| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | Stuart McIntyre | |
| 2 | Joerg Michael | |
| 3 | Marc Henkel | |
| 4 | Manfred Peters | |
| 5 | Gregory Engels | Lotus Redbooks are invaluable to me. Especially because they provide an unobstructed view from the "real world" perspective, which is impossible to provide by technical writers who does not have customer experiences. |
| 6 | Matthew Buchanan | |
| 7 | Christopher Semturs | As long as there is suitable replacement in the market, please keep it! |
| 8 | Stefan Smolnik | |
| 9 | Otto Foerg | |
| 10 | Axel Laemmert | |
| 11 | Uwe Brahm | If you do not publish the source code of your products as open source, you need very good documentation! |
| 12 | Anonymous | |
| 13 | Paul Rigby | |
| 14 | Anonymous | |
| 15 | Markus Lachnit | |
| 16 | Julian Woodward | |
| 17 | Marco Foellmer | |
| 18 | Carl Tyler | Please rethink this decision. |
| 19 | Wolfgang Hass | 100% correct! |
| 20 | Bruce Elgort | |
| 21 | Michel Roliger | |
| 22 | Christoph Heyn | |
| 23 | Bruno Voigt | |
| 24 | Rudi Knegt | I feel it's a shame that IBM even considers taking redbooks off the list |
| 25 | Carsten Haedicke | |
| 26 | Vitor Pereira | |
| 27 | Gordon Inkson | Redbooks are an utterly invaluable resource that I use on a near-daily basis. Lotus are out of their minds to even consider abandoning them. |
| 28 | Sudhir | IBM must be crazy to cancel this, God only know how much of a help it has been while working with Lotus |
| 29 | Chris Hudson | |
| 30 | Jim Moffat | Redbooks are invaluable tools for consultants external to IBM who are involved in implementing or upgrading Lotus related infrastructure. Without these or a similar means of knowledge transfer, IBM customers will suffer. |
| 31 | Anonymous | |
| 32 | Marc Leblanc | |
| 33 | Nagendra PS | Please don't discontinue readbooks, as this is excellent source & affordable way to study about IBM Lotus Technologies. |
| 34 | Thomas Radigewski | |
| 35 | Thomas Schulte | This is absolutely and perfectly true. |
| 36 | Paul Smith | Redbooks are part of the enablement lifeblood beyond the virtual walls of IBM. Whilst a shift towards externalising the development of in depth technical material is generally a good idea - it should be done as an extension to a core of material that is developed within IBM as the definitive source of knowledge about Lotus products. |
| 37 | Sascha Reissner | |
| 38 | Pitt de Waard | |
| 39 | Peter Smith | Redbooks are an invaluable tool for techies, and are the only counter to the sea of books available for Microsoft software. Customers take comfort in the fact that as books are written about a product they must be in wide use. |
| 40 | Rick Wofford | Please reconsider this decision, I have found the Redbooks to be an invaluable source of information for more than 11 years as a Notes/Domino developer and administrator. |
| 41 | Gert van Kempen | |
| 42 | Anonymous | There are as of yet no online tools that can deliver the level of usefulness and quality that redbooks offer.
Please keep them! |
| 43 | Detlev Buschkamp | |
| 44 | Giovanni Luperto | |
| 45 | Bernd Hort | IBM Redbooks are the best source for good and liable information about IBM Lotus products. Without them it would be much harder to provide customer focused solutions. |
| 46 | CDavis | |
| 47 | Anonymous | Keep the Redbooks up! :) |
| 48 | Djuro Garvanovic | |
| 49 | Tony Palmer | Redbooks are indepth, valuable resources that encourage the use of Lotus products and help admins and developers get up to speed with complex issues in a way that is more realistic that a help reference.
If Lotus make it harder to get this knowledge, then developers and admins will choose the path of least resistance - which could be competitors products.
It's sad that IBM/Lotus made this decision in the light of recent announcements |
| 50 | Andreas Schaller | Another step from IBM to kill Notes...... |