| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 301 | Julien | Big mistake mister IBM |
| 302 | kaare pedersen | |
| 303 | Jean | I find these books very valuable when supporting Lotus Notes/Domino and WebSphere. |
| 304 | Jan Ehrhardt | |
| 305 | Anonymous | I never became Lotus CLP or IBM Business Parter without the Lotus Redbooks. I even never started selling IBM Soft- and Hardware without the Lotus Redbooks because at the beginning they gave me the knowledge to understand the Lotus Domino / Notes thing good enough so sell it and to customize it. Much better then the enclosed documentation. |
| 306 | Sean Burgess | An invaluable resource for the Lotus Community. |
| 307 | Jim Knight | |
| 308 | Patrick Arnold | |
| 309 | Damiano Bramati | I agree, Redbooks are very important knowledge repository. |
| 310 | Glen Urban | |
| 311 | Fred Janssen | Yes, we need the redbooks ,they are invaluable when it comes to new technology from lotus. |
| 312 | Jan Michael Wrangel | I use the redbooks very often. Most of them are very useful and give an detailed view on a topic, as other infosources don't! |
| 313 | Kevin Kanarski | |
| 314 | Marco Di Feo | Keep Lotus Redbooks Alive!! |
| 315 | Ed Maloney | Redbooks are an invaluable resource for optimizing Lotus Notes environments. |
| 316 | Klaus Straube | |
| 317 | Ulrich-Thomas Lossa | Do not discontinue the valuable Redbooks |
| 318 | Lykle Schepers | Of course I need the Redbooks to stay and continue to be developed. My staff and I could not function properly without them.
Lykle Schepers |
| 319 | Paul Sabourin-Hertzog | Redbooks often contain the nuggets of wisdom that are required to get (and keep) IBM software going. Please don't leave us with just the product documentation... |
| 320 | Andrea Gomory | |
| 321 | Jason Rickerby | Redbooks and Redpapers have been invaluable aids over the years for people implementing and maintaining IBM products. Personally I have found these materials very helpful with Domino and TSM work I have had to do. It would be a shame to see products such as Domino, loose traction in the messaging and collaboration market space due to loosing the competitive advantage Redbooks provide. |
| 322 | Vaclav Vincalek | |
| 323 | Michael Fromin | Having worked on multiple Redbooks and used hundreds over the years I think Lotus is making a significant mistake in assuming other tools like Wikis and Blogs can effectively replace the role of Redbooks. |
| 324 | Dietmar Dumke | |
| 325 | Marti Christophe | |
| 326 | Lucio Bertoldi | Please, don't close redbooks center!!! |
| 327 | Mario Gereci | |
| 328 | Malcolm MacLeod | Redbooks rock! Sorry to hear that IBM feels the need to close this. Another nail in my heart! |
| 329 | Norman Foerster | |
| 330 | Anonymous | keep it going please :) |
| 331 | David Jolliffe | As MAnaging Director of an IBM business partner that implements Lotus Software, redbooks are an invaluable source of information for pre-sales and technical implementation team. Binning off RedBooks would be a short sighted move that reduces our ability to deliver IBM software to customers. Daft. |
| 332 | Jeffrey Griffin | |
| 333 | Ruediger L. Thomas | |
| 334 | Christian Henseler | Lotus Redbooks were and are of great value for my business success! Please keep the Lotus Redbooks center alive. |
| 335 | Gerd Seegemann | you got to be kidding. if lotus redbooks are no longer produced, i will look for a new job. I AM NOT KIDDING, I am PSM for BAYER, this would really look bad. |
| 336 | Richard Schwartz | |
| 337 | Christian Balzer | |
| 338 | Ken Porter | |
| 339 | Olav Behrens | |
| 340 | Anonymous | RedBooks should be written where the center of development and programm desing for the future resides. |
| 341 | Dag Kvello | IBM's Redbooks/Redpieces has been of tremendous value too me as a Professional and an IBM Partner for the last 17 years.
I can't think of anything that differentiates IBM from their competitors in such a positive way as Redbooks. |
| 342 | Raj | Please continue to release Lotus Redbooks. |
| 343 | Stuer | |
| 344 | Pierre Campoy | |
| 345 | Marcel Laurenz | |
| 346 | Michael Lee | |
| 347 | matthew wicks | This will end customers ability to evaluate products. I worked for a bank once and we chose to go with IBM products because we were able to read up on detailed aspects of the product and determine whether the product suited us With other vendors we were in the dark which worked against them greatly in our evaluation. |
| 348 | Alan Chow | |
| 349 | didith santika | |
| 350 | Anonymous | hello.. nice to meet you everyone
http://frank-lotusdomino.blogspot.com/ |