Signatures 46 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: John Sanderson on Dec 27, 2006Comments: There is no need to build on and destroy a Heritage Coast site in an AONB. Brownfield sites are a better environmental option.Flag
-
2
Name: Catherine Bowen on Dec 27, 2006Comments: The villages of Lesbury & Hipsburn have increased sufficiently during the past 4 years and more housing will adversely alter the characher of the villages.Flag
-
3
Name: Peter Hignett on Dec 27, 2006Comments: This Planning application appears to be based upon a Housing Needs Assessment conducted in the area which I believe to be flawed; a very small percentage of people indicated a need for this housing. This development would alter the character of a beautiful part of Lesbury village.Flag
-
4
Name: Helen Page on Dec 27, 2006Comments: There has been enough building of executive homes in this area in recent years. Many of the new build are simply holiday homes and built for profiteering without regard to actual residental need.Flag
-
5
Name: Dominic Hogan on Dec 28, 2006Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Anna Senior on Dec 28, 2006Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Angus Morrogh-Ryan on Dec 29, 2006Comments: I have spent many happy holidays staying in Lesbury and am concerned that the application represents the overdevelopment of a highly attractive village.Flag
-
8
Name: Sue Boetius on Dec 29, 2006Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Anonymous on Dec 29, 2006Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Sarah Reardon on Jan 2, 2007Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Anne Thomas on Jan 2, 2007Comments: This would be a real backward step for the village of Lesbury, please decline this application. ThanksFlag
-
12
Name: James Battey on Jan 2, 2007Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Claire Limbrey on Jan 2, 2007Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Roger Thomas on Jan 2, 2007Comments: This development does not comply with many of the objectives within the Alwick Districk Local Development Framework. Lesbury is close to RAF Boulmer which will creat employment problems for the area. The proposed site is a green field of particular lowland pasture with good shelter. Access onto the road is poor and the coastal road will gain even more traffic.Flag
-
15
Name: Roger Thomas on Jan 2, 2007Comments: This development does not comply with many of the objectives within the Alwick Districk Local Development Framework. Lesbury is close to RAF Boulmer which will creat employment problems for the area. The proposed site is a green field of particular lowland pasture with good shelter. Access onto the road is poor and the coastal road will gain even more traffic.Flag
-
16
Name: S & V Ritchie on Jan 2, 2007Comments: We have two major concerns:- 1. This may well be the tip of the iceberg, as the site concerned is clearly able to take more houses. 2. The Council may not follow through to make sure these are not let to holiday makers.Flag
-
17
Name: James Ward on Jan 3, 2007Comments: I am upset to hear that a family known for their development of areas of beauty such as Alnwick Garden aere attempting to build on an area of outstanding beauty. SHAME ON YOU!Flag
-
18
Name: Anonymous on Jan 3, 2007Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Terence Appleby on Jan 5, 2007Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Joyce Caffrey on Jan 8, 2007Comments:Flag
-
21
Name: Joseph Keith Hopper on Jan 8, 2007Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Sarah Riddell on Jan 8, 2007Comments: This is agricultural land in an area of natural beauty, I do not aree with building here and am concerned about road safety.Flag
-
23
Name: Jennifer Hopper on Jan 8, 2007Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Howard Riddell on Jan 8, 2007Comments: I have been here on holiday and do not agree with building on agricultural land in this beautiful area.Flag
-
25
Name: Vanessa Baylis on Jan 8, 2007Comments: This village is currently very pretty and development on this site will affect this greatly. It will be a real shame to see the proposed developments on this land.Flag
-
26
Name: Maureen Dutton on Jan 8, 2007Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Duncan Knowles on Jan 8, 2007Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: William Robson on Jan 9, 2007Comments: The propsed site is too far from the bus route which is at the opposite end of the village and is too far from the primary school.Flag
-
29
Name: Mark Baylis on Jan 9, 2007Comments: To bulid affordable housing on this area of outstanding natrual beauty would be a travisty. It would destroy evidance of historical farming methods, such as ridge and furrow; significantly alter the character of the village and potentially increase the risk of traffic accidents as road entraces will open onto a blind bend.Flag
-
30
Name: Rick & Alma Duncan on Jan 9, 2007Comments: There are several more appropriate "brown field" and derelict sites within Alnwick district which should preferentially be developed .Flag
-
31
Name: Mary Keeler on Jan 9, 2007Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Mary Keeler on Jan 9, 2007Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: David Johnson on Jan 9, 2007Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Darren Bogacki on Jan 9, 2007Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Kevin Warren on Jan 10, 2007Comments: The infrastructure of the Village can support this type of developmentFlag
-
36
Name: Kevin Warren on Jan 10, 2007Comments: The village cannot support this developmentFlag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Jan 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Anonymous on Jan 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Anonymous on Jan 11, 2007Comments: An area of outstanding natural beauty should not be built on.Flag
-
40
Name: Anonymous on Jan 11, 2007Comments: Designated areas of heritage land should be preserved. Also, houses and accompanying traffic/noise would adversely affect the character of the village.Flag
-
41
Name: Laura Jansen on Feb 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Melanie Owers on Feb 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Kenny And Jan Nisbet on Apr 15, 2007Comments: More destruction planned. Build on brownfield sites only. Maintain the character of the villages.Flag
-
44
Name: Travis Cooper on Jun 23, 2007Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Kevin Hay on Jun 28, 2008Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Kevin Hay on Jun 17, 2012Comments:Flag
Page: 1