Signatures 287 total
-
1
Name: Tina Cundall on Aug 6, 2011Comments:Flag
-
2
Name: Kirsten Jones on Aug 6, 2011Comments:Flag
-
3
Name: John Sampson on Aug 6, 2011Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Simone Yemm on Aug 6, 2011Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: Anonymous on Aug 6, 2011Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Anonymous on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Patsy Jones on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Nick Morgan on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Nella Pickup on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Alessandra Whiting on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
11
Name:
Jo McRae on Aug 7, 2011
Comments: This project is very ill-advised, will do much damage to an isolated area and will bring few if any benefits.Flag -
12
Name: Anonymous on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
13
Name: Pen Tayler on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Dan Broun on Aug 7, 2011Comments: Makes sense to me......Flag
-
15
Name: Margaret Steadman on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: Dr Martin Walch on Aug 7, 2011Comments: This is an appalling lock out of an area developed by locals. No 3 capes exclusive tours. No private huts, no monopoly deals.Flag
-
17
Name: Pete on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Jeffrey Ray Dunn on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: GERARD DUKE on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Anonymous on Aug 7, 2011Comments: This has been an ill thought out project with little consideration of local interests or alternative options. The Minister must consider this alternative.Flag
-
21
Name: Suzanne Bell on Aug 7, 2011Comments:Flag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Emily Clough on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Amy Dyer on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Bronwyn & Kerry Smith on Aug 8, 2011Comments: Thanks for the great work will fwd on to our networkFlag
-
26
Name: Simon Branigan on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: David Bretz on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: A Breen on Aug 8, 2011Comments: This national park cannot sustain such development.Flag
-
29
Name: Barb Hart on Aug 8, 2011Comments: This is an area where multi day walks that include all the points of interest cannot be planned in advance, due to the fact that the area is subjected to frequent gale force winds.Flag
-
30
Name: Amanda Beyer on Aug 8, 2011Comments: There are many other tracks in Tasmania in a shocking state that need dire attention without creating more tracks for Parks to manage with the minimal resources they have. I think the proposed form will attract tourists, be more cost effective and will still incorporate the most scenic sections of the Tasman Peninsula. Its a win-win!Flag
-
31
Name: Elly Bolt on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Anonymous on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
33
Name:
Denis Mermet on Aug 8, 2011
Comments:Flag -
34
Name: JANET SLATON-SYLVA on Aug 8, 2011Comments: Please sign!!!!!!!!!!!Flag
-
35
Name: Alan Winstanley on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Tricia Lock on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
37
Name: Cathala Corine on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Wayne Thompson on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: Richard Pickup on Aug 8, 2011Comments: So sadFlag
-
40
Name: Lynn on Aug 8, 2011Comments: great causeFlag
-
41
Name: Jill Barrett on Aug 8, 2011Comments: I support the development of day-walk opportunities on the Tasman Peninsula which will bring greater economic return to Tasman PeninsulaFlag
-
42
Name: Bev Brewis on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
43
Name:
Janet Drummond on Aug 8, 2011
Comments:Flag -
44
Name: Janet Drummond on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
45
Name: Matthew Watton on Aug 8, 2011Comments: Tasmania is bankrupt. If we can't afford our hospitals & school why would we spend money on tracks that already exist???Flag
-
46
Name: Lynda Blyth on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Richard Boldys on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Mijanou Bauchau on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Toutain on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Anonymous on Aug 8, 2011Comments:Flag