John Roan Campaign

Signatures 688 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 14 › »

1. 1
   Name: Caroline Evans on Mar 14, 2007

   Comments: what a great facility!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Andrew Steeds on Mar 14, 2007

   Comments: All power to your elbow! At the very least, let's hope this forces the Council to give a full explanation of their reasons for wanting to move the school.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Caroline Cooper on Mar 14, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Susan Godin on Mar 15, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: James Brown on Mar 16, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Caroline on Mar 16, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Diana Greaves on Mar 16, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Linda on Mar 16, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Ellie Brown on Mar 16, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 17, 2007

    Comments: The Government tells us that "Every Child Matters". Seemingly not in Greenwich, however. The proposed move is clearly not in the interest of the pupils... so one has to wonder which other interests are being served instead.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Mrs. L Gordon-Mackenzie on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments: To move the school from the heart of the community to a desolate, polluted, congested waste ground would be catastrophic for students and their future educational development.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Miranda Stamp on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments: I have a friend whose son is expected to be going to go to this school in a few years time as it is their local school. I can't understand the logic of moving to a smaller site with lack of play area when already this country has an obesity problem.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Clym Mackenzie on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Bill Rynne on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Kim Larrad on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: C F on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Mat Webb on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Susan Wilson on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Vanessa Purton on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Mrs R L Cutler on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments: Save the school!

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Maureen Stapleton on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments: The fact that the primary school on the peninsula has a much bigger footprint than the proposed John Roan strikes me both as unfair and ridiculous. Keep the John Roan where it is!

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Angela Sweeney on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Michelle Brooks Evans on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Laura Park on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments: This is just another sign of the world having gone bonkers. Is this how little you value the next generation

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Bill Evans on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Bill Rynne on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments: Keep the school where it is in the centre of a thriving community

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Mr. O Gordon on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Bill Evans on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 18, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Carl Shoben on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Geoff Chapman on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments: Disgusting to even consider this site

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Nick Fox on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Polly Wines on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: M A Howell on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments: Spend the money on the existing site. Save the school

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Jessica Webb on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments: The current School's location is obviously to the benefit of the children and the move would be to their disbenefit. Do not put other values over the quality of education.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Josie Jones on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Kate Brian on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Troy Gordon on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments: We need to keep this good community school in the heart of the community

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Barrie O'Neil on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments: As a parent who supports the comprehensive system, I feel the new site would further reduce the suitable state options available to children living in West Greenwich. How can you sentence your child to a site so totally inadequate in terms of health, the criminal lack of outdoor space and the inspiration of being on the edge of an industrial hinterland. I have no objection to the new school being built in the penisular, but the site offered needs to be completely rethought and is both an insult to our children and also to our intelligence.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Sally Hughes on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Burnand on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 19, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 14 › »