Signatures 688 total
-
1
Name: Caroline Evans on Mar 14, 2007Comments: what a great facility!Flag
-
2
Name: Andrew Steeds on Mar 14, 2007Comments: All power to your elbow! At the very least, let's hope this forces the Council to give a full explanation of their reasons for wanting to move the school.Flag
-
3
Name: Caroline Cooper on Mar 14, 2007Comments:Flag
-
4
Name: Susan Godin on Mar 15, 2007Comments:Flag
-
5
Name: James Brown on Mar 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
6
Name: Caroline on Mar 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
7
Name: Diana Greaves on Mar 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
8
Name: Linda on Mar 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
9
Name: Ellie Brown on Mar 16, 2007Comments:Flag
-
10
Name: Anonymous on Mar 17, 2007Comments: The Government tells us that "Every Child Matters". Seemingly not in Greenwich, however. The proposed move is clearly not in the interest of the pupils... so one has to wonder which other interests are being served instead.Flag
-
11
Name: Mrs. L Gordon-Mackenzie on Mar 18, 2007Comments: To move the school from the heart of the community to a desolate, polluted, congested waste ground would be catastrophic for students and their future educational development.Flag
-
12
Name: Miranda Stamp on Mar 18, 2007Comments: I have a friend whose son is expected to be going to go to this school in a few years time as it is their local school. I can't understand the logic of moving to a smaller site with lack of play area when already this country has an obesity problem.Flag
-
13
Name: Clym Mackenzie on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
14
Name: Bill Rynne on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
15
Name: Kim Larrad on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
16
Name: C F on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
17
Name: Mat Webb on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
18
Name: Susan Wilson on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
19
Name: Vanessa Purton on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
20
Name: Mrs R L Cutler on Mar 18, 2007Comments: Save the school!Flag
-
21
Name: Maureen Stapleton on Mar 18, 2007Comments: The fact that the primary school on the peninsula has a much bigger footprint than the proposed John Roan strikes me both as unfair and ridiculous. Keep the John Roan where it is!Flag
-
22
Name: Angela Sweeney on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
23
Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
24
Name: Michelle Brooks Evans on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
25
Name: Laura Park on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
26
Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
27
Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
28
Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007Comments: This is just another sign of the world having gone bonkers. Is this how little you value the next generationFlag
-
29
Name: Bill Evans on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
30
Name: Bill Rynne on Mar 18, 2007Comments: Keep the school where it is in the centre of a thriving communityFlag
-
31
Name: Mr. O Gordon on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
32
Name: Bill Evans on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
33
Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007Comments:Flag
-
34
Name: Carl Shoben on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
35
Name: Geoff Chapman on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
36
Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007Comments: Disgusting to even consider this siteFlag
-
37
Name: Nick Fox on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
38
Name: Polly Wines on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
39
Name: M A Howell on Mar 19, 2007Comments: Spend the money on the existing site. Save the schoolFlag
-
40
Name: Jessica Webb on Mar 19, 2007Comments: The current School's location is obviously to the benefit of the children and the move would be to their disbenefit. Do not put other values over the quality of education.Flag
-
41
Name: Josie Jones on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
42
Name: Kate Brian on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
43
Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
44
Name: Troy Gordon on Mar 19, 2007Comments: We need to keep this good community school in the heart of the communityFlag
-
45
Name: Barrie O'Neil on Mar 19, 2007Comments: As a parent who supports the comprehensive system, I feel the new site would further reduce the suitable state options available to children living in West Greenwich. How can you sentence your child to a site so totally inadequate in terms of health, the criminal lack of outdoor space and the inspiration of being on the edge of an industrial hinterland. I have no objection to the new school being built in the penisular, but the site offered needs to be completely rethought and is both an insult to our children and also to our intelligence.Flag
-
46
Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
47
Name: Sally Hughes on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
48
Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
49
Name: Burnand on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag
-
50
Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007Comments:Flag