Keep JCP Beautiful - No Commercial Development

Signatures 578 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 12 › »

1. 1
   Name: Patrick Sweeney on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Wayne Stefanski on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments: I can't see any benefit to the residents of this community all we need is one more vacant piece of commercial property.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Melanie Lundgren on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments: I join the residents of the Parkes in Julington Creek Plantation in keeping this community a residential zone.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Kevin Glover on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Laura Glover on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Kelly And Daniel Flatt on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Kelly Redway on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments: There is already plenty of commercial property in the immediate area. Why establish more unnecessarily, particularly when it will so negatively impact the safety, aesthetic appeal, and home values for surrounding residential properties? Ridiculous.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Sherrie Venturi on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Jennifer Paliana on Feb 22, 2013

   Comments: We do not want businesses at the entrance of our neighborhood! There are plenty of empty store fronts and commercial properties for sale in St Johns!

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Kelly Barker on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Karl Rogers on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Christine Rementer on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Lynn Faust on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Liz Faust on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Cara Richardson on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: James Scribner on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Monica Boyajian on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Sarkis Boyajian on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Suzanne And Bill Marino on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: There is absolutely no reason why this should be happening within this community. We are proud homeowners who have only the best interests for our properties and our families. Building a commercial office at the Parkes' entrance does not fit our vision or what was promised when we purchased our homes. We are a strong and vocal neighborhood and we will fight with everything we've got to stop this from happening!

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Neil Luciano on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: Keep JCP & the entrance to The Parkes beautiful. the last thing our community needs is more empty office spaxe

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Scott Grenville on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: What a ridiculous idea! With all the empty commercial property in the area, why would anyone build more? And why in the entrance to a residential community??

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Laura Preslock on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Nicole Andrews on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Rebecca Thomas on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: Please stop with all this building!! - There are already so many empty buildings already to put to use!!

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Judy & Mike Chacinski on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: It's a little early for April Fools...I can't believe this guy thinks it's OK to do this!!!

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Susan Carroll on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: if this goes through there will be a lot of families leaving this community and will no longer be the beautiful area that people look for when purchasing a home. there is plenty of property already zoned for commercial at Racetrack and Flora Branch.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: George Barker on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Faye Szczepanik on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Don't destroy our beautiful entrance.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Faye Szczepanik on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Don't destroy our beautiful entrance to the Parkes.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Faye Szczepanik And Edward Szczepanik on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: We do not want the entrance to our neighborhood marred with a commercial building.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Kerry McClure on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Timothy McCrohan on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Julie McCullough on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Matthew Hinson on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Michele Hunt on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Please stop this from happening, it is a residential area. It is too close to the school and will increase traffic. It will also reduce our home values!

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Kevin Hunt on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Please stop this from happening, it is a residential area. It is too close to the school and will increase traffic. It will also reduce our home values!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Kenneth Hunt on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Please stop this from happening, it is a residential area. It is too close to the school and will increase traffic. It will also reduce our home values!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Maryanne LaPolla on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Please stop this from happening, it is a residential area. It is too close to the school and will increase traffic. It will also reduce our home values!

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Michael LaPolla on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: Please stop this from happening, it is a residential area. It is too close to the school and will increase traffic. It will also reduce our home values!

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Kevin Glover on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: We are starting to get the word out, please continue to talk to your friends/neighbors. We should be able to use this to keep this group updated on progress.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Angela G Chriest on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: This is the most rediculous proposal I have ever seen. This area is not for commercial development. This is a subdivision. Property is too small and too close to homes for a commercial building.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Mark Groves on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: John Willis on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: The whole reason I purchased in JCP was to get away from commercial properties. This is not what I want to see in our neighborhood.

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Roy Kiefer on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: The rezoning is not required since their is already an abudance of commercially zoned property on Racetrack Rd; most notably adjacent to the the River of Life UM Church at 1600 Racetrack Rd. The original JCP plan did not foresee this property as commercial and I see no reason for it's rezoning other than for the benefit of MasterCraft Builders.

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Randy & Pamela Vincent on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: I support blocking building Office space at the entrance to The Parkes

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Brandon Frick on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Randy & Pamela Vincent on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: I support blocking building Office space at the entrance to The Parkes

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Andrea Smierciak on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: I think this is a horrible use of this space. It will increase traffic and put risks to children and walkers in the area. This is a residential neighborhood and should not be destroyed with more commercial buildings. There are plenty of open commercial areas that have building space for lease to use. Let's reuse space we have instead of making more.

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Gretchen Jolles on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments: I am horrified to learn of this plan. Race Track will become another San Jose Blvd if developers are allowed to continue bldg. I live in the Parkes and do not want to see this happen.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Terri Cooper on Feb 23, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 12 › »