Rationalisation of kit car registration

Signatures 72 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 1
   Name: Ben Bromilow on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments: Here's the first!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Chris Good on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: J Bradbury-sharp on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Mark Duncan on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Oliver Hill on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Nigel Marston on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Anonymous on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Tim Hoverd on Nov 8, 2006

   Comments: A very sensible money-saving idea

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Peter Smith on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Louise Rutter on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: It really should be the case that at least one person at every office is fully knowledgeable in kit car regulations, even if everyone isn't. As it stands at the moment, not only do many people not know the regs, they don't even seem to know where to check them!

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Simon McCarthy on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Craig Sutherland on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Umar Bhutta on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: not had a very pleasent experiance of transfering my reg. Not happy

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Simon Overy on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Marc on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: why have an mot or inspection when the SVA is a 5 hour test that covers everything and more than the mot/inspection!!!

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Ian Turner on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Tom Hewitt on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: G D Coles on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: sva luton no probs build up examination plod adds chassis no then mot then sva and a sensible person to talk to at luton office no probs with luton regards graham

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: G D Coles on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: sva luton no probs build up examination plod adds chassis no then mot then sva and a sensible person to talk to at luton office no probs with luton regards graham

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Marshall Loudon on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Stefan Zbrozek on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: There are too many varying interpretations, between regional offices, of the guidelines set out by DVLA Swansea. I hope that this petition heightens the need for more conformity and consistency between regional DVLA offices.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Karl Challis on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Dan Beeston on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Mark Watson on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: rationalise the process for the registration of kit cars

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Trevor Bennett on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments: Please make Kitcar registration consistant throughout all offices.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Andrew Bradbury on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Ken Wiseman on Nov 8, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Chris Ellans on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: Registration at Nottingham was no problem, but I know of other people who have bought exactly the same car (with all new components) having difficulties registering the car due to having to have the car inspected.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Gordon Griffin on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: The concept of a "local office" is a nonsense also - from my home there is no office closer than an hour's drive on a weekday, and I live in Surrey.

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Roy Booth on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: The requirement for an inspection also seems to be dependant on kit manufacturer and car model, Caterham 7's for example don't seem to require an inspection. I'd like to know what an inspection is supposed to find that a 3 hour SVA test doesn't find. From my experience the SVA testers are very picky always erring on the side of failure if there is any doubt and always having safety in the forefront of their decision making. I think the registration inspection is totally redundant and just shows the fragmentation adn lack of communication between DVTA and DVLA

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Phil Lovegrove on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: Edinburgh DVLA is working well.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Mark Hibbins on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Andy Hampshire on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Richard Lloyd on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: sort it out !!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Tim Swait on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Paul Rogers on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: Complete agreement

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Gavin Cocks on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: it would make life so much easier for kit car builders if things were more consistant

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Stuart Thistleton on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: sort it out guys!!! just cause its an F reg dosent mean it MUST have an MOT

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Chris Noonan on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Bob Green on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Clive Lambourne on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: The fact that a government department trusted with such important matters, can let different offices make the procedure up as they go along, worries me greatly.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Alister Jackson on Nov 9, 2006

    Comments: The DVLNI - The Northern Ireland branch appear to make the rules up as they go along - how about one set of consistent rules for everyone

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 10, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 10, 2006

    Comments: I've been through the build process / SVA / Registration and frequently found myself confused about the best sequence to do things in and how to do them. Key variances by region were :- Chassis no (create own / take car to DVLA / be told over phone / make up from invoice), Sequence of events : MOt / SVA / Chassis number . None of this helps when trying to insure a car that has no identity !

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Geoff Camps on Nov 10, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: John Kelly on Nov 10, 2006

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2