Signatures 1431 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 26, 27, 28, 29
-
1401
Name: Carrie Lyons on Feb 23, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1402
Name: Anonymous on Feb 24, 2010Comments: We suffered for over two years and didn't receive much help. Everything was out of pocket and took a toll on our marriage and financial health. This is something that should be covered under insurance.Flag
-
1403
Name: Anonymous on Mar 2, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1404
Name: Paul Stilwell on Mar 3, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1405
Name: Susan K. Smitley on Mar 4, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1406
Name: Kelly Doris on Mar 11, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1407
Name: Joyce Zigler on Mar 13, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1408
Name: Beau Zigler on Mar 13, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1409
Name: Jim Hemmelgarn on Mar 14, 2010Comments: I support the legislation that would require insurance companies to cover infertility treatments. Take it out of the outrageous and immoral payments made to the CEO's and other executives in the insurance companies. Health insurance is to take care of more than the fat cats at the top of the company!Flag
-
1410
Name: Anonymous on Mar 15, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1411
Name: Kellee Morgan on Mar 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1412
Name: Michele Lunders on Mar 24, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1413
Name: Gail Courtney on Mar 27, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1414
Name: Tiffany on Apr 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1415
Name: Lindsay Mondick on Apr 4, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1416
Name: Pam Irick on Apr 5, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1417
Name: Jillian Adams on Apr 6, 2010Comments: There are so many programs out there to help Mothers support their unwanted children, we need a program to help infertal women who want to have a baby of their own actually be able to get one. There is so much money going out to enable fertal women who do not want or keep their children. There should be equally enough money to help wanted children to be born to infertal women.Flag
-
1418
Name: Emily on Apr 27, 2010Comments: Insurance covering infertility and surrogacy would be a great help! Don't make us suffer. We are going to be great parents some day unlike some of those unfit parents out there who don't give a crap about their children.Flag
-
1419
Name: Meggon Mae Thornburgh on May 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1420
Name: Kristen Lynn on Jun 8, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1421
Name: Tonya Roberson on Jun 25, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1422
Name: Jemma on Jul 1, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1423
Name: Deborah Patrick on Jul 6, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1424
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2010Comments: Please support this. My insurance plan supposedly covers a mere $15,000 lifetime max for Infertility. However, when I contacted them about it, I was told I was not covered because I could not prove I was Infertile yet - because I had not tried 6 cycles of IUI. I decided to proceed with testing to see where I stood (I am 40yo), and found that my FSH level was 30 - which is very high and indicative of infertility. When my RE appealed the decision and now "proved" that I did in fact have an infertility issue, it was denied because I was now TOO infertile and they do not cover someone whose FSH is over 19. Absurd. First I couldn't prove an issue, and when I proved it, they said now it was too much of an issue. For a lousy $15,000 benefit - less than a single cycle of IVF.Flag
-
1425
Name: Amy Brooker on Aug 16, 2010Comments: With the number of infertile couples increasing instead of decreasing we really need someone to make a stand! Please stop the insurance companies from denying infertile couples the joy that so many take for granted. In addition, we need someone to stand up and tell these companies that they need to cover pregnancy of the surrogates that help couples have the children they long for! When are the people going to start being protected? When are law makers going to start making the greedy corporations give back some of what they take?!Flag
-
1426
Name: Kay Howell on Aug 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1427
Name: Claire on Aug 21, 2010Comments: babies for all mums to beFlag
-
1428
Name: Anonymous on Feb 23, 2011Comments:Flag
-
1429
Name: Jennifer McIntyre on Mar 28, 2011Comments: I am a military spouse and am suffering secondary infertility because of a c-section by military docs and insurance does not cover the procedures neccessary to have a seond child. Why am I forced to explain to my almost 4 year old why her friends have siblings, but we can't afford to.Flag
-
1430
Name: Anonymous on Jun 20, 2011Comments: To cover birth control, impotency medications etc. but not infertility is ridiculous. I was told that removing a cyst on my fallopian tube wouldn't be covered by insurance because all the tube is used for is fertility. Can you imagine? Like I should wait until it grows and grows until it reaches something "important". Fortunately, I won my appeal. However, this pervasive attitude about reproductive assistance being optional considering everything else that is covered is insulting.Flag
-
1431
Name:
Salina Marie on Nov 24, 2011
Comments:Flag