SAVE LITTLE GREEN STREET

Signatures 1920 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 39 › »

1. 101
   Name: Chris Cole on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Richard on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Karen Glenister on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments: It seems entirely inappropriate to send lorries down this street, which is too small to cope and an historic treasure in its own right.

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Fabian Hercules on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments: This is outrageous and ill thought out - the developers will have to make alternative plans!

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Paul Turin on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments: deplorable

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Tom French on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Mike Gray on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Keir Snelling on Jul 12, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Danny Baldwin on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Elinor Bateman on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Carina Radford on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Robert Dynowski on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: This is the height of stupidity.Why destroy such a pretty streetSurely commonsense will prevail

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Alan Moore on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: This is complete nonesense for the local council to allow this work in a resedential area with a limited amount of access. Not to mention the safety hazards that this would cause. Yet again the madness of Camden Council in how it operates!

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Ailsa Christie on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Jes Wilkins on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Julian Abrams on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Roger Wiltshire on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: leave the road as it is Campden and spend the money on more serious pressing actions like children safety on roads issues

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Theresa Doherty on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Seira Fischer on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Dan Buckley on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Mia Freedman on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Olly Calleja on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Imbeciles

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Mia Freedman on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Tamsynne Westcott on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Fox Kuipers on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Suzy Chambers on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Preserve our heritage. This makes no sense!

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Paula Goad on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: This is an outrage, its all about how much money can be made not about maintaining London's/England's heritage or caring about the current community!

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Laura Simpson on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Adrian Mincher on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: This proposal is outrageous, English Heritage should be involved.

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Angie Squires on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Angie Squires on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Darron Mould on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Streets like this are so few, the exterior grade 2 listing should include the road and pavements. Keep this road clear.

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Richard Rogers on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Don Ricardo Drayton on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: this is a extremely bad idea to demolish a street for greed

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Steve Dawson on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Hana Zidek on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Helen Du Toit on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: I'm the mother/mother-in-law/grandmother of one of the families in Little Green Street and I visit regularly from the States. I've seen the family work so hard to convert a rundown ruin of the house into a lovely, safe family home,and would be heartbroken if this project were to go ahead and jeopardise their house and the safety of their children. Please do not allow this project to go ahead!

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Ian Preece on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: we badly need to preserve what is now left of our city history. such places as this street are a timeless symbol of a rapidly disappearing historic England

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: James Biddlecombe on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Jeremy Barraud on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Stephen J Pegum on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Camden Council must be simply mad to allow this to happen ! Good luck with the campaign - I wish you every success.

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Graham Smith on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Camden Council should have refused Planning Permission in the first place.

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Ebony Riddell on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Camden Council should intervene to uphold the rights of residents and local people, as well as preserving the integrity of the Grade II listed houses on Green Street.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Hope that sense prevails.

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Danny Minick on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Tony Nicol on Jul 12, 2006

    Comments: Just idiots.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 39 › »