Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 460 total

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 »

  1. 151
    Name: Josep Alemany on Oct 18, 2007
    Comments: The LotusPartners (the people who sell your products) need the RedBooks to have technical information and develop products better than competitos. If you close them, you can lost one of the bests values to choose IBM...
    Flag
  2. 152
    Name: Brunella Di Silvestro on Oct 19, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 153
    Name: Tine Wagner on Oct 22, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 154
    Name: Fiou on Oct 23, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 155
    Name: Drew Slothower on Oct 24, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 156
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 25, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 157
    Name: Andrea Malagnini on Oct 26, 2007
    Comments: Continue the RedBooks !!!!! --- Please !!!!
    Flag
  8. 158
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 29, 2007
    Comments: Save the Redbooks!!!!!!
    Flag
  9. 159
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 2, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 160
    Name: Marcin Krawczyk on Nov 6, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 161
    Name: Diron Melton on Nov 7, 2007
    Comments: Redbooks are so important for IBM products.
    Flag
  12. 162
    Name: Harald Gaerttner on Nov 13, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 163
    Name: Pete McPhedran on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 164
    Name: Erik Brooks on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments: The Redbooks are invaluable to our organization. Their combination of high-level approach down through low-level applcation with screenshots are crucial for complex integration of new technology. E.g. Without Redbooks we would *not* be running Websphere with Domino -- we would be running Tomcat or another servlet manager.
    Flag
  15. 165
    Name: Sudhir on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments: Redbooks, the best resources for Lotus on the net
    Flag
  16. 166
    Name: Ronald Portier on Nov 16, 2007
    Comments: Redbooks through the years have been my most valuable information not only for Notes/Domino, but also for iSeries and WebSphere implementation. Once again IBM is on suicide track by saving a little money through taking away a valuable service. Like they did when customer engineers (CE's - are they still remembered) were abolished. Or in crippling systems like iSeries for market segmentation purposes.
    Flag
  17. 167
    Name: Peter Wilson on Nov 18, 2007
    Comments: Don't be crazy IBM....how about reducing stock options for all those executives first !
    Flag
  18. 168
    Name: Jens-B. Augustiny on Nov 18, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 169
    Name: Peter Wilson on Nov 18, 2007
    Comments: IBM...don't do it !
    Flag
  20. 170
    Name: Julie Castle on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments: Wikis and similar are just not the same as a book that was created by a team with time to fully dedicate themselves to proper testing and thorough documentation of the software. Customers still want to be able to read a book, and it also shows customers that IBM is committed to the Lotus brand.
    Flag
  21. 171
    Name: Michael Stokes on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 172
    Name: Michael Lucchese on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 173
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments: Support the community. Keep Redbooks alive.
    Flag
  24. 174
    Name: Glenn Moutrey on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 175
    Name: Michael Dyson on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments: I know of too many projects that would have failed or at the least, they would have suffered greatly if it wasn't for Redbooks. Together with the many customers I have worked with, I have relied upon the deep knowledge that can only come after the many numerous brainstorms and testing labs that are behind the creation of a Redbook.
    Flag
  26. 176
    Name: Rishab Sharma on Nov 19, 2007
    Comments: Would be shame if this true. Redbooks are a wonderful way of sharing collective knowledge gained. I was always looked at Redbooks since they provide more information and better illustration than documentation does.
    Flag
  27. 177
    Name: Corey Davis on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments: Redbooks have been a valuable assest to my co-workers and I over the years. It is baffeling to me that IBM would choose to go this route just as they release one of the most extreme changes to the Notes framework. I would imagine that the demand for ND8 Redbooks would be at an all time high compared to other releases of ND.
    Flag
  28. 178
    Name: Erik Schwalb on Nov 20, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 179
    Name: Jeroen Keet on Nov 21, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 180
    Name: David Harris on Nov 22, 2007
    Comments: I wholeheartedly agree - the Lotus Redbooks are absolutely invaluable to me and my colleagues, especially when we're venturing out of our comfort zones.
    Flag
  31. 181
    Name: Nigel Davies on Nov 23, 2007
    Comments: I am a Lotus Premium Support Manager (PSM). My customer, Hewlett Packard, uses every relevant Lotus Redbook as a guide with any new deployment, upgrade and so on. As their PSM, the Redbooks save me having to do a tremendous amount of testing and answering of "how to" questions.
    Flag
  32. 182
    Name: Bill Kron on Nov 25, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 183
    Name: Stuart Hickson on Nov 25, 2007
    Comments: Although other technologies have been advanced by IBM Lotus as the future of detailed design and implementation guides for Lotus products, I strongly believe that Lotus Redbooks are a crucial and trusted resource for customers and IBMer's alike.
    Flag
  34. 184
    Name: Stacy Lieder on Nov 25, 2007
    Comments: Lotus Redbooks are an invaluable resource. Wikis have their place, but one-stop-shop documents that show a soup-to-nuts approach to deploying Lotus Technologies.
    Flag
  35. 185
    Name: Frank Nostrame on Nov 26, 2007
    Comments: I couldn't agree more. As a two time Lotus Redbook author, I've received firsthand customer testimonials stating that Redbooks provide insight into the Lotus products that can not be obtained from technical writers of the "Help" documentation, who do not always have real-world experience with the product. In addition, product documentation that comes from "social" avenues like Wikis and Blogs are often incomplete and can not always be confirmed as a credible source of information. The collective experience of a Redbooks team, the Redbooks team leaders and the backing of IBM Lotus has made Lotus Redbooks a reliable source of Lotus product information and I support the continuation of the Lotus ITSO lab.
    Flag
  36. 186
    Name: Patrick Kwinten on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: we need those information!
    Flag
  37. 187
    Name: Brian Jamieson on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: What might you propose to replace the Redbooks with Please don't say the info centre. The Redbooks have always offered a cohesive picture of how to use these (non-trivial) products.
    Flag
  38. 188
    Name: Bastian Wieczorek on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: I vote for it :-)
    Flag
  39. 189
    Name: Armin Auth on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 190
    Name: Uwe Brahm on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 191
    Name: Michael Poetzsche on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: I always considered the Redbooks as an BIG competitive advantage for IBM !
    Flag
  42. 192
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 193
    Name: Wolfgang M. Schwerber on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 194
    Name: Andy Brunner on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: As an IBM teacher for Lotus products, I certainly need these redbooks !
    Flag
  45. 195
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 196
    Name: Simon Watmough on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: It will make it much more difficult to do my job without the invaluable assistance of Lotus Redbooks. and will possibly delay the installation of Notes/Domino 8, Sametime 8 and Quickr in my customer sites
    Flag
  47. 197
    Name: Christian Zalto on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 198
    Name: Charles Robinson on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: We need more information, not less.
    Flag
  49. 199
    Name: Kirk Kuykendall on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 200
    Name: Helmut Weiss on Nov 27, 2007
    Comments: Lotus Redbooks are the best source for expert information around!
    Flag

Page: « 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 10 »

Sponsored links