Petition to take back the docks

Signatures 355 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 › »

1. 301
   Name: John Shreves on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 302
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 303
   Name: Mindy L. McBrayer on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 304
   Name: Richard Lennon on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 305
   Name: Smith Anderson on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 306
   Name: Smith Anderson on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 307
   Name: Jennifer Cina on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 308
   Name: Rhonni Malino on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments: Appeasement never works with scoundrels. The defendants have proven themselves to be untrustworthy over and over. If it costs each HOA member a special assessment +/or increased annual dues, so be it. Well worth the money to be a true deep waterfront community.

   Flag
9. 309
   Name: Rhonni Malino on Feb 6, 2013

   Comments: Appeasement never works with scoundrels. The defendants have proven themselves untrustworthy consistently. If the HOA has to pay a special assessment +/or increased annual costs, it is worth it to remain a true deep water community.

   Flag
10. 310
    Name: Shea Chambers on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 311
    Name: R. Bennett Firestone, Jr. on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 312
    Name: Danny Broadwater on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 313
    Name: Danny Broadwater on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments: i will make a donation by Check where do you want it sent

    Flag
14. 314
    Name: Ralph Grant on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 315
    Name: Ken Schwarz on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments: Common area green spaces, amenities, marsh walks and deep water access was a significant factor in our decision to invest and build in I'On.

    Flag
16. 316
    Name: Chisolm Coleman on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 317
    Name: Mollie Coleman on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 318
    Name: George & Mila Vyborny on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 319
    Name: Jacqueline Vermeland on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 320
    Name: David Yarborough on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 321
    Name: Jessica Yarborough on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 322
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 323
    Name: Jefferson Fort on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 324
    Name: Suzanne Fort on Feb 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 325
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 326
    Name: David W Ivey on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: With the dues that we pay the HOA, I would think their stand should be whatever the homeowners stand. I'm not sure why they don't.

    Flag
27. 327
    Name: Amy Mathisen on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 328
    Name: Amy Mathisen on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 329
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 330
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 331
    Name: Steve Degnen on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: I support the petition statement now that the connection to the ownership to the Creek Club has been removed.

    Flag
32. 332
    Name: Anonymous on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 333
    Name: Priscilla Jennings on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: I support, totally, Lea Ann and Brad's efforts on our behalf.

    Flag
34. 334
    Name: Jack Lahti on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments: After attending the recent HOA meeting at the O'Quinn School, I felt that some form of negotiated settlement would be in the best interests of the community. However, after attending the second meeting with the plaintiff's attorneys, I feel that a negotiated settlement would likely resolve matters for only a limited segment of the Assembly. Given the number and range of issues at play, it seems to me that the best way to get a balanced, full airing of these issues, and a resolution acceptable to the greatest number of Assembly members, is to have the suit heard in court. To that end, I would urge the Board to support the ongoing legal process and keep the Assembly apprised of it's deliberations and assessments.

    Flag
35. 335
    Name: Jayne Lahti on Feb 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 336
    Name: Patrick & Jennifer Vail on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 337
    Name: Steven Lenes on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 338
    Name: Elisabeth Lenes on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 339
    Name: Kevin Gary on Feb 8, 2013

    Comments: 87 Latitude Ln

    Flag
40. 340
    Name: Shirley Bishop Runge on Feb 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 341
    Name: Louis T. Dardozzi on Feb 9, 2013

    Comments: I fully support this action!

    Flag
42. 342
    Name: Kenneth And Linda Shortridge on Feb 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 343
    Name: Jason O'Leary on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 344
    Name: Don And Mary Wilbur on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments: We are strongly in favor of preserving the amenities for the homeowners - docks, waterfront park, access to the Creek Club.

    Flag
45. 345
    Name: Tip Jennings on Feb 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 346
    Name: Todd Tyler on Feb 12, 2013

    Comments: When I purchased my home in Olde Park, access to the boat ramp and creek club docks was an amenity of the neighborhood. Olde Park developers gave a piece of land to Grahams in exchange for this.

    Flag
47. 347
    Name: Athan Fokas on Feb 12, 2013

    Comments: Our HOA board will be going into mediation tomorrow Wednesday Feb 13. I hope from all of the signatures received that they understand that the majority of the community would like them to pursue getting our original amenities back and not try to settle in negotiations for another community building elsewhere. Keep what we are supposed to have and then build something in the future with the profits if it is necessary. The Graham's already stated that they would clarify the ambiguities in the verbage for the Creek Club Docks which we were always supposed to have perpetual access to. Don't come out of these negotiations acting like you saved the docks because it is evident that they have already been saved. Reverse the illegal sale and don't settle.

    Flag
48. 348
    Name: Clyde Allen on Feb 13, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 349
    Name: Scott Bidwell on Feb 13, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 350
    Name: Michael Balister on Feb 13, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 › »