Signatures 460 total
-
451
Name: Discount OEM Software on Mar 8, 2012Comments: xoAAxC Major thanks for the blog.Really looking forward to read more. Awesome.Flag
-
452
Name: Qkguknoxvis on May 21, 2012Comments: wy3Qnq zwfcghsriwwt, vamnncejsahi, rixexjqzmsky, http://yhlqtwchukex.com/Flag
-
453
Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2012Comments: A lot of thanks for every one of your hard work on this web page. Kim really likes managing internet research and it is easy to see why. Most of us notice all of the lively mode you create efficient tips and hints via the blog and as well boost participation from others on that content so our favorite child is without question understanding a whole lot. Enjoy the rest of the year. You're the one conducting a really good job. have cheaper wow po have cheaper wow poFlag
-
454
Name: Anonymous on Nov 6, 2012Comments: Great paintings! This is the kind of info that are meant to be shared around the web. Shame on the seek engines|Google} for not positioning this put up higher! Come on over and consult with my website . Thanks =) have cheaper buy wow gold have cheaper buy wow goldFlag
-
455
Name: Marla on Nov 30, 2012Comments: That sounds neat.Ts and Cs for reodobks do state that permission is required to save more than a few of these locally.This option may get around that issue, and be more helpful too.Flag
-
456
Name: Giuseppe on Dec 1, 2012Comments: Not being defensive, just ptnoniig out that while aspiring to the level of IBM Redbooks is commendable, it's really hard to do at our scale.We really do try to provide the best level of information we can to our field and customers (I write TRs for a living most of the top 10 technical reports on our external document library come from my group).We do have a couple of ex-IBM folks on our team and the Redbook production process is something that we don't (at least right now) have the manpower to produce.But you bet we are working on improving both our documentation (as you've pointed out previously) and our other technical information like TRs. Our TRs aren't supposed to be about selling products, they're supposed to be about providing useful information about a product or an aspect of our products. Sometimes that's best practices, sometimes it's a discussion of why you'd want to use a certain feature/product. We do try really hard to make them not be marketing documents we have scads of those that our marketing folks produce like any other tech company does.Flag
-
457
Name: Jassu on Dec 1, 2012Comments: I agree that Redbooks are a nice model. However, you've got to look at the size and focus of IBM vs. the size and focus of NetApp.Number of IBM global emoplyees: 399,409Number of NetApp global emoplyees: 9,760IBM sells mainframes, UNIX systems, x64 systems, storage, networking, global services, outsourcing, and god knows what else.NetApp sells storage.Just by our size and nature, we don't have the people or resources to publish really broad documents. By our nature we do have to focus on things that are specific to our technology and products.Our technical reports will focus on broader technologies and other products where we have to, specifically when we're talking about interoperation with other products and applications. But those are again, focused on how we interoperate, and not in a more general sense.Flag
-
458
Name: Juan on Dec 2, 2012Comments: Hey Roger, no need to be so defensive and I thoguht NetApp were more about more than storage; yes, you sell storage but I get the feeling that you want to be about more than that? I would say look at some of the EMC papers as well; some of them barely mention EMC stuff for a great majority of them. It can be more than about selling stuff, it can be about informing, engaging and giving back. And don't people keep trying to convince us that NetApp punch above their weight it's not all about size! Believe in Better', that's what I say .I've even got a perspex award which says that I do .do you believe?Flag
-
459
Name: Mahamed on Dec 2, 2012Comments: I am new to WESB and I am begginning a pcoejrt using WESB, which will involve producing and consuming web services using WESB. I expect needs to validate, enhance, enrich, log , dynamically route the messages as they flow through WESB. I want to read similar sample applications, scenerios, reccommended patterns to build applications using WESB. Can you please point me to the right reading materials? I appreciate your help on this.Flag
-
460
Name: Syed on Dec 2, 2012Comments: David, I recognise a lot in your post.Let me share a real and acutal story from the field for a international bank with the headquarters here in the Netherlands.For me it started about 1.5 years ago with the question from this customer with a huge infrastructure with multiple platforms and lot s of administrators. This customer wants to transform their infrastructure to a cloud.But it was not easy to find the right answers to define the right roadmap, so I started searching in all kinds of documentation. At one moment in time I found a slide in a presentation of IBM.It showed me IBM s Cloud Reference Architecture and the answers I needed.A highly virtualized environment managed via the Systems Management tool IBM Systems Director in combination with IBM Tivoli monitoring and other IBM Service management tools. Have to split my comment in two (to much characters)Flag