Keep the Capes Wild

Signatures 287 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »

1. 101
   Name: Jack Nuttall on Aug 11, 2011

   Comments: $33 for the development can not be justified when essential health services are being cut. Simple track maintenance and a tourism campaign would achieve the same results at a significantly reduced cost.

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Ben West on Aug 11, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Mick Yemm on Aug 11, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 11, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Anonymous on Aug 14, 2011

   Comments: Do something, not this planned walk.

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Annette Lynema on Aug 14, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Lorrayne Watson on Aug 14, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Trisha Tatnell on Aug 15, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Tania Golding on Aug 15, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Paul E. Smith on Aug 18, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Sharon East on Aug 18, 2011

    Comments: Please save this spectacular National Park from this inappropriate development.

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Vern Doddridge on Aug 20, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: R. J. Scott on Aug 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Paul Blake on Aug 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: David Abbott on Aug 22, 2011

    Comments: A national park is not a recreation ground. The principle of minimal impact was never more relevant.

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Jo Hall on Aug 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Mike Emery on Aug 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2011

    Comments: Thank you

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Michaela Guest on Aug 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Andrew Hingston on Aug 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Karen Meredith on Aug 25, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Jane Cairns on Aug 25, 2011

    Comments: Anyone who is passionate about walking in this area will and is able to safely complete the walk to the three(3) capes using existing tracks.

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Serena Rule on Aug 25, 2011

    Comments: Stop supporting big business at the expense of much needed funding for schools and health! The mentality of Tasmanian Labor is on a par with Marie Antoinette. Fund bread and butter not cake - especially when the cake is environmentally unfriendly.

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Maggy Hunter on Aug 26, 2011

    Comments: Dear Brian, I urge you to refuse approval of the proposed Three Capes Development. This wonderful area, its flora, fauna, landscapes and seascapes needs to be protected from insensitive and highly impacting development. By all means please improve the current tracks and opportunities for day walks. Yours sincerely Maggy Hunter

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Kim Lynch on Aug 28, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Simon De Little on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Jane Higgins on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments: A waste of money especially when the budget is so tight

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: John Higgins on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Jane Jansen on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Evert Jansen on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Iain Clarke on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: David Pryce on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Barbara MacCana on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments: This is not the right development for a multi-day walk. It requires too much external support such as transport between stages.

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Stephen Stolp on Aug 29, 2011

    Comments: What we have now in terms of facilities is fine. The walks are excellent, in reach as day or multi day walks; spend the money elsewhere, where it's needed.

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Tom Nilsson on Aug 30, 2011

    Comments: Waste of money & bad for the environment.

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Peter Jones on Aug 30, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Matthew Paul Brough on Sep 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Alderman Kay McFarlane on Sep 4, 2011

    Comments: This project does not have the support of many of the locals nor is it needed. Please reconsider and redirect $$ towards the renewal of current infrastructure and not the 'Privatisation of Public lands", leasing out National Parks for private gain is not a public benefit.

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: John Cianchi on Sep 4, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Sharon Moore on Sep 4, 2011

    Comments: This is a truly special area; its nature conservation values should not be sacrificed for the sake of profit for a few. The Tasman Peninsula community would be much better served by more sensitive eco-tourism options, where people would stay in the local area. Also, the bushwalkers who want to use the area, and use it with much lower impacts, will only be put off by the helicopters and the new infrastructure: I know I won't be going there again if this development happens. It beggars belief that the government is even considering this option when it is cutting spending in areas of vital services and infrastructure.

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Ian Cuthbertson on Sep 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: John Stafford on Sep 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Wendy Austin on Sep 6, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Sally Attrill on Sep 6, 2011

    Comments: This is a beautiful wild area I have visited life-long-its solitude and isolation are integral to the appeal. Please keep this area for tents and don't allow developement.

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Darrel Shields on Sep 8, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 8, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Wendy Austin on Sep 9, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Anonymous on Sep 11, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Jane Bradshaw on Sep 12, 2011

    Comments: Some things need to be left paeceful and rugged.

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Angela Tamayo on Sep 12, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 › »