Long Time Bell Employees SHOULDN\'T Lose Out

Signatures 2884 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 58 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: what is Bell thinking

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: JOSIE on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: VERY DISAPPOINTED......WHAT IS THE INCENTIVE AFTER 25 YEARS, 30 YEARS THAT EMPLOYEES HAVE PUT IN....

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Sheppard on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Marilyn McPherson on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: It's sad to see the day when Bell would treat their employees in such a disrespectful way. The majority of the employees have given their lives to building up of this company and when they should be looking forward to their retirement they are told that they are screwed by the company that we used to consider family. There are companies out their that pay 100% for medical and dental. Shame on you Bell.

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: A royal kick in the ass by Mike to add insult to injury to my recent 10k annual pay cut for no apparent reason

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Darlene Allan on Mar 27, 2007

   Comments: I have been at Bell 29 years as of Jan 2011 I will be only 54 and I loose out big time. I think after all the years I have been with the company the least Bell can do is to allow us our benefis once we retire.

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: SYLVIE MARTEL on Mar 27, 2007

   Comments: BELL SHOULD NOT CUT ANY OF OUR BENEFITS-WE HAVE WORKED TO HARD & INVESTED IN BELL FOR A LONG TIME. WHY NOW NO WONDER BELL EMPLOYEE DROP BELL SERVICE TO GO TO COMPETITION.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Pina Greco on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Carol Matins on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I will be one of the employees who will only be able to retire after 2017. This is the respect that we get as employees of Bell Canada. This is totally wrong and what's next

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Rosemary Mamone on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Kathy Alexander on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Grace Mancuso on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Is this what "Team" work is about - take advantage of dedicated employees by squeezing as much as possible then just kick them out with nothing to be proud of the Company that they fought so hard to keep together - Where is the mentality of the people that run the company & shame on you "Union" if this is going through - what is the "Union" another word for "Team" which means squat all !!!!

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: at age 55 I would have worked 38 yrs for bell-I would retire in dec of 2012,so I WOULD MISS OUT ON BENEFITS BY 11 MONTHS after all my years of service,what can I SAY BUT THIS IS JUST WRONG

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Brenda Taylor on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I will have 32 years of dedicated service with Bell in 2013. What s slap in the face to know I have worked all these years to end up with nothing when I retire.

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Vivian Noye on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: they should cancel the bonuses for the CEO and see how he would like that

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: What are we paying union dues for

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Lauren Hand on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Do we have no value at all We are the people who have worked hard to make build this company into what it is!!!

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Companies cannot continue to walk away from these responsibilities for their employees. As employees we give their life to this company while we are working, their should not be an option to eliminate this.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Lisa Willimas on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: It is about time the employees fight back. Our Assocation is not helping us.

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Cathy Iannacito on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Is this what we get when we've worked for so many years and been loyal to our Company. Is this how Bell shows their appreciation. Is this how Bell shows that they "care" about their employees. Very, Very Shameful!

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Marlene Klowak on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I think that the company that I trusted is no more. They have out sourced many of the departments and I'm sure there is alot more to come. What has happened to keeping the Canadian economy going. They have lost a lot of crediblity with their employees and with the public. Service has gone down the tubes, and I don't think that there is anything in the near or distant future that will repair this. NOT WITH THE DIRECTION THE COMPANY HAS CHOSEN TO TAKE..............................

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I wonder if Michael Sabia will be affected by this benefit plan. I guess not, making 6 million a year plus, who needs benefits

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Teresa Patrick on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I vote you take my benefits away now as I don't need them. I will however need them when I'm old. The government plans don't cover glasses or dental. Bell Canada is abusing their employees with harassment tactics. Retire now, or lose everything. What a concept. If Sabia hadn't taken his millions in compensation, maybe we'd have enough.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Deborah Natale on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Steve Hariski on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I expect this union to take every step nessessary to stop this I also expect then to join the other union and fight this together

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Barbara Singleton on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Cosimo Fragomeni on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Lynn Halicki on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Beverly Wear on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I think it is very shameful the way Bell is treating the long time Employees who have build this company SHAME SHAME SHAME. and where is the CTEA. Bell and the CTEA show some R E S P E C T to the Employess who have made this Company

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Tracy Belaire on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Kelly East on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Kelly Brown on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Simone Sladkowski on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Unbelievable! A Company such as this being reduced to such a inhumane action. Let the echilons that are take a cut in their pension and see if they like it. Does this affect Michael Sabia when he retires!!!!!

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I don't agree, hear us.

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Jo-Anne Brossard on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Grace Duffy on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: What a way to show that we are valuable as employees!

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I can't believe that the executive team feels the only way to make Bell 'profitable' is to keep hacking away at the compensation for all employees except themselves. I guess when your pension is a couple hundred thousand dollars a year and your severance package is worth millions, you don't have to worry about paying for medical bills. Michael Sabia, Leo Houle and the guys at the tops have been working really hard to let employees with a lot of service know just how much they despise them. First they got rid of the Paid Absence prior to pension (no one else offers that don't you know!), then Patrick Pichette informs us that there will be NO MORE packages (except for the executive team) and now the benefits. I wonder why they are opening up the window for the DC pension plan again-are the DB pension payments next Shame on the guys at the top-maybe you ought to look at cutting the number of VP's-there appears to be a new one every few weeks, and how about cutting back on your bloated salaries and perks

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Wendy Cumming on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Dorothy Flood on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Bell's benefits are one of the reasons we all stay here. They have always been better than alot of other companies. Also, I personally do not care what Telus or Rogers is offering their employees. That is their concern not mine

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Avis Lecky on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: After years of loyal service I think it stinks that Bell wants to rip us off and pointing to the compitition to do so. Cheap shot on Bell's part.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Rose Josifovski on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: This is disgusting of the company to do this to it's dedicated employees for all the years we have worked so hard and now you knock us down by not paying for our denefits when we really need it the most at retirement.

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Colleen Sterling on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Truly disgusting

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Josee Villeneuve on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I also agree that we need to get rid of the Age 55 to retire. It should be age plus years service. If you have 85 factor you should be able to retire with full pension and benefits.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 58 › »