Support Islington Council

Signatures 279 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 › »

1. 1
   Name: Simon Turner on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments: I support this petition and will help in any way I can

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Jill Rayner on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Emma Field on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments: Refusing to marry two men or women should be akin to refusing to marry mixed-race couples.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments: Civil partnerships are now law and this woman should be conducting them as part of her job. If she is not repaired to do this she should leave her job.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Jonathan Penny on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Damon Meadowcroft on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Karen Whitley on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Simon Ryder on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: Get rid of the crazy people!

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Liz Goodchild on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Mary Turner on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: Religious beliefs have no place in any civil act. The law makes it very clear that any type of civil ceramony should not have religious content and those conducting them should not be able to pick and choose which they find acceptable to their belief system.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Rev David Coleman on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: I m signing this petition because I do not believe that there should be any discrimination against anyone for reasons of sexual orientation. I also strongly repudiate the idea that Christian faith either sponsors or justifies such discrimination. The Church is not the place for any such prejudice. I write as national secretary for equal opportunities in my Church, which has a clear statement of equal oppportunities, which lends no support to the registrar concerned.

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Abigail Stevens on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Alexandra Mankowitz on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: People must not bring their views to the workplace, if it were a race issue they would be drummed out of the service We have legisltaion behind us to protect us.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Craig Williams on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: I value my own Civil Partnership above almost everything. I feel more fully inclusive than ever before and I thank the Government for this. Religion has a place in life but not when it impacts on our civil rights and liberties. I am proud to be British and proud of what we have acheived - I am horrified that one individual has been given the opportunity to begin to erode what we have fought so hard for and we so richly deserve.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Alex Handley - YCCD on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Kate Howard on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Craig Stuart on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Angela Wynne on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Marie Lewis on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Ross Burgess on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Phil Gosling on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: John Gammans on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Vanessa Clark Photography on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: It is not right to discriminate against anybody whether we are gay, lesbian,straight, black, white, buddhist, christian muslim. Love is a human right! Civil Parterships are recognised in law. It upsets me that there are still homophobic attitudes out there. Vanessa - Vanessa Clark Photography, the photogrpaher of choice for Civil Partnerships and weddings.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Emma Durrant-Rance on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: I fully support this Petition!Im am a married women with two children and I have many gay friends ! it makes me sad that the country still has small minded people that insist on keeping things in the past . My children will be brought up to except people for who they are just like me and my husband do!! Oh and about the religious thing what rubbish I thought GOD loved all of his children how ever they came I think it is time they practised what they preach isnt it!!! Emma Durrant-Rance from Banbury oxfordshire

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Donna Hart on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: This is the world gone mad! Would she refuse to marry Atheists on the grounds that they are all damned A register office ceremony is a choice for people who are not looking for a religious ceremony - if her beliefs are this strong she should choose a more suitable vocation.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Angie Alexandra on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Sarah Tyce on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Louise Ryer on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Faye Collyer on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Dylan Ryer-Tyce on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Dr. Richard Cleeve on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: This ruling should be overturned. It sets dangerous precedents for condoning bigotry and prejudice within society, and sends a clear message that homophobia is acceptable in the work place.

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Duncan Sowry-House on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Sheila Nolan on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: I believe that the law should be upheld with regard to Civil Partnerships and a registrar should not be allowed to "pick and choose".

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Ross MacLennan on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: This is a clear moral and legal breach of the practice of law in favour of the practice of media politics. It a world that is working hard to come to terms with the difficult social issues, this is wrong. It can never be right to allow belief a superior legal status that the law itself. There is no limit to the number of analogies that prove this to be a farce. There is not even a case for expediency.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Rhiannon Doller on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Caroline Gray on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Helen Baker on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: John Hickey-Fry on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: We all have rights!!!!

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Glyn Goodchild on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: Many sinners are married in church, "let those without sin cast the first stone".

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Sara Teers on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: I was outraged by this decision and consider it a duty placed upon all registrars to fulfill the remit of their responsiibilities irrespective of personal beliefs.

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Jamie Ambrose on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Georgina Turner on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: How any court can have found in favour of Lillian is beyond me. Religious beliefs have no place in the civil system, no question.

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: L Baker on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Francisco De Francesca on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Hanna Kenrick on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Paul Taylor on Nov 12, 2008

    Comments: This woman is using the discrimination defence to try to enforce discrimination against another group based on her personal beliefs. This should not be permitted under law!

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 6 › »