Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 96 total

Page: 1, 2

  1. 1
    Name: Councillor Richard Bingley on Nov 20, 2006
    Comments: Please can any residents let me know if they are affected by the proposed closure of this route so I can feed this back to bus company Arriva and Thurrock Borough Council, who I am asking to step in and meet with Arriva to find a solution, rather than cutting our community's bus service. Thanks, Richard
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Cllr.G Gambier on Nov 20, 2006
    Comments: Sometimes we need to keep a Service that benefits the less fortunate in our Community.
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Marion Canavon on Nov 21, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Cllr Bukky Okunade on Nov 22, 2006
    Comments: I would not like to see the bus 377 running from Tilbury to Grays and Lakeside axed. People visiting, living and/or working in Tilbury rely on the bus as one of the means of getting out and about. I hope the bus company will reconsider their decision.
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Elizabeth Hosford on Nov 23, 2006
    Comments: Since the 383 Bus changed its route, the 377 is the only regular public transport source down into Grays from the Ridgeway, Dartview Close area. This service should not be axed
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 23, 2006
    Comments: I use the 377 to go to Grays Station and home again and use the stop on Chadwell Road, the only alternative I know of is the 383 and this stops the other side of woodview,If they axe the 377 there will be not suitable service for the people who live on this route and it would also add to the journey time
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 24, 2006
    Comments: I've used this route for years. Don't take yet another good service away.
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Kirsty on Nov 24, 2006
    Comments: i need this bus to get to college everyday. the bus time change was a great idea as it makes it so much more conveniant to get there. however the bus time change (every 15 mins) wouldnt work with just the 383 running in that area. as well as this, 383 tends to sometimes take twice as long to get within the area of my college whereas 377 tends to get there promptly
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Abigail Leighton on Nov 24, 2006
    Comments: I am glad that somebody is trying to do something to save this bus route. As at 7:30 in the morning there is no over bus route for me to get to work. And as Winter is drawing closer i am not willing to do a half an hour walk in the freezing cold.
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Debra Leighton on Nov 24, 2006
    Comments: Yes i am the Mother of Abigail Leighton, and i am also glad that someone is dong something about this, as well as quiet a lot of people are as well. The only problem i see is that this online petition is a great idea but what about those who can not use a computer How will they be able to have their say Either way i hope that Arriva will change their mind as many people use this bus on a regular basis, my daughter used it when she went to college and now she use's it to get to work. It's only a short journey from tilbury to chadwell, but if she has to work it in the early hour's of the morning in the cold this is not good for her legs as se has arthuritus. And when my daughter send arriva a email all they had to say was " Miss Leighton, I can confirm that the 377 route will be withdrawn, and a revised timetable will be introduced on the 383 service. Shona Curtis Customer Service Supervisor ARRIVA the Shires & Essex DD 01582 587120 FAX 01582 587025"
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 24, 2006
    Comments: Please keep the 377
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Shirley Pender on Nov 26, 2006
    Comments: When will consideration be given to those of us that DO NOT drive motor vehicles. We are asked not to create more pollution by driving cars and use buses etc but what are we supossed to do when Tilbury becomes almost inaccesible without cars after tea time.
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Cllr Val Liddiard on Nov 27, 2006
    Comments: Providing access to services and facilities is a government priority. Many people living in Tilbury rely on public transport to get to Grays for key public services and employment. It is imperative that Arriva and the Council work together to find a solution to any problems that risk withdrawal of key bus routes from the town. Withdrawal of public transport is not the answer - perhaps more subsidies are required from the government - we need to identify the root cause of sustainability for our bus services and work to achieve this.
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Sukie Sohal on Nov 27, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: James Duncan, Head Of Passenger Transport, Thurrock Council on Nov 27, 2006
    Comments: Service 377, which Arriva have operated commercially - that is without any subsidy from Thurrock Council - will end in December. This decision is a commercial one by Arriva with no input from the Council, and is based on the level of income they are getting compared with the costs of providing the service. The Council could, if it was felt appropriate, seek tenders for a replacement service to ensure that local residents and businesses are not left isolated. However in this particular case, an alternative bus route is the Service 77 operated by Ensignbus (the pale blue and silver buses). Ensign started this service in July 2006 and operate every 30 minutes during the bulk of the day - between 06.00 and 20.00 plus additional evening services - with a very similar level of service to that provided by Arriva and over an almost identical route. In addition, Ensignbus now operate another route, Service 66, between Tilbury and Grays/Lakeside via Little Thurrock. Both these services call at Civic Square in Tilbury. There is also a third service, operated by Imperial Bus Company as Service 320, which operates by a different route between Tilbury and Grays / Lakeside. In the absence of Arriva, the provision for bus passengers along the route is no worse - in fact it's considerably better for most locations - with Ensignbus than has been the case for a long time when Arriva were the only operator in the area, and thus I do not see that it would be appropriate for the Council to intervene.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2006
    Comments: I use the 377 about 10 times a week and it will make my journey to and from work more difficult if it is withdrawn
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Margaret Spencer on Nov 27, 2006
    Comments: I use the 377 about 10 times a week and it will make my journey to and from work more difficult if it is withdrawn
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Abigail Leighton on Nov 27, 2006
    Comments: To James Duncan, Head of Passenger Transport, Thurrock Council, I have read your comment on the 377 bus route. I am still not satisfied due to the fact that the 320 may go past me but does not go any where near my bus stop which is the Cross Kays pub! And as far as the 66 bus route, when i go to work it does not go my way untill after 10am, and as for the 77 bus route, i do not see why i should have to make my journey any longer than i already do. Walking to Civic Square will add an extra 20mins to my journey to and from work. And I have spoken to various bus drivers and they say that you will not be putting the 383 as far as calcutta (my stop) and that you have not even revised a new timetable, and as there is only 2 more weeks until you supposedly cancel this bus, i believe you should get a move on and inform all your drivers and passengers.
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 27, 2006
    Comments: i think there is somethin that people should know on this petiton, that is the 377 is not da only service from Tilbury. The blue 77 bus is exactly the same and it does go through cross keys. this councillor is talking rubbish, anyone would tink that 377 is the only bus there is!!!
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Mark Williams on Nov 28, 2006
    Comments: I am saddened by the loss of this bus route, many people rely on the service to get them to and from work, the other route do not cover the same route, nor do they deliver in the early mornings or late evenings. The removal of this route will create another daming block to the oppertunities avalable to people in the Tilbury area, impact on the most vulnerable and further isolate our community. The loss of this route will leave people stranded and create again a second class service. Shame on you.
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Abigail Leighton on Nov 28, 2006
    Comments: to the person who is anonymous after me, yes you are correct there is another bus service, the 77, but those who do not live by civic square will have to make an extra journey! if u had read what i said, den you would have read it properly. early in the morning people are not willing to make an extra walk from a bus stop which is near them to a bus stop thats a further walk! Why should they when there is a bus stop near them which takes them to where they want to go i do not see why i should have to walk further than i have to, to get to a bus stop for me to get to work in Chadwell. The 77 does not come down to the Lansdowne School, and the bus service 66, does come passed lansdowne school but does not go upto Chadwell untill after 10am. so the only bus i can get is 377 from my area of Tilbury!
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Richard Bassett on Dec 1, 2006
    Comments: although I am from Stanford-le-Hope is this the thin end of the wedge. Is this the start of our governments new policy to ditch our cars and use our non existent public transport.
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Andrew Birch on Dec 7, 2006
    Comments: i am discusted to hear that the 377 is to be closed as my 14yr old son depends on the service to take him to thurrock tech college as we live in south ockendon and it is part of his education as there is no other bus that goes to the college and which means that his education will be affected and i thought that education is a main part in any childs life
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Qdfveyuiwtp on Mar 16, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Rimonabant Fat Loss on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Rimonabant Buy Online on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Viagra And Cad on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Tretinoin on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Xenical on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Nexium And Alcohol on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Tetracycline Tooth Whitening on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Valium Without A Prescription on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Nolvadex on Mar 20, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Oxytetracycline on Mar 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Diazepam Clearance on Mar 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Reductil on Mar 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Rimonabant 20 Mg on Mar 21, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Vasdusido on Mar 22, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Ujwmgmysaz on Mar 22, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Kaospwieus on Mar 23, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Juiesywtsgg on Mar 23, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Avian Tamiflu on Mar 24, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Generic Valtrex on Mar 24, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Information On Reductil on Mar 24, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Kolpweruity on Mar 25, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Dawreoridur on Mar 25, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Gatesipeod on Mar 25, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Nayeuwisjdu on Mar 25, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Haueiofaraye on Mar 26, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: AgTgaterido on Mar 26, 2010
    Comments:
    Flag

Page: 1, 2

Sponsored links