lakeshore

Signatures 752 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 16 › »

1. 151
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Nicholas Valleau on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Melanie Huston on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): We need to explore alternative parking solutions away from the lake's edge, not only for the Palais, but also for future events/attractions.The beach is for the whole community and we should be thinking about enhancing the waterfront's natural assets. If we are going to give it away to our cars, what's left for usIf I want to picnic in a parking lot, there are plenty of options around the city. When I moved down by the lake in 1993, the majority of people I ran into while walking my dog at 6:00 a.m. were Johns coming off the Gardiner looking for a quickie before going to work. People would say that you were crazy to go down there because that's where folks were murdered.Lights and a boardwalk changed all that and now people run, rollerblade and actually take their children down there. We have the Sunny side pavillion and now the new Palais. That's exciting; but it should only be the beginning. Pegasus deserves a real chance for success considering the efforts they have made and the money they have spent and I believe that a real solution to the parking issue is neccessary.The park to the east of the Palais only adds to it's charm. That's a no brainer. Please reconsider using the meridian as useful parking. It is pleasant to look at, but no one is going to use it as a place to play with their kids or have a relaxing picnic.It certainly would accomodate more than 120 cars and would allow access to and from Lakeshore Blvd. in both directions I was infuriated at the meeting on April 24th. I found Sylvia Watson to be both cagey and dismissive. She certainly did nothing to try to dispel the rising anger. Maybe I am naive, but I have a hard time believing that David Miller is backing this proposal. And I will be waiting to hear his comments on this issue.

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Patrick Gonya on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Richard Mongiat on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Donna Seto on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Donna Seto on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Dale Breen on Apr 29, 2006

   Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Eden Breen on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Barb Woods on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Erik Petersen on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): I'm living in Hong Kong right now, where there is virtually NO green space. Toronto has a good thing -- let's not have it thrown away!

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Lin Gibson on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Once you pave paradise there's no going back. Don't do it!

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Caio Freitas on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Carla Philp on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): This is shameful, in the face of so-called waterfront revitalization.

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Jeff Churchill on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Tony Drake on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Ms Watson should look up the name Sylvia.

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Geoff Charabin on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): The Toronto waterfront parklands must remain a public domain and not for the privilege of a few well- heeled individuals.

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Derek Scott on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Tanya Hart on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Neil Webster on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Dave Caloia on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Alejandra Oreiro on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Julie Henderson on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Andrew Hunt on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Parking of any kind on the park shores whether temporary or permanent will cause auto fuel run off which will negatively affect the park soil and the adjacent lake. There is already too much interference with cars along the Martin Goodman Trail and should be reduced not increased. Thank You.

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Sonia Mitchell on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Ryan Brunton on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: Sandra Bearzot on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Alexandra Funnell on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): I love walking around the lakeshore, and putting a parking lot on the public's land is such a waste! The idea of parking in the St. Joseph's garage is a wonderful alternative, seeing as the proceeds go towards the hospital.

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Arlene Hazzan Green on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Linda Weber on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Steve Funnell on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): The suggestions regarding parking that have been proposed by the PRA are solid and worthy of solid consideration by the city as alternatives to the parking lot. In an article in this week's Villager (Friday April 28/06), it is stated that 3 trees would have to be removed. Are these the willows mentioned in the Globe & Mail article

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Karm on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): great rollerblading spot with beautiful scenery - where else in Toronto is there a place so good and convenient NOWHERE!

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Gail Brisley on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Park, not parking. Keep the Beach as it is.

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Vilma Dautaj on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Janice on Apr 29, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): our waterfront improvement must include as much natural waterfront as possible

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Mieke Geldart on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Alexandra Palmer on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: Alexandra Palmer on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Sholem Dolgoy on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): (Copy of letter to Miller and Watson) As a very long time resident of Parkdale, I am opposed to the creation of a new gravel parking lot for the Palais Royal. There must be a public consultation process to explore options that are less invasive to the waterfront. Every effort has been made to maintain the integrity of the building proper. The same care must be taken with the surrounding landscape. The City of Toronto Staff Report of May 18, 2005 states: "A detailed Landscape Plan, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and Director, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, will be required prior to undertaking any landscaping work." To the best of my knowledge, if this Plan exists, it has not been made available to the community. The community and the RMRA have proposed a number of very reasonable and practical alternatives that are in keeping with existing practice for the Ex and for Caribanna. These options must take higher priority in a public process before the approval of a new gravel parking lot. Sholem Dolgoy Parkdale

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Alison Lawrence on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Surely instead of more parking lots on the waterfront we should be working for better pedestrian accessibility to the western beaches and better and more accessible public transit, rather than further clogging our beautiful parkland with MORE CARS.

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Linda Ott on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Marcella Bungay Stanier on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Maggie Cresswell on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): I cannot express strongly enough how disappointed I am at the turn of events regarding the renovation of the Palais Royale. I feel completely let down.

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: Norman Kolasky on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Angela Peres on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them):

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Ric Jurgens on Apr 30, 2006

    Comments (optional, but we would like to hear them): Put parking on the island across from the Royal. There is a connection to the walkway and this land is not used for anything else!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 16 › »