Say No to Stafford Western Access Road

Signatures 61 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 1
   Name: Anthony Shanley on Dec 5, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: John Gale on Dec 6, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Susan Wills on Dec 6, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 6, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Damon Hoppe on Dec 6, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: David Hickman on Dec 7, 2009

   Comments: I agree with all the comments posted (except for the bus station which I consider to be an old fashioned outmoded concept) this road is surely one of the lowest priorities in Stafford.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Kathy Nicholls on Dec 7, 2009

   Comments: I have already posted my comments on the SC planning survey. More public transport If they are going to by pass do it properly- through the golf course! Less developement Tescos trafffic not my problem- town palnners!

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Jeremy Milln on Dec 7, 2009

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 8, 2009

   Comments: Another ill thought out con job by by the council.... feathering their own nests with no regard for what the people of Stafford want.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Michael Ranson on Dec 8, 2009

    Comments: Congestion problem would not exist if: 1) Chell Road were turned into the main carpark and the Chell Road route went through the existing carpark around the back of Sainsburys (eliminating the 3 sets pedestrian lights that are the main problem) 2) All lights around roundabouts were part time and only used when heavy congestion existed. 3) Zebra Crossings with central islands replace all Pelican Crossings. 4) Roundabouts replace the lights at Tescos and West Way on the Newport Road.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: R.O.Foulkes on Dec 8, 2009

    Comments: I am opposed to the proposal on the grounds that 1) a bypass on the western side of Stafford is unnecessary and will serve simply to increase traffic congestion on roads serving the.town centre. 2)It will result in development of the Greenfield area known locally as Castlefields, thus robbing Stafford people of the only accessible recreational land within walking distance of a significant section of the population (aprox 15,000) on the west side of Stafford.

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: R.O.Foulkes on Dec 8, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Lauren Farrell on Dec 8, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Mike Shone on Dec 8, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 9, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Roger Oldfield on Dec 9, 2009

    Comments: The Copenhagen summit is currently trying to save the planet by drastic cuts in carbon emissions. Staffordshire County Council is committed to similar action by the Staffordshire Declaration on Climate Change. Further road-building is a non-starter in these circumstances.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Roger Oldfield on Dec 9, 2009

    Comments: The Copenhagen summit is currently trying to save the planet by drastic cuts in carbon emissions. Staffordshire County Council is committed to similar action by the Staffordshire Declaration on Climate Change. Further road-building is a non-starter in these circumstances.

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Jill Lock on Dec 9, 2009

    Comments: This road is unnecessary, unaffordable, and would damage the delicate environment of Stafford marshes.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Mel Ellis on Dec 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Pamela Cain on Dec 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Ricky Millar on Dec 10, 2009

    Comments: Over saturation of traffic lights and no thought given to Superstores, Pedestrian areas and Retail Parks means the Councils should take responsibility for the problem.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Sam Mace on Dec 10, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Suzanne Kendal-Morgan on Dec 11, 2009

    Comments: I am against the proposed Western Bypass, believing very strongly that increasing roads will not reduce the traffic or solve the problem of future congestion. A better, more affordable bus serviced with bus stations which are in town would enable people to make more sustainable choices for the town.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Ben Popple on Dec 13, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Tom Harris on Dec 18, 2009

    Comments: Please support STAR in opposing these plans.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: J.S.Greenhalgh on Dec 23, 2009

    Comments: We desparately need less private and more public transport. The proposed access road will leed to an increase in transport and more CO2. It will reverse the gains made by Stafford's renewables scheme.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: J.S.Greenhalgh on Dec 23, 2009

    Comments: We desparately need less private and more public transport. The proposed access road will leed to an increase in transport and more CO2. It will reverse the gains made by Stafford's renewables scheme.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Jennie McGeoch on Dec 29, 2009

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Kathryn Greenhalgh on Jan 7, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: William Hook on Jan 9, 2010

    Comments: Doxey Marsh is a lovely place to walk and ride a bike through, and it would be a great pity to lose this wonderful resource. Not to mention the increase in traffic to the town centre, which is busy enough as it is!

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: EDWARD CHAMBERS on Jan 9, 2010

    Comments: A more urgent improvement would be the bypass that has been proposed over the last 30 years or so on the east side of Stafford. If it was extended to Junction 13 of the M6 this would also help when there are problems on the motorway

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Catherine Stokes on Jan 10, 2010

    Comments: Its the A34 Lichfield Road and A449 Wolverhampton Road that need sorting ou tas regards to traffic problems. The Doxey Marshes has had enough land taken off it when the Henry Boot estate was built up the Eccleshall Road, and the disruption to people living in castletown would be horrendous. 100% against the Western bypass.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Helen Wilson on Jan 10, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Sea N Harris on Jan 10, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Caroline Smith on Jan 10, 2010

    Comments: A new road does not address the issues. More homes means more cars. Why are we not looking at improving public transport to encourage less traffic to help the environment and not destroy what is left of it!

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Caroline Smith on Jan 10, 2010

    Comments: A new road does not address the issues. More homes means more cars. Why are we not looking at improving public transport to encourage less traffic to help the environment and not destroy what is left of it!

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Yvonne Scott Frasor on Jan 11, 2010

    Comments: Time polticians remembered they are our servants NOT our masters!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: John Kelsall on Jan 12, 2010

    Comments: The public are not going to benefit from this development. All it will do is produce more congestion i.e. at least 2 cars per house built. Which developers are going to benefit and what is their relationship with the Council officals making the decision allowing this development to go ahead.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Christine Kelsall on Jan 12, 2010

    Comments: Stafford already has a by-passs, it is called the M6. What is really needed is a workable Park and Ride system. Have any of our councillors visited such towns as Chester or Shrewsbury to see how it is done? Or is this a case of "you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours" !!! But more important than all our words is Doxey Marshes and the Wildlife.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Gareth Hancox on Jan 12, 2010

    Comments: This needs to be stopped immediately. Waste of time and money, and DOES NOT solve any of the town's transport problems, just moves it elsewhere in the town

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: K WILLIAMS on Jan 12, 2010

    Comments: NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, PLEASE LETS VOTE FOR ANOTHER COUNCIL PLANNING DEPT WHO CAN DO THE JOB CORRECTLEY FOR THE PEOPLE OF STAFFORD WITHOUT ANY MORE WASTEING OF COVERNMENT OR COUNCIL FUNDS

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: William Smith on Jan 13, 2010

    Comments: I think its time that both we and the council understood that the council works for us; if we do not want a plan of theirs implemented then it shouldn't be implemented. In a normal work situation where an employee does not do as he is asked, he is generally sacked; so how do we go about sacking the council?

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Mike Knowles on Jan 13, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Michael Hill on Jan 14, 2010

    Comments: i've read comments, i've read about the considered plans, i've seen this sort of plan go ahead in other boroughs and fail miserably, i have seen this scale of money wasted ten fold on these exact projects before with no great outcome, so all in all my opinion is to ditch the whole idea!

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: John-Francis Hook on Jan 15, 2010

    Comments: Sort out Lichfield Rd WAY before anything else

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Philip Mcvay on Jan 18, 2010

    Comments: I feel that the planned bypass is a complete waste of my tax, it will in no way eliviate the ease of journey to Stafford from the south end of the town, especially as there are new housing estates in the planning for the Police head Quarters. I object to the proposal on every level!!!

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Geoffrey Oliver on Jan 19, 2010

    Comments: I am very much in favour of any proposal that tackles Staffords growing traffic congestion.All the main entry roads into town are lined with Victorian houses and were therefore designed for the horse n cart so just as you are reading this in modern format not penny post, lets move on and get a modern road system.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Allan Weaver on Jan 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Theresa Robbins on Jan 20, 2010

    Comments: My partner, myself and my one year old moved here just before Christmas and were unaware of any plans that would effect our lives, despite having paid for extra searches for local potential builds. We felt that Doxey Road, despite leading to an industrial area and being close to town would be acceptable for our first home as the road is not as busy as all other roads leading to town therefore air and noise polution being much better and safer than those. We feel horrified about the proposals for development on our door step which if go ahead would have a direct negative impact on our daughter's health and baby's health and we are disturbed by the information we've been provided with since about the actual reasons for this road, none of which benefit our us and our health, most other local residents, Stafford's infastructure, the climate, the marshes, tax paxers pcokets etc. I will not be paying taxes to line the pockets of developers who in turn will make my new home a living hell. Castle town has the potential to be a beautiful part of Staffod but not if the doxey road and surrounding areas are subjected to yet more concrete, more noise and more conjestion. These plans will spoil yet another part of Staffod.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Dave Fradley on Jan 20, 2010

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2