Support JPK

Signatures 231 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 51
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 52
   Name: Ian Frampton on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments: I wholeheartedly support the JPK Project and feel the decision by the council's planning committee to vote against this is purely forced by a few individuals. Families lives are at stake here and the sooner this is sorted out the better.

   Flag
3. 53
   Name: Mrs Hazel Jelly on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments: this project is very deserving of our support, and the site chosen is ideal, this section of of our society need our help and support to enable them to live independent lives when they no langer have family

   Flag
4. 54
   Name: Mary Peck on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 55
   Name: Jackie Bevan on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments: This wonderful project must succeed. A few shortsighted people must not be allowed to spoil a certain,fulfilling future for the learning disabled.

   Flag
6. 56
   Name: Alfred Parker on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments: A most worthy and much needed project.There are a potential 140 clients needing this in this area

   Flag
7. 57
   Name: Alfred Parker on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments: A most worthy and much needed project.There are a potential 140 clients needing this in this area

   Flag
8. 58
   Name: Sylvia Westley on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments: a very worthy project

   Flag
9. 59
   Name: Beryl Edmondson on Jan 24, 2013

   Comments: Happy to lend our support - this has been a long time in the planning. Good luck

   Flag
10. 60
    Name: Mrs. M. Clive-Matthews on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments: A desperately needed and worthwhile project. I cannot understand why the planning committee went against the recommendations of the Head of Planning and the Highway Authority. All the reasons given for turning down the planning application had already been met.

    Flag
11. 61
    Name: Mr. N. Clive-Matthews on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments: A desperately needed and worthwhile project. I cannot understand why the planning committee went against the recommendations of the Head of Planning and the Highway Authority. All the reasons given for turning down the planning application had already been met.

    Flag
12. 62
    Name: M.males on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 63
    Name: Joyce Taylor on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 64
    Name: J.males on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 65
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments: The JPK has suffered so many setbacks it is a shame if this is another.

    Flag
16. 66
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 67
    Name: Jackie Begin on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments: Only good can come out of this and will benefit all those that are lucky enough to be able to live in this accommodation.

    Flag
18. 68
    Name: Pierre Begin on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments: This will benefit those less fortunate than ourselves. We should all be grateful we do not face worrying about what happens to our loved ones when we are gone.

    Flag
19. 69
    Name: John Newman on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments: It is difficult to see what rational objections can be formulated for not allowing this very worthwhile project to support those with learning disabilities. I would be interested to hear the details of the objections.

    Flag
20. 70
    Name: Robin CM on Jan 24, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 71
    Name: Yvonne Cane-Hardy on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 72
    Name: John Riddick & Carol Riddick on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: This is a much needed facility for people with learning disabilities later in their lives. Local residents will not be disadvantaged by the introduction of this housing and most recognize that the need for the provision of care for those unable to look after themselves is axiomatic in any civilized society. This should be achieved within the community and not be 'conveniently' thrust away into some dark corner.

    Flag
23. 73
    Name: John Riddick & Carol Riddick on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: This is a much needed facility for people with learning disabilities later in their lives. Local residents will not be disadvantaged by the introduction of this housing and most recognize that the need for the provision of care for those unable to look after themselves is axiomatic in any civilized society. This should be achieved within the community and not be 'conveniently' thrust away into some dark corner.

    Flag
24. 74
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: A very much needed facility

    Flag
25. 75
    Name: Margaret Reader on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: This project is vitally needed in our society today where the disadvantaged need to be cared for in a place where their needs will be met with dignity.

    Flag
26. 76
    Name: Ian Jones on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: Please ask the local residents if there objections would be as vociferous if they had a child with learning difficulties.

    Flag
27. 77
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: JPK has a proven track record (Chalk Farm). This initiative is long overdue and should be receiving full support of the community as a whole instead of the paranoid NIMBY-ism being displayed.

    Flag
28. 78
    Name: Samantha Kennerson on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 79
    Name: Ingrid Shaylor on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: Good Luck with the project which will bring so much relief, support and hope to so many people in need of help. It is very sad that some local residents have lost their compassion and understanding.

    Flag
30. 80
    Name: Jean Brown on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: I support this project wholeheartedly, it is a much needed resource for young people with a learning disability.

    Flag
31. 81
    Name: Christine Stevens on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: I would like to register my support for this development which is desperately needed for people with learning disabilities. I am very disappointed to hear that Eastbourne Borough Council have not approved the plan submitted and have failed to commit themselves to helping some of the more vulnerable residents in their environs. I have been a resident in Eastbourne for nearly 40 years and am ashamed that this project is not proceeding with the full assistance and encouragement from EBC.

    Flag
32. 82
    Name: Robert Watts on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: You have my whole hearted support for your laudable and very necessary project to provide accommodation and a future for those less fortunate than ourselves who through no fault of their own find themselves reliant on others. The hostile and very loud reaction of a few unenlightened local individuals to the proposed works scheme has included the aggressive use of misleading unattributable mail shots utilising the addresses of JPK supporters from the Eastbourne Borough Council website, the propagation of misinformation and a vitriolic and misleading letter campaign in the local press. Shame on you and the local politicians who gave you credence and voted against the planning application. I now hope for an impartial decision on behalf of the Planning Inspector based on the facts of the case and which validates the recommendation of the Council's professional planning officers.

    Flag
33. 83
    Name: Suzanne Watts on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: You have my whole hearted support for your laudable and very necessary project to provide accommodation and a future for those less fortunate than ourselves who through no fault of their own find themselves reliant on others. The hostile and very loud reaction of a few unenlightened local individuals to the proposed works scheme has included the aggressive use of misleading unattributable mail shots utilising the addresses of JPK supporters from the Eastbourne Borough Council website, the propagation of misinformation and a vitriolic and misleading letter campaign in the local press. Shame on you and the local politicians who gave you credence and voted against the planning application. I now hope for an impartial decision on behalf of the Planning Inspector based on the facts of the case and which validates the recommendation of the Council's professional planning officers.

    Flag
34. 84
    Name: Claire Watts on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 85
    Name: James Watts on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 86
    Name: Tim Dunford on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: Common sense - build the JPK Project! Don't let prejudice and lies heap misery on people who - through no fault of their own - can't look after themselves.

    Flag
37. 87
    Name: Julie Dunford on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 88
    Name: Stephen Watts on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 89
    Name: Miss Carol Short on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: This is an idea to be encouraged a real home for people less able to look after themselves. It saves the Council money for "residential" it has trustees and the people unable to provide a home for themselves have a way to access more encouragement and learning as they grow through life. The building has been designed in the best of taste and it is such a pity that people cannot understand the needs of our adults, which so easily could have been the needs of one of theirs. The parking issues are exaggerated and the point that the neighbours are making show just an extreme lack of compassion for those less fortunate than themselves. A severe case of Not In My Back Yard. This is a hard knock for JPK who have worked tirelessly for many years to secure a piece of land, this time with the Church on their side and a supermarket backing off to allow JPK to purchase but yet a few would be neighbours in the vicinity have taken it upon themselves to try to destroy these dreams probably having no idea of how difficult it is to procure accommodation from "The Powers that Be" and this in fact an idea that would empower a lot of worried parents who like myself is a single Mum and will have no-one to watch my son when I am no longer here. We worry constantly and if only these people knew what stress and hard work it is to keep a child who grows to adulthood with learning difficulties at home then maybe they would think differently. Shame on them. They will be accompanied at all times and are no threat to anybody. Shame on these people. I implore you to rethink your decision on this appeal.

    Flag
40. 90
    Name: John Park on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 91
    Name: Alex Davis on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 92
    Name: Sarah Jones on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: please support this wonderful project.

    Flag
43. 93
    Name: Victoria Crouch on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 94
    Name: Stuart Davey on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 95
    Name: Carl Davies on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 96
    Name: Kate on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 97
    Name: Harriet Clapp on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 98
    Name: Pam Lulham on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: This is a much needed facility for those people with learning difficulties to lead independent lives.

    Flag
49. 99
    Name: Pam Lulham on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments: This is a much needed facility for those with learning difficulties who wish to lead independent lives.

    Flag
50. 100
    Name: Alicia Parris on Jan 26, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »