Signatures 62 total
Page: 1, 2
-
51
Name: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2009Name (Required): patricia e mitchellComments: the community has expressed over the years that we desired a reuse that would benefit the community directly. . . the neighborhood in which Cooke resides and not necessarily the greater washington area. We are opposed to the proposed reuse and would like to see a reuse that directly serves the neighborhood, like art gallaries or institutions that bring services directly to the community, coupled with neighborhood serving retail or restaurantsFlag
-
52
Name: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2009Name (Required): Karen HolmesComments: I think that before we create a new facility for troubled/disadvantaged youth we may want to take a look at the existing social services which exist in this neighborhood. Perhaps a more effective solution than creating another well-intentioned service should be reviewed.Flag
-
53
Name: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2009Name (Required): Joerg DrewekeComments: Our low-density residential neighborhood is already struggling to absorb the impact of existing social services providers that bring in large numbers of individuals from outside our community. Adding an additional large group of people in need of intense social supports threatens to completely overwhelm the neighborhood and could severely impact its viability as a livable community for those who live there.Flag
-
54
Name: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2009Name (Required): Austin PearlComments: If it was going to be the only social service program in the area that would be one thing. But our area has a grossly disproportionate number of such facilities. The rest of DC, Northern VA, and Southern MD should shoulder some of the burden. I for one would like to see this facility in the heart of Georgetown.Flag
-
55
Name: Anonymous on Aug 20, 2009Name (Required): GeorgeComments:Flag
-
56
Name: Anonymous on Aug 21, 2009Name (Required): Debbie HarmonComments:Flag
-
57
Name: Anonymous on Aug 21, 2009Name (Required): Kris HammondComments: KIPP Schools took the time to meet with all community members, including me when I was an ANC commissioner. KIPP would bring value to the community. In October 2008, KIPP DC said it intends to maximize the value of the site through the following: • Renovation of the existing space • Bringing mixed early childhood education (pre-K(3)-4th grade) / community use to the existing 43,500 square foot ("sf") building (over 400 students in existing building) • Ward 5 Community Theatre • Ward 5 Studio Art space • Ward 5 adult Professional Development / Small Business Incubation • Ward 5 Community Gardens • Metropolitan Police Department ("MPD") special access space for administrative • Ward 5 Community Meeting space • Build an approximately $7.1 million, 22,350 sf addition on the 2.5 acre site that would contain both additional early childhood education space (serving almost an additional 250 students in the same pre-k(3)-4th grade program); and • Ground Level Retail use that would complement the mixed use of the existing building (approximately 1000 sf)Flag
-
58
Name: Anonymous on Aug 22, 2009Name (Required): Nathan ZookComments:Flag
-
59
Name: Anonymous on Aug 24, 2009Name (Required): Martin Moulton, CCCA PresidentComments: Robin Eve Jasper, the Director of the DC Dept. of Real Estate Services, should personally meet with the community to discuss this issue without further delay.Flag
-
60
Name: Anonymous on Aug 30, 2009Name (Required): Kenneth KrattenmakerComments:Flag
-
61
Name: Mark Beavers on Apr 8, 2010Name (Required): Mark BeaversComments: This neighborhood cannot handle any addition social services. We would like to maintain some diversity for the benefit of all.Flag
-
62
Name: MacLaren Chatham on Dec 4, 2010Name (Required): Mac ChathamComments:Flag
Page: 1, 2