Keep the Capes Wild

Signatures 287 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »

1. 201
   Name: Dave Otto on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 202
   Name: Campbell McColl on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 203
   Name: Carlo Riswick on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 204
   Name: Nick Jackson on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 205
   Name: Harrison Bowe on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 206
   Name: Alex FitzGerald on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 207
   Name: Luke on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 208
   Name: Martin on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 209
   Name: Hamish Johns on Nov 8, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 210
    Name: Mrs Nadia Tildesley on Nov 8, 2011

    Comments: This Three Capes Development should NOT be allowed, considering the Tasmanian state govt. are making severe cutbacks of vital services and removing hospital beds. Yet there is $33m for this environmentally destructive project ! NO NO NO NO PLEASE DON'T DO IT

    Flag
11. 211
    Name: Rob Tennant on Nov 8, 2011

    Comments: Keep Shippies free of this shit.

    Flag
12. 212
    Name: Mitchal Parkin on Nov 8, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 213
    Name: Matt Carosi on Nov 8, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 214
    Name: Michael Brennan on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: I dont agree with this proposal there are alot more areas within the Tasmanian government that this money should be allocated. I have been surfing at Shipstern Bluff for the last 10 years and I dont think this will be good for anything.

    Flag
15. 215
    Name: Michael Brennan on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: I dont agree with this proposal there are alot more areas within the Tasmanian government that this money should be allocated. I have been surfing at Shipstern Bluff for the last 10 years and I dont think this will be good for anything.

    Flag
16. 216
    Name: Mark Brightwell on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 217
    Name: Donald Murray on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 218
    Name: Nicholas Heard on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 219
    Name: Jim Dell on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: This type of commercialization of national parks is not a sustainable direction. I feel that the bush is a public asset and should not be sold off - as inevitably the price earned never matches the cost. Keep the Capes wild - there are already existing tracks into these ares. Spend the money in rebuilding the "Parks and Wildlife" - more rangers to prevent the destruction and miss use of the states resources. while you are at it spend some money on policing catches from recreational fishing - Parks and marine environment need stewards - and these must be paid for by the public service - get your act together and we still might be considered a natural wonderland in 20 years time!

    Flag
20. 220
    Name: Jamie Scott on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: You Brian, are an idiot

    Flag
21. 221
    Name: Benn Richardson on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: maybe spend a little more money in other national parks, get them back up to speed.. ie walking tracks, huts, promotion etc. rather than dumping a whole heap of money into something that is not really economically viable..

    Flag
22. 222
    Name: Rory on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 223
    Name: John Peter Emmerton on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: Leave Wellington Park alone too.

    Flag
24. 224
    Name: Martin Paradisis on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: dont do it

    Flag
25. 225
    Name: Matthew Jaeger on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 226
    Name: Patrick Fasnacht on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 227
    Name: Tim Fisher on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 228
    Name: Misterr Mysto on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: Im not tasmanian but I dont want shippies pimped

    Flag
29. 229
    Name: Mick Van Der Woude on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 230
    Name: Gravity Surf on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 231
    Name: Ben Wright on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 232
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 233
    Name: Sam on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: fuck development

    Flag
34. 234
    Name: Brad Jackson on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: worst thing to happen to tasmainia.

    Flag
35. 235
    Name: Abby Otten on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 236
    Name: Michael Edward Cross on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: The expenditure of $33 million cannot be justified on this proposal in any way, shape or form. Not only will these so called 'developments' greatly diminish from what makes these areas so attractive in the first place but they will represent a gross negligence in the face of cuts to health and education systems in this state.

    Flag
37. 237
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 238
    Name: JayVee on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 239
    Name: JayVee on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 240
    Name: Jimmy Houghton on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 241
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: keep it natural

    Flag
42. 242
    Name: Josh Hallam on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments: fuck the government

    Flag
43. 243
    Name: Elizabeth Hamilton on Nov 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 244
    Name: Sandy Ryan on Nov 10, 2011

    Comments: No development at Shipsterns Bluff or Tunnel Bay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Flag
45. 245
    Name: Tim Baxter on Nov 10, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 246
    Name: Monika Lobe on Nov 10, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 247
    Name: Lucy Nairn-Smith on Nov 10, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 248
    Name: Jacqui Ward on Nov 14, 2011

    Comments: This area is magnificent in its natural state, please save it from this development.

    Flag
49. 249
    Name: Alexis Clark on Nov 14, 2011

    Comments: Keep our natural areas wild!

    Flag
50. 250
    Name: Trudy Woodcock on Nov 14, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »