Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 26 total

Page: 1

  1. 1
    Name: Donald Rogers on Dec 31, 2012
    Comments: I like the guidelines. I believe its important to give anyone the opportunity of lifestyle without causing any harm to their neighbors and community.
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Gloria Seigle on Dec 31, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Bonnie Viggs on Dec 31, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 31, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Rebecca Watters on Dec 31, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Glinda Ledford on Dec 31, 2012
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Indiana BioChemcafo on Jan 1, 2013
    Comments: Yes, looks good and fair. It even allows the neighbors choice to approve if they dont mind animal factory next to them.
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Charles Oakes on Jan 2, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Dr Lewis Fred Schloemer on Jan 2, 2013
    Comments: I STRONGLY oppose the building of CAFOs of any size in this community, and especially in areas which are primarily residential, such as State Road 160.
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Carol Oakes on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments: Please understand the community concern for environmental health issues. Our families depend on our govt to secure healthy water, soil and air quality. I am not against farming or small business, but we cannot sacrifice our families health. I do not support anyones gain at your neighbors expense.
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Kay Gschwind on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments: I support the improved guidelines for land use proposal to include specific distance requirements, notification, etc. in regard to CAFO/CFO construction in Washington County, Indiana.
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Colleen Devlin on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments: I am in favor of this petition but with one caveat.... I believe the setbacks from residences should be equal to those for a school or hospital. We live in our residences every day. It's important that we all be protected equally.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Tony McClellan on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Debra McClellan on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Robin Adams on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Linda McClellan on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Laura McClellan-Wanke on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Steve Yeager on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments: I agree with these requests.
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Sharon Asher Janson on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Paula S. McClellan on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Boyd K. McClellan on Jan 3, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Byron McClellan on Jan 4, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Ernest R. Schnell RN, BSN, OCN on Jan 4, 2013
    Comments: given the detriment on the infrastacture of our county I am opposed to the construction of these barns. We already have times when the water pressure drops and it is difficult to keep the shower running, What happens when the barns come on. Also, who will be responsible for the upgrade in the road system to carry the increased large truck traffic? At the Salem end of SR160 there is a sign that warns large trucks to not use this road because of hills and sharp curves. Who is going to pay for the road improvements to sustain the barns?
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Jennifer Hoke on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Mark Hoke on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 21, 2013
    Comments: I all the time emailed this web site post page to all my contacts, because if like to read it afterward my contacts will too. wow gold http://www.wow-gold-team.com
    Flag

Page: 1

Sponsored links