Signatures 134 total
-
1
Name: Anne Cutter on Jul 26, 2007Comments: We need more space for those in need of comfort and care in their last days. Let them live in peace and quiet at this sad time.Flag
-
2
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: H.seitz on Jul 26, 2007Comments: Typical council policy,greed, STOP this now if you have any morals at all.Let St Lukes have the land,you are only thinking of the money side . What if loved ones needed aplace like St Lukes and you got turned away through lack of space,then how would you feel.Unless someone from the council is benefiting in another way by getting the land sold to developers!!!Flag
-
5
Name: Jane Marciano on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Alan Morris on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: David Saunders on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments: As a long time supporter of St Lukes and the son of some one who received wonderful care there at the end of his life, I am horrified at these proposals. Please think again.Flag
-
9
Name: Clelia Grayson on Jul 26, 2007Comments: very good causeFlag
-
10
Name: Vivienne Gould on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
11
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
12
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Barrie Mintz on Jul 26, 2007Comments: St.Luke's provides an essential service to the local community and should be protected from any housing developmentFlag
-
14
Name: Doreen Kruger on Jul 26, 2007Comments: There is already far too much in-filling in Brent. Please do not chase profits, but consider the needs of those who are use the hospice and secure that valuable, peaceful green space on which the hospice stands for their benefit . Doreen KrugerFlag
-
15
Name: Michael Topper on Jul 26, 2007Comments: Whilst there is a need for more housing accommodation this must not be at the expense of the terminally ill (St Luke's) or youth (Scout Hut). Please ensure this decision is reversed.Flag
-
16
Name: Michael Topper on Jul 26, 2007Comments: Whilst there is a need for more housing accommodation this must not be at the expense of the terminally ill (St Luke's) or youth (Scout Hut). Please ensure this decision is reversed.Flag
-
17
Name: Mr & Mrs A Peters on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Monty Levy on Jul 26, 2007Comments: It is absolutely essential that the planning group realise how important St Lukes Hospice is to the community. It is a shining example to everyone, of serving the community irrespective of Race, Ethnic background or colour. This should be a case where the Council gives the site to St Lukes at no charge, or allows the site to be used, (The Council retaining ownership), to allow St Lukes to build and to expand its facilitiesFlag
-
19
Name: K & A Peters on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Ruth Topper on Jul 26, 2007Comments: Utterly unacceptable to suggest removing the scout hut or in any way restricting St Luke's - this surely cannot be allowed to happen.Flag
-
21
Name: Ruth Topper on Jul 26, 2007Comments: Utterly unacceptable to suggest removing the scout hut or in any way restricting St Luke's - this surely cannot be allowed to happen.Flag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Simon Angel on Jul 26, 2007Comments: St. Luke Hospice provides and invaluable to the local Kenton community of all faiths. Pleaee do not even consider seeling the land for housing. The Hospice is much more important. As an ex scouter to consider removing the scout hut in favor of of housing is ridiculousFlag
-
25
Name: Alan Angel on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments: I object very strongly to the removal of St. Lukes Hospice from its present site - it contributes in a valuable way to the community.Flag
-
29
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Fiona Blumfield on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
31
Name: Priscilla Dale on Jul 26, 2007Comments: St Lukes is a magnificent community achievement doing wonderful work for all WITHOUT COUNCIL AID. Brent should be helping not hindering this establishment. Considering selling it for housing development is a moral outrage and will make the Borough realise what their leaders' priorities really are.Flag
-
32
Name: Monty Kolsky on Jul 26, 2007Comments: Thank you for giving me the opportunity to support this important petition. St Luke's is a non-sectarian landmark facility of proven value for the people of Kenton and the surrounding area and deserves the full support of our community.Flag
-
33
Name: Mark Simmons on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Cyril Starr on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: J King on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Daniel Saunders on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
40
Name: Trevor Berkley on Jul 26, 2007Comments: I cannot believe this is even being contemplatedFlag
-
41
Name: Anonymous on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Helen Goldblatt on Jul 26, 2007Comments: As I have friends who have used St Lukes services and have also died there I feel this is an important part of our community in BrentFlag
-
43
Name: Mrs H Fagan on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Alan Glinert on Jul 26, 2007Comments: I feel very strongly that these houses should not be built on land needed for the hospice.Flag
-
45
Name: Evelyn Brazil on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
46
Name: Maureen Morris on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Doreen Wolf on Jul 26, 2007Comments: I am a volunteer receptionist at St. Luke's Hospice and strongly object to Brent Council's proposal.Flag
-
48
Name: Bernard Altman on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Judith Cowan on Jul 26, 2007Comments: They still haven't managed to sell all the flats in the development further up the road. Why on earth does there need to be any more blocks of flats It's outrageous to evn think of closing downthe hospice.Flag
-
50
Name: Malcolm Cowan on Jul 26, 2007Comments:Flag