John Roan Campaign

Signatures 688 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 14 › »

1. 151
   Name: Dave Davis on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: Shame on you Greenwich Council. You're taking the money from the site and running....away from your responsibilities to the kids

   Flag
2. 152
   Name: Toby Davies on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: This is a disgrace. The size and location of the new school are wholly inadequate. That the Council are undertaking this without consultation is disappointingly familiar.

   Flag
3. 153
   Name: Debbie Towersey on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: The pupils of the school must come before anything else - people are more important then money!!!

   Flag
4. 154
   Name: Jane Speakman on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 155
   Name: Marian Marian on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: why aren't the parents being consulted or at least being party to the rebuilding plans and timetable,,,,, is it necessary to have a new school at all

   Flag
6. 156
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 157
   Name: Anonymous on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: This is clearly an idea that is not militated by the needs of the children but of freeing up valuable development land. The fact that there has been little if any publicity of this issue leads one to wonder when our locally elected leaders were going to tell the community about this move and have a proper and transparent debate about what should happen to John Roan school and how to improve the standards at this school in order that local people will want to send their children to this school.

   Flag
8. 158
   Name: Marina Rosa on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: Think of the children - they are our future. What you do to them, you do to all of us.

   Flag
9. 159
   Name: Tom Dingley on Mar 26, 2007

   Comments: Don't fix what isnt broken! Yes the school needs some updating, but the location works well and does not effect the local surroundings. Moving the sight will disrupt the school's natural way of life, and also disrupt the local area as the building work commences on the maze Hill and WCP sites.

   Flag
10. 160
    Name: Jamie Henry on Mar 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 161
    Name: Johnny Khakh on Mar 26, 2007

    Comments: I was a student at this school, and where it is built is suitable for John Roan to be. I believe that John Roan just needs to be improved, not re-built. Improvements such as change of Head Teacher, but there's another petition for that. Please keep the school where it is, thank you!

    Flag
12. 162
    Name: Louise Hussey on Mar 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 163
    Name: Shona Newmark on Mar 26, 2007

    Comments: The design for the new peninsula school needs to include significantly more out door space and be moved to a safe and healthy environment before it can be considered viable.

    Flag
14. 164
    Name: Cheryl Deedman on Mar 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 165
    Name: Anne Berndt on Mar 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 166
    Name: Holly Coyne on Mar 26, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 167
    Name: Debra McGlone on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 168
    Name: Debra McGlone on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 169
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 170
    Name: Maureen Cahalane on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: There is no reason why it should be developed on the existing site.

    Flag
21. 171
    Name: Maureen Cahalane on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: There is no reason why it should be developed on the existing site.

    Flag
22. 172
    Name: Deborah Wallis on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 173
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: I am shocked to hear of the Council's plans to move the School to the peninsula. At the moment, the children are so fortunate to have so much space, to be surrounded by so much fresh air, and to be surrounded by such serenity. What a terrible thing to move them to the peninsula where they would lose all these assets.

    Flag
24. 174
    Name: Alison Perry on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: We also have a campaign in place to stop the council relocating a school from Plumstead to the Hervey Road Sports field. Why don't they move the Plumstead school to the pennisula and we'd all be happy! We have had no public consultation and very little information from the council.

    Flag
25. 175
    Name: Ms.j.sion on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 176
    Name: Julia Brundell on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: This is an awful idea and makes it quite apparent that the Council puts our children's education at the bottom of its priorities. I would have thought that an Borough whose secondary school results are as poor as Greenwich's have been for many years, would be seeking ways to encourage local parents to use the local schools, rather than the opposite.

    Flag
27. 177
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 178
    Name: Joe Gomme on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Moving out of the community centre, more car use to get to school, smaller site, polluted air and much less space, health impacts on the kids, loss of local tradition... how does the Council justify all this

    Flag
29. 179
    Name: Arlene Martin on Mar 27, 2007

    Comments: Children are our future - let's acknowledge and respect that and do what is right for them which is not the planned move.

    Flag
30. 180
    Name: John Edwards on Mar 28, 2007

    Comments: I was a pupil at Charlton Boys School in the 1960's. The school later merged with John Roan. The school, which was on two sites, was located in a heavily industrial area on the Woolwich Road and with hindsight I am convinced that this contributed to a significant worsening of my asthma during that period. It is madness to repeat history and relocate John Roan to an area that will risk the health of students. This proposal must be abandoned and re-thought.

    Flag
31. 181
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 28, 2007

    Comments: This is all about the trust and Greenwich being able to get their hands on a load of cash by selling off the current site. plans for the new school are not fit for purpose but then neither is the strategic management in the LA

    Flag
32. 182
    Name: Anthony Galvin on Mar 28, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 183
    Name: Beryl Ann Scott on Mar 29, 2007

    Comments: As Headteacher of Roan Girls' School (1975-1979) I was involved in the comprehensivisation of the school and its amalgamation with the Boys' school. To be part of John Roan's vision for the education of 'the poor children' of Greenwich was the guiding principle of my tenure of office and I am horrified by the proposals for the future of the school and its repercussions for students and staff.

    Flag
34. 184
    Name: Susie Wilson on Mar 29, 2007

    Comments: Once again Greenwich is putting housing before schools, hospitals and sport.

    Flag
35. 185
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 29, 2007

    Comments: Once again Greenwich is putting housing before schools, hospitals and sport.

    Flag
36. 186
    Name: Derek Fordham on Mar 29, 2007

    Comments: No immediate comment. It is unbelievable!

    Flag
37. 187
    Name: Maureen Cahalane on Mar 29, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 188
    Name: Mark V Brown on Mar 29, 2007

    Comments: It is about time that the council stopped ripping the guts out of Greenwich for monetary gain and started putting the needs of the community they are meant to serve ,first.

    Flag
39. 189
    Name: Mike Leach on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 190
    Name: Kevin Jacques on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Must be completely political reasons for the new location as itmakes no sense whatsoever from a logical or educational point of view.

    Flag
41. 191
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: i am a pupil of john roan and am astounded that the school would consider such an abominable move. bth for staff and pupils.

    Flag
42. 192
    Name: John Cargill on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: The school governors need to wake up to their responsibilities, and act on behalf of the pupil and parent community.

    Flag
43. 193
    Name: Stella Long on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: Concerns about the air quality on the proposed site for the re-build of John Roan School are of particular concern to parents, pupils and staff. I am a teacher in two local primary schools, have heard much concern from parents in both playgrounds especially regarding air quality and lack of space on the proposed new site and my sympathies are with them.

    Flag
44. 194
    Name: Ruth Harrison on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 195
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 30, 2007

    Comments: I strongly feel that ther needs to be a full and honest consultation process with local residents about the future of john roan school.

    Flag
46. 196
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments: I totally disapprove of the proposal.

    Flag
47. 197
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments: why can't we improve on the sites we've got and whats this about a playground being on the roofodd!

    Flag
48. 198
    Name: P Matthews on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments: utter curruption!

    Flag
49. 199
    Name: Oluwatoyin Babatunde on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments: If the school are moving to big aria that is understandable but moving to a smaller place does not make any sence to me.

    Flag
50. 200
    Name: Victor on Mar 31, 2007

    Comments: This move makes absolutely no sense, the logic in which the decision is being made is severely flawed, these conditions are not apporpriate for children

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, ... 14 › »