Signatures 1777 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, ... 36 › »
-
301
Name: Keiichi Matsuda on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
302
Name: Thomas on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
303
Name: Daniel Scheinert on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
304
Name: Leah Stewart on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
305
Name: Melissa Franklin on May 11, 2012Comments: There is no confusionFlag
-
306
Name: Anonymous on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
307
Name: Claire Scott on May 11, 2012Comments: I have never drawn any comparison between Jaguar Shoes and Jaguar the car manufacturer. It has never crossed my mind that they could possibly be linked....both when I see the names on paper and when I walk into the premises.Flag
-
308
Name: Stacey Owen on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
309
Name: Diya Babel on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
310
Name: Catherine Whitworth on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
311
Name: Sarah Beeby on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
312
Name: Barry Soraff on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
313
Name: Anna Tjernberg on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
314
Name: Angela Ayepe on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
315
Name: Rory O'Connor on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
316
Name: Chrissie Abbott on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
317
Name: Alex Cleave on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
318
Name: Kate Matheson on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
319
Name: Jody Barton on May 11, 2012Comments: totally ridiculous overstep of rights surrounding a name. the trademark of jaguar is to sell cars not beers !Flag
-
320
Name: Dan Holliday on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
321
Name: Robert Toher on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
322
Name: Mara Bueno on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
323
Name: Colin David Stewart on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
324
Name: Jordan Chatwin on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
325
Name: Nuno Costa on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
326
Name: Anonymous on May 11, 2012Comments: How ridiculousFlag
-
327
Name: MORELLE Marie on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
328
Name: Nils Johnny Ingmar on May 11, 2012Comments: WTF!Flag
-
329
Name: Charlotte Cleave on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
330
Name: Magda Fabianczyk on May 11, 2012Comments: This is an absolutely ridiculous accusation! As well as a car, the jaguar is a also a big cat! Jaguar shoes = leather shoes, which makes sense... not a jaguar car shoes! One must be absolutely withdrawn from reality and also lacking any sense of imagination to pose such idiotic accusations!Flag
-
331
Name: DEAN FREDERICK on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
332
Name: Lindsay Conn on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
333
Name: James Cunningham on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
334
Name: Anonymous on May 11, 2012Comments: I agree with all the above.Flag
-
335
Name: Hampus Gunnarsson on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
336
Name: Clare Wilson on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
337
Name:
Tess Redburn on May 11, 2012
Comments:Flag -
338
Name: Nicholas Bennett on May 11, 2012Comments: keep jaguar shoes alive!Flag
-
339
Name: Eoin Whelan on May 11, 2012Comments: Might as well sue the endangered species themselves and be done with it - REDICULOUSFlag
-
340
Name: Mireille Fauchon on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
341
Name: Stuart Paciej on May 11, 2012Comments: This is a ridiculous affront to coexistence. Jaguar cars and Jaguar shoes are not confused in any sane person's mind. Sincerely hoping the motive is in no way related to the Olympics and East London's consequently higher profile. This will not stand!Flag
-
342
Name: Caroline on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
343
Name: Jean-Gabriel Becker on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
344
Name: Benjamin Hammond on May 11, 2012Comments: this is ludicrousFlag
-
345
Name: Anna Lomax on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
346
Name: Anna Lomax on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
347
Name: SARA LOI on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
348
Name: Sereen El-jamal on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag
-
349
Name: Stephen Smith on May 11, 2012Comments: Frankly, it is inconceivable to suggest there is any confusion between the two businesses. I have never linked Jaguar cars with Jaguar Shoes.Flag
-
350
Name: Jenny Collier on May 11, 2012Comments:Flag