Signatures 115 total

Page: 1, 2, 3

1. 1
   Name: Kevin on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Paul Warburton on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: David Frain on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments: Save this beautiful as soon as possible , the current owners will ruin this Manchester gem with there ridiculous plans

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Barry Seed on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments: CPO now!

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: D Hardy on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments: This magnificant building has been allowed to rot because the City council has failed to impose its demands on the owner who has in turn left the building as an eyesore on one of the major approaches to the city centre. The proposed plans for re-development are dreadful and must be rejected. All in all a disgraceful state of affairs. Time to force the issue.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Iain Peacock on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Daniel Bulley on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Michael Whitley on Sep 30, 2009

   Comments: I dont need to repeat what everyone else has already stated. The building should maintain its beauty and historic values by being refurbished; its external image should not alter in any way. It doesnt need an ugly glass extension to compete with other buildings as it competes with them as it stands. New buildings are not new forever and interest in them decreases after their construction (i.e beetham tower ) whereas, people still walk by th old fire station, look up, and still say "WOW". The wow factor cannot be lost by a new extension!

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: James on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: Redevelopment has been deferred on numerous occasions, with successive promises from the current owners that proposals were imminent. Even with the large scale regeneration of the surrounding Piccadilly area that has occurred in the past 10+ years, the current owners have failed to bring forward any viable proposal. The most recent proposals once again demonstrate no real seriousness to proceed with appropriate redevelopment and I therefore urge Manchester City Council to step in and CPO the grade II listed Fire Station, in order to secure its future, and further progress regeneration in this landmark location in Manchester City Centre.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Nick Grayson on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Alex Beaumont on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: Property developers working in dynamic urban environments have a responsibility to push projects forward for the wider good of the city, not merely for the good of their business. If they cannot do this within a realistic time frame they should put the site on the market. Britannia are acting irresponsibly and the council should CPO London Road Fire Station.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Mark Tinwell on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Christopher Goodacre on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Sara Bennett on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Michael Gibb on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Michael Wynnyczuk on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: John Needham on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Carl Flaherty on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: Please do not allow this fine building to fester for any longer!

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Alex Green on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: The current owners have taken much too long to do anything and all plans released appear purely as stalling tactics to delay any CPO. This should move to new owners ASAP to allow for expanded regeneration in the Piccadilly area.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Peter Robinson on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: Restore!

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Nicola Nolan on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: This lovely building has been neglected for too long. Lets act before it is too late.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: James Connolly on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: One of the most beautiful buildings in Manchester in such a key gateway position should not be left to decay or left in the hands of developers who, by current plans, seem hell-bent on destroying it.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Peter Murray on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Osei Wilkinson on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Philip Hussey on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Christopher Marsland on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: M Patel on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: This is a discrace that has gone on FAR too long. The council need to act now, before the building falls even further into disrepair and the refubishiing costs will escalate. CPO!

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Daniel Merryweather on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: The public deserve better.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Joseph Lee on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Pete on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Pete Staniforth on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Daisy Nicholson on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: John Berta on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Anthony Goodchild on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Simon on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments: Hear hear, about time this mess gets sorted out

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Andrew Desmier on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Matt Doran on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Daniel Lowe on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Paul Ladley on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Charlie Mills on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Jonathan Meyrick on Sep 30, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3