Signatures 688 total
- 1
-
2
Name: Andrew Steeds on Mar 14, 2007Comments: All power to your elbow! At the very least, let's hope this forces the Council to give a full explanation of their reasons for wanting to move the school.Flag
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
-
10
Name: Anonymous on Mar 17, 2007Comments: The Government tells us that "Every Child Matters". Seemingly not in Greenwich, however. The proposed move is clearly not in the interest of the pupils... so one has to wonder which other interests are being served instead.Flag
-
11
Name: Mrs. L Gordon-Mackenzie on Mar 18, 2007Comments: To move the school from the heart of the community to a desolate, polluted, congested waste ground would be catastrophic for students and their future educational development.Flag
-
12
Name: Miranda Stamp on Mar 18, 2007Comments: I have a friend whose son is expected to be going to go to this school in a few years time as it is their local school. I can't understand the logic of moving to a smaller site with lack of play area when already this country has an obesity problem.Flag
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
-
21
Name: Maureen Stapleton on Mar 18, 2007Comments: The fact that the primary school on the peninsula has a much bigger footprint than the proposed John Roan strikes me both as unfair and ridiculous. Keep the John Roan where it is!Flag
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
-
28
Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007Comments: This is just another sign of the world having gone bonkers. Is this how little you value the next generationFlag
- 29
-
30
Name: Bill Rynne on Mar 18, 2007Comments: Keep the school where it is in the centre of a thriving communityFlag
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
-
39
Name: M A Howell on Mar 19, 2007Comments: Spend the money on the existing site. Save the schoolFlag
-
40
Name: Jessica Webb on Mar 19, 2007Comments: The current School's location is obviously to the benefit of the children and the move would be to their disbenefit. Do not put other values over the quality of education.Flag
- 41
- 42
- 43
-
44
Name: Troy Gordon on Mar 19, 2007Comments: We need to keep this good community school in the heart of the communityFlag
-
45
Name: Barrie O'Neil on Mar 19, 2007Comments: As a parent who supports the comprehensive system, I feel the new site would further reduce the suitable state options available to children living in West Greenwich. How can you sentence your child to a site so totally inadequate in terms of health, the criminal lack of outdoor space and the inspiration of being on the edge of an industrial hinterland. I have no objection to the new school being built in the penisular, but the site offered needs to be completely rethought and is both an insult to our children and also to our intelligence.Flag
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50