IBM should continue to produce Lotus-focused Redbooks.

Signatures 460 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 10 › »

1. 101
   Name: Xdavi on Sep 27, 2007

   Comments: babbi

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Salvatore Lucania on Sep 27, 2007

   Comments: W Redbook

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Guido Marangoni on Sep 27, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Antonio Cavallari on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments: NON CHIUDETE PER FAVORE

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Nicola on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments: NOOOOO!!!

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Vincenzo Capponcelli on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: MIGUEL CALVO on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Giuseppe Balbi on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Alessandro Corti on Sep 28, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Mirko Checchetto on Sep 28, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: Save the Redbook

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Paula Dantas on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: It's a shame that Lotus has taken the decision of not producing redbooks anymore. This was a huge advantage we had against our competitors, an enourmous source of information for the community and a differentiator.

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Joachim Benkert on Sep 30, 2007

    Comments: Redbooks are very important for continuing information about IBM products and for me a professional support as a service provider.

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Roberto Dominoni on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: Please don't stop Lotus Redbook Project!!!

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Enrico Descloux on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Giorgio Dosi on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: please......

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Andrea Grigio on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Gabriele on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Fabian Robok on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: Please keep them coming. Redbooks have always been a great source for information in the past, and as software complexity is always increasing, the value of new Redbooks will only grow.

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Ermie on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments: Save the Redbook !!!

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Gianluigi on Oct 2, 2007

    Comments: Please, do not stop it. One picture is better than 1000 words.

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 2, 2007

    Comments: Don't do it! save the Redbooks

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 2, 2007

    Comments: Please!!!

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: AM Gapi on Oct 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Lubomir Cerny on Oct 3, 2007

    Comments: DO NOT close redbooks ! It is absolutely the best source of information of Notes products. I can survive closing Redbooks only if all PDF will be available for download (to save them locally on my company servers) or transferred to other sources (planned wikis).

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Andrea on Oct 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Paul Ryan on Oct 3, 2007

    Comments: Paul Ryan from Process Stream Technologies, one of the authors of the Redbook "Security Considerations for Notes/Domino 7"

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Matteo Briotto on Oct 4, 2007

    Comments: Please don't be silly !!!

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Jan Zalman on Oct 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Matteo Astolfi on Oct 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Kalos on Oct 5, 2007

    Comments: Please mantain RedBook

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Voytek Wicinski on Oct 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Miroslav Navratil on Oct 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Jens Reichardt on Oct 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Jan Krejcarek on Oct 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Andreas Schulte on Oct 10, 2007

    Comments: important for work with lotus software and for supporting customer and business partner in daily work

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Barbara Koch on Oct 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Matthias Schneider on Oct 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Luigi Zambotti on Oct 12, 2007

    Comments: Don't let Lotus focused Redbooks die ! They were and are useful help for Lotus programmers and administrators.

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 12, 2007

    Comments: .

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Ilario Lavina on Oct 13, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Simon Mottram on Oct 14, 2007

    Comments: Ridiculous, Redbooks are one of the few really valuable resources IBM provide that they didnt gank from someone else

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Simon Scullion on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments: I have regularly used them, and always refer my team and new developers to them in order to give them the best possible reference available. What hurts here is that this is a decision which is not officially communicated or discussed publically by IBM, something which completely goes against the grain of how they are making important decisions lately.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Anonymous on Oct 15, 2007

    Comments: I have used Redbooks extensively since R5 (been involved with Notes since R3 - Before Domino). The internship program and the information coming out of the books are invaluable to both myself and to my organization. Even if you only supply them electronically and no longer provide them hardcopy, please continue them.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Tonci Cobrnic on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Joel Greenwell on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments: I believe for IBM to remain competitave it must support the technical expertise responsible for implementing its solutions world wide. Redbooks is a key component for many individuals out there, and the variety of formats allows users to review the detail at their leisure. Need I mention what Microsoft offers to its advocates

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Niels J. Hansen on Oct 17, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 10 › »