Signatures 19 total
Page: 1
-
1
Name: Phil Challen on Dec 8, 2006Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Maria Challen on Dec 8, 2006Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2006Comments: Dont see the point in this its just another way of getting money from residents who dont want it and already pay enough to the councilFlag
-
4
Name: B Cope on Dec 8, 2006Comments: Strongly oppose the proposed introduction of "no waiting" restrictions in Willoughby Road (north). We do not want these or a residents parking scheme. Also object to the proposed introduction of pay & display parking in Meadfiled Road close to the Post Office. This is a bus route and heavily used through road and no parking should be permitted before its junction with New Road.Flag
-
5
Name: Linda Bliss on Dec 8, 2006Comments: It is outrageous that I should have to pay to park outside my own home! Particularly, in my road, it would also mean that I would have to move my car twice a day to prevent getting a ticket!!Flag
-
6
Name: Laura Bliss on Dec 8, 2006Comments: I should not have to pay a charge to visit my parents home at the weekend!Flag
-
7
Name: Adrian Bliss on Dec 8, 2006Comments: Why should I have to pay to visit my family at the weekend, when others can park there during the week for no real charge at all!!!Flag
-
8
Name: Barry Rees on Dec 9, 2006Comments: Our flats have a private parking area, off Willoughby Road - which, since the sell off of the College car park and charges levied on local car parks, has already seen extensive use by non residents. On several occasions I have been late for mettings as I have not been able to get my car out of the garage - on on return have had to park in Willoughby Road, as the residents car park bays in front of our garages have been occupied. I can only see this situation getting worse if these proposals are, undemocratically, pushed through.Flag
-
9
Name: Kathie Achilleas on Dec 10, 2006Comments: I am against any form of retricted parking in the Willoughby Road areaFlag
-
10
Name: George Achilleas on Dec 10, 2006Comments: We should be able to park outside our own home without restriction or charge.Flag
-
11
Name: GARETH COOPER on Dec 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Cheryl Cooper on Dec 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Marcus Cooper on Dec 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Aaron Cooper on Dec 10, 2006Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Maria Challen on Dec 12, 2006Comments: This is another hairbrained scheme from the council to make innocent residents pay for their obvious mistakes when consenting to property build in the area and not sufficient parking allocated and the sell off of a functional college car park, to make way to Scholars' Walk. I strongly object to these parking resitrictions in all the roads indicated as they will not sort out the issues but make them worse.Flag
-
16
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2006Comments: I received a proposal form from the council but my next door neighbour didn't. Neither did the man directly opposite me. Thats 50% of my immediate neighbours who didn't receive one. What happens if you were to transfer that average across the whole area in question. Only half the people with an interest would be in a position to let their feeling be known. On the assumption that some people will just throw their proposal forms away, that leaves less than half the interested parties able to comment. I have just been to the 'drop-in' meeting in Langley College where a woman from the design team () told me that a 'no response' is equal to 'don't care'. This makes it an almost certainty that the council will assume that, as they got less than half the proposal forms back, they have the go ahead to put the plans into place. I personally think this is outrageous behaviour.Flag
-
17
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2006Comments: I received a proposal form from the council but my next door neighbour didn't. Neither did the man directly opposite me. Thats 50% of my immediate neighbours who didn't receive one. What happens if you were to transfer that average across the whole area in question. Only half the people with an interest would be in a position to let their feeling be known. On the assumption that some people will just throw their proposal forms away, that leaves less than half the interested parties able to comment. I have just been to the 'drop-in' meeting in Langley College where a woman from the design team () told me that a 'no response' is equal to 'don't care'. This makes it an almost certainty that the council will assume that, as they got less than half the proposal forms back, they have the go ahead to put the plans into place. I personally think this is outrageous behaviour.Flag
-
18
Name: Anonymous on Dec 12, 2006Comments: I am a new, young driver and have just invested thousands of pounds on driving lessons, a car, car insurance and tax. The majority of this money was raised by me, the last thing I need is to pay out for a permit as well. The focus should be on the corner of Meadfield Road and the car park in Langley Village.Flag
-
19
Name: Fiona Kennedy on Dec 12, 2006Comments: Not only will this proposal cause huge daily inconvenience to the residents of Langley as well as reducing the value of our houses but we are also being asked to pay for the privilege. The council has allowed Langley to develop beyond the capacity of its infrastructure and we are being asked to pick up the pieces. The so-called 'consultation meeting' at Langley college seemed to be more a case of gauging public opinion rather than any honest attempt at consultation; a proper public consultation meeting with council members should be the starting point of any proposal from an effective council. There is a small area in the very centre of the village where parking needs to be banned completely but in residential roads these measures do not offer any kind of solution and will only make the situation worse.Flag
Page: 1