JWPS Community

Signatures 1287 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 26 › »

1. 101
   Name: Nicholas Woloschuk on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Glenn Hooper on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Whitney Grove Woloschuk on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments: Regarding full day kindergarden in ward 8, JWPS has shown that it can cooperate internally, and accommodate future student capacity by making only a few changes to classroom use, and other room layouts. Please remove JWPS from any formal TDSB discussion.

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Diane Pooles on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments: We cannot see our children walking miles to a school when their home base is 3 blocks away. Do not hurt our neighborhood. It is strong and valuable to the community.

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Ian Pooles on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments: Our children deserve to be able to walk to school. It is one of the pleasures and rights of our kids who's parents bought in this neighborhood at great cost. Our kids need this and deserve this in our city. 4 blocks is walkable for our young kids and we must keep the borders as they are set now. We must protect our children's rights to a family friendly right of passage in their school years.

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Elizabeth Isaacs on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments: I commend the volunteers and JWPS staff for looking for AND finding the capacity to be able to accomodate the additional students and not tear apart our tight-knit community. I would hope that the TDSB takes advantage of this opportunity, and leave JWPS to implement its solution.

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Tina Lenehan on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Allison Lenehan on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Anne Greenwood on Jan 7, 2013

   Comments: I strongly urge that JWPS be removed from the Formal Discussions, given that the JWPS School Council, a Committee of the Council that studied physical space planning at the school, and the JWPS Principal - have all shown that JWPS can provide the required space to accommodate FDK and future student growth, without having to resort to consequences that might include: changing catchment boundaries (and having to send our children to other schools; bussing our children to schools other than JWPS; walking or driving much further to other schools; adding portables to our schoolyard; eliminating Child Care; changing the education path (which currently permits JWPS graduate students to attend Glenview and then Lawrence Park) so that our children will have to attend other grade 7-8 and grade 9-12 schools much further away; or eliminating other programs, services or grades.

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Vanessa Norris on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Amanda James on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: John Burgess on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Jan Scharlach on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Rebecca Rycroft on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Elizabeth Hunter on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments: We chose to live in this neighbourhood because of the fantastic community atmosphere, which is largely centred around John Wanless PS. This is an excellent school and we want our child and future children to attend. To change our school district will affect the education of my child, and my family's personal wealth through the value of our home. Please do not rezone our school district.

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Robert Beiles on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Joyce Loh on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Marc Isaacs on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Michael Finlay on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Fred Wuertz on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments: I feel that it is important that elementary schools be within walking distance even for kindergarten age children

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Alison Lim-Nguyen on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Renee Dargie on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Ray Fischer on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments: In addition to what has already been said, a boundary change would have a material financial impact on EVERY homeowner whose home is moved out of the JWPS district - not just those homes with children. Why? Because, by removing a KEY reason for having bought the home originally (that is, to have access to JWPS), the homes would become LESS desirable. Less desirable = less valuable. Over the 100+ homes that would be affected, that would amount to a huge financial burden on EVERY affected homeowner.

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Sahar Gaya on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Mark Stechishin on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Misty Brett on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Cheryl Fernandes-Stechishin on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments: I bought this house in 2011, for a great deal of money to be in catchment for the school district Old Ochard falls under!

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Anita Kawale on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Susan Sweet on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Frances Pyrsos on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Jillian Bates on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Danny Pyrsos on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Upen Kawale on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Josie Bohm on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Kim Van Leeuwen on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Ani Rock on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Rebecca Cutler on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Mahitha Gokulachandra on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Craig Doidge on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Marjorie MacIsaac on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Charlotte Watson on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Ann Meuser on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments: The decision to remove children from John Wanless does not make sense. The children are all part of the same community, walk together, play together etc.Removing the children to a different school makes no sense.

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Ann Meuser on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments: The decision to remove children from John Wanless does not make sense. The children are all part of the same community, walk together, play together etc.Removing the children to a different school makes no sense.

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Terry Hemingway on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments: It would be tragic to lose the neighbourhood spirit that could be destroyed if some children in the JWPS catchment area are forced to go to another school outside their community. All children have the right to attend a local school that they can walk to with their friends and other children. This is clearly beneficial to their sense of themselves and their "belonging" as well as their connection to, and sense of security in, their environment.

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: James Coady on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments: Keep our community together!

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Marian R.W. Archbold on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments: President JWPS Parent's Association 1989-90; I believe the integrity of school boundaries and pathways are vital to the sense of community in this neighbourhood.

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Graeme Huycke on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Ramona OSS on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Ramona OSS on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ... 26 › »