing out of our comfort zones.Flag
-
181
Name: Nigel Davies on Nov 23, 2007Comments: I am a Lotus Premium Support Manager (PSM). My customer, Hewlett Packard, uses every relevant Lotus Redbook as a guide with any new deployment, upgrade and so on. As their PSM, the Redbooks save me having to do a tremendous amount of testing and answering of "how to" questions.Flag
-
182
Name: Bill Kron on Nov 25, 2007Comments:Flag
-
183
Name: Stuart Hickson on Nov 25, 2007Comments: Although other technologies have been advanced by IBM Lotus as the future of detailed design and implementation guides for Lotus products, I strongly believe that Lotus Redbooks are a crucial and trusted resource for customers and IBMer's alike.Flag
-
184
Name: Stacy Lieder on Nov 25, 2007Comments: Lotus Redbooks are an invaluable resource. Wikis have their place, but one-stop-shop documents that show a soup-to-nuts approach to deploying Lotus Technologies.Flag
-
185
Name: Frank Nostrame on Nov 26, 2007Comments: I couldn't agree more. As a two time Lotus Redbook author, I've received firsthand customer testimonials stating that Redbooks provide insight into the Lotus products that can not be obtained from technical writers of the "Help" documentation, who do not always have real-world experience with the product. In addition, product documentation that comes from "social" avenues like Wikis and Blogs are often incomplete and can not always be confirmed as a credible source of information. The collective experience of a Redbooks team, the Redbooks team leaders and the backing of IBM Lotus has made Lotus Redbooks a reliable source of Lotus product information and I support the continuation of the Lotus ITSO lab.Flag
-
186
Name: Patrick Kwinten on Nov 27, 2007Comments: we need those information!Flag
-
187
Name: Brian Jamieson on Nov 27, 2007Comments: What might you propose to replace the Redbooks with Please don't say the info centre. The Redbooks have always offered a cohesive picture of how to use these (non-trivial) products.Flag
-
188
Name: Bastian Wieczorek on Nov 27, 2007Comments: I vote for it :-)Flag
-
189
Name: Armin Auth on Nov 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
190
Name: Uwe Brahm on Nov 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
191
Name: Michael Poetzsche on Nov 27, 2007Comments: I always considered the Redbooks as an BIG competitive advantage for IBM !Flag
-
192
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
193
Name: Wolfgang M. Schwerber on Nov 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
194
Name: Andy Brunner on Nov 27, 2007Comments: As an IBM teacher for Lotus products, I certainly need these redbooks !Flag
-
195
Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
196
Name: Simon Watmough on Nov 27, 2007Comments: It will make it much more difficult to do my job without the invaluable assistance of Lotus Redbooks. and will possibly delay the installation of Notes/Domino 8, Sametime 8 and Quickr in my customer sitesFlag
-
197
Name: Christian Zalto on Nov 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
198
Name: Charles Robinson on Nov 27, 2007Comments: We need more information, not less.Flag
-
199
Name: Kirk Kuykendall on Nov 27, 2007Comments:Flag
-
200
Name: Helmut Weiss on Nov 27, 2007Comments: Lotus Redbooks are the best source for expert information around!Flag