| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | Andrew Steeds | All power to your elbow! At the very least, let's hope this forces the Council to give a full explanation of their reasons for wanting to move the school. |
| 2 | Caroline Cooper | |
| 3 | Susan Godin | |
| 4 | James Brown | |
| 5 | caroline | |
| 6 | Diana Greaves | |
| 7 | Linda | |
| 8 | Ellie Brown | |
| 9 | Anonymous | The Government tells us that "Every Child Matters".
Seemingly not in Greenwich, however.
The proposed move is clearly not in the interest of the pupils... so one has to wonder which other interests are being served instead. |
| 10 | Mrs. L Gordon-Mackenzie | To move the school from the heart of the community to a desolate, polluted, congested waste ground would be catastrophic for students and their future educational development. |
| 11 | Miranda Stamp | I have a friend whose son is expected to be going to go to this school in a few years time as it is their local school. I can't understand the logic of moving to a smaller site with lack of play area when already this country has an obesity problem. |
| 12 | Clym Mackenzie | |
| 13 | Bill Rynne | |
| 14 | kim larrad | |
| 15 | C F | |
| 16 | Mat Webb | |
| 17 | Susan Wilson | |
| 18 | Vanessa Purton | |
| 19 | Mrs R L Cutler | Save the school! |
| 20 | Maureen Stapleton | The fact that the primary school on the peninsula has a much bigger footprint than the proposed John Roan strikes me both as unfair and ridiculous. Keep the John Roan where it is! |
| 21 | Angela Sweeney | |
| 22 | Anonymous | |
| 23 | Michelle Brooks Evans | |
| 24 | Laura Park | |
| 25 | Anonymous | |
| 26 | Anonymous | |
| 27 | Anonymous | This is just another sign of the world having gone bonkers. Is this how little you value the next generation? |
| 28 | Bill Evans | |
| 29 | Bill Rynne | Keep the school where it is in the centre of a thriving community |
| 30 | Mr. O Gordon | |
| 31 | Anonymous | |
| 32 | Carl Shoben | |
| 33 | Geoff Chapman | |
| 34 | Anonymous | Disgusting to even consider this site |
| 35 | Nick Fox | |
| 36 | Polly Wines | |
| 37 | M A Howell | Spend the money on the existing site. Save the school |
| 38 | Jessica Webb | The current School's location is obviously to the benefit of the children and the move would be to their disbenefit. Do not put other values over the quality of education. |
| 39 | Josie Jones | |
| 40 | Kate Brian | |
| 41 | Anonymous | |
| 42 | troy gordon | We need to keep this good community school in the heart of the community |
| 43 | Barrie O'Neil | As a parent who supports the comprehensive system, I feel the new site would further reduce the suitable state options available to children living in West Greenwich.
How can you sentence your child to a site so totally inadequate in terms of health, the criminal lack of outdoor space and the inspiration of being on the edge of an industrial hinterland.
I have no objection to the new school being built in the penisular, but the site offered needs to be completely rethought and is both an insult to our children and also to our intelligence. |
| 44 | Anonymous | |
| 45 | Sally Hughes | |
| 46 | Anonymous | |
| 47 | burnand | |
| 48 | Mel Hawke | It's disgusting |
| 49 | gen | I don't understand why, if they can't build houses on the peninsula for ten years, then how can they transfer over 1000 students. |
| 50 | Hiromi Matsumura-Mackenzie | I support to oppose the planned move of the John Roan School to the Peninsula! |