Against compulsory intimate examinations of women in Poland

Signatures 409 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 › »

1. 201
   Name: Cristea Cristina on Jun 15, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 202
   Name: Cristea Cristina on Jun 15, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 203
   Name: Boldor Mihaela on Jun 15, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 204
   Name: Melissa on Jun 15, 2011

   Comments: This is aboslutely appalling! Men should be forced to undergo prostate tests in this instance! How disgusting and degrading for Polish women. :-( I hope this bill gets burned in the flames of hell where it belongs.

   Flag
5. 205
   Name: Pamela Myers on Jun 16, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 206
   Name: Lucy Davies on Jun 17, 2011

   Comments: Whilst I agree that women should be encouraged to have a smear test every three years, to force women to undergo such examinations is wrong. perhaps the government's resources would be better spent on improving public health clinics so that women feel more comfortable visiting them. In the UK, there is no compunction, women have a variety of options open to them and uptake of smear tests is high. Education and widening access to decent services is the way forward to improving women's health

   Flag
7. 207
   Name: Katie Ausenbaugh on Jun 18, 2011

   Comments: I am 100% behind you ladies, I am sorry your government is blind to the respect of woman.

   Flag
8. 208
   Name: Anonymous on Jun 19, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 209
   Name: Amy Graver on Jun 19, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 210
    Name: Raheem Vegan-winter on Jun 19, 2011

    Comments: My body my choice! Outrageous!

    Flag
11. 211
    Name: Tharana Patten on Jun 19, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 212
    Name: Laura Curtin on Jun 20, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 213
    Name: Veronica Avellino on Jun 20, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 214
    Name: Leon: Edwards on Jun 20, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 215
    Name: Grania Hansford on Jun 21, 2011

    Comments: This is absolutely disgusting. A complete breach of human rights and an assault on women.

    Flag
16. 216
    Name: Emma Regan on Jun 21, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 217
    Name: Natalia Holloway on Jun 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 218
    Name: Victoria Clarke on Jun 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 219
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 22, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 220
    Name: KL on Jun 23, 2011

    Comments: This is against human rights! How can you force anyone to undergo any examination? Especially so intimate examination? Unfortuantely Ewa Kopacz (Polish Ministry of Health) has such "brilliant" ideas. Here you can read about her restrictions for giving anesthesia/pain-killer during childbirth: http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2008/11/14/poland-facing-declining-birth-rates-says-health-plan-wont-cover-anesthetic-during-childbirth.

    Flag
21. 221
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 23, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 222
    Name: Kasia on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments: W tym kraju nie można sprawdzić dzieciom paznokci czy mają czyste ani włosów pod kątem wszy,bo to by było naruszenie ich godności osobistej i jest zakazane prawem i podniosło by się zaraz wielkie larum. Natomiast badanie pochwy kobiecie bez jej zgody i co nie ma nic wspólnego z pracą ,bo taka kobieta nie pracuje jako prostytutka ,miało by być wg pani Kopacz w porządku... Obłuda ,obłuda i jeszcze raz obłuda. I łamanie praw człowieka.

    Flag
23. 223
    Name: Kasia on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments: W tym kraju nie można sprawdzić dzieciom paznokci czy mają czyste ani włosów pod kątem wszy,bo to by było naruszenie ich godności osobistej i jest zakazane prawem i podniosło by się zaraz wielkie larum. Natomiast badanie pochwy kobiecie bez jej zgody i co nie ma nic wspólnego z pracą ,bo taka kobieta nie pracuje jako prostytutka ,miało by być wg pani Kopacz w porządku... Obłuda ,obłuda i jeszcze raz obłuda. I łamanie praw człowieka.

    Flag
24. 224
    Name: Urszula on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments: Prawda jest taka,że gdyby kobiety były traktowane przez lekarzy ginekologów nie jak przedmiot, ale delikatnie i po ludzku ,to nie miały by obiekcji przed tymi badaniami.Ale u nas dba się tylko o napełnienie kobzy konowałom,a nie o zmianę warunków przyjmowania w przychodniach. W każdym bądź razie ta ustawa będzie naruszeniem praw człowieka i polskiej konstytucji.

    Flag
25. 225
    Name: Mary Ensell on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 226
    Name: R Singh on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 227
    Name: Gemma on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 228
    Name: J K Ensell on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 229
    Name: Rhiannon on Jun 24, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 230
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 25, 2011

    Comments: good luck to you in your fight for equality and respect.

    Flag
31. 231
    Name: Beata on Jun 25, 2011

    Comments: Jestem przeciw ,bo to narusza moje niezbywalne prawo człowieka do samodecydowania o sobie. Ja nie pracuję vaginą.Niedługo pani Kopacz wymyśli , żeby zapobiec upadkowi systemu emerytalnego ,że każda kobieta która nie chce mieć dzieci ma być zwalniana z pracy.Więc aby tego uniknąć będzie musiała przymusowo uprawiać sex i dać się zapłodnić .Albo przynieść lekarzowi medycyny pracy kwitek o bezpłodności.

    Flag
32. 232
    Name: Katherine Stewart on Jun 25, 2011

    Comments: Eww, I am against this. Sometimes an intimate examination is OK, othertimes it is bearable and at other times it is traumatic. No one should be forced, coerced nor blackmailed to have such an examination. I suggest that those people who are forcing through this bill should ask themselves whether they would like to have someone prod around in their private areas, or face the sack? I don't suppose many men would fancy having a stick forced up their penis, or else lose their jobs, now, would they? I think they would be angry and frightened.

    Flag
33. 233
    Name: Sue Taylor on Jun 26, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 234
    Name: Anonymous on Jun 29, 2011

    Comments: Unacceptable institutionalised abuse that's surely against human rights legislation!

    Flag
35. 235
    Name: Joanna Lorent on Jun 29, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 236
    Name: Michelle R. Zmarzly on Jul 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 237
    Name: Ciara on Jul 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 238
    Name: Maureen Rhys on Jul 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 239
    Name: Nicola Shelock on Jul 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 240
    Name: Jennifer Mizzoni on Jul 2, 2011

    Comments: I want to see the women of Poland given the right of choice regarding their bodies! It is abhorrant that this could be inacted! America stand up for our global sisters!!!

    Flag
41. 241
    Name: Saoirse Cullen on Jul 2, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 242
    Name: Joanna on Jul 4, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 243
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 4, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 244
    Name: Angela Leyland on Jul 4, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
45. 245
    Name: Aldona Adamska on Jul 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 246
    Name: Agnieszka Wegrzyn on Jul 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 247
    Name: Kataryna Klimczewska on Jul 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 248
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 249
    Name: Joanna Dobkowska on Jul 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 250
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 5, 2011

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 › »