| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 351 | Christian | I would miss a big source of knowledge. |
| 352 | Markus Recklies | |
| 353 | Anonymous | I use Redbooks regularly and cannot believe IBM is getting rid of them. Call me old fashioned, but Blogs and Wiki's don't work for me... |
| 354 | Ron Kats | |
| 355 | Ralph | |
| 356 | Albin Theander | The redbooks provide a source of collected knowledge on IBM products, comparable to nothing else. Keep it free! |
| 357 | Bart Mutsaers | The redbooks teach you a lot of state of the art options for Domino. Keep it alive! |
| 358 | Martin Audley | |
| 359 | Victor Taranov | Redbooks are great source of knowledge! |
| 360 | Kirill Kirillov | |
| 361 | Rosemary Arce | |
| 362 | Mochamad James F | |
| 363 | Fabio Ricci | rbooks have always been an important resource for who, like me, had to install, configure and run software ( not only ibm) in eterogeneous evniroments. It would be a shame to stop having them available |
| 364 | Ravinder Dhaliwal | As a co-author of several Lotus Redbooks I agree whole heartedly that no longer publishing Lotus Redbooks will be severely detrimental for our customers, our brand and our business.
Whilst in the short term some money might be saved, in the long term no publishing Lotus Redbooks will cost us dearly.
Microsoft will certainly benefit from the every decreasing presence of Lotus in the marketplace. |
| 365 | Mohammed El Ouazzani | ITSO Redbooks are an essential aid for us. |
| 366 | William Ryken | I find the Redbooks very valuable for all Lotus products and services. |
| 367 | Alberto Miserendino | |
| 368 | sughosh kuntal | We want redbooks , We love redbooks |
| 369 | Jan Jørgensen | |
| 370 | Anonymous | |
| 371 | Anonymous | |
| 372 | Roy Rumaner | |
| 373 | Geoff Dutton | |
| 374 | Anonymous | this is so wrong decision |
| 375 | Wim Savenberg | |
| 376 | Marc Smith | GO LOTUS! |
| 377 | Anonymous | |
| 378 | Anonymous | |
| 379 | Olaf Pohl | |
| 380 | Anonymous | |
| 381 | Carsten Jenn | |
| 382 | Wolfgang Plenker | |
| 383 | Axel Huth | |
| 384 | Anonymous | |
| 385 | Anonymous | |
| 386 | Neil Gower | I rely on Redbooks. I agree with IBM that people are movingt to Wikis etc, but the ones currently setup by IBM dont seem to have much content, so are pretty useless.. and no replacement at the moment for a good Redbook. |
| 387 | Pettrie de Bondt | Keep the Lotus Notes / Domio RedBooks comming. I already have a bookshelf full but I always need more information!! |
| 388 | Rimma Ziskine | Redbooks are incomparable information source applicable to all levels of Lotus Professionals. Can’t envision operating without! |
| 389 | Adrian Ang | I belongs to an IBM Premier partner and still helping alot of existing Lotus Domino's customers' applications to upgrade from 4 to 7.
I rely alot of redbook to help |
| 390 | Ronald Veldhuizen | It's the best resource in da field! |
| 391 | Gilbert Short | |
| 392 | Bart Severein | |
| 393 | Larry Cannon | I believe the Redbooks for Lotus products are an invaluable resource to the user community and sincerely hope IBM will continue to publish them.
Thank you. |
| 394 | William Malchisky Jr. | Redbooks are an essential mechanism to provide information. Wikis and blogs can provide data, but it lacks the formal research, editing, and typesetting that a publication of that caliber provides. Other community sites, lack the formal vetting process and concerted effort that a Redbook creates--by its nature. Removing this from the Lotus offerings, is a big mistake, in my humble opinion. |
| 395 | David Clover | This would be a self-immolating act. Please don't do it. |
| 396 | Jeffery Lay | The Redbooks are *vital* - no other good formal documentation (except perhaps the patchy help files) exists for Notes/Domino 8. The Redbooks are an essential reference and guide. |
| 397 | REMY Jean-Yves | |
| 398 | Anders larsson | I aggree to this petition, and so does many of colleagaues. 100 out 36000.
/Anders |
| 399 | Jesper Clausen | |
| 400 | David Kllingsworth | |