Chris Benoit is regarded as one of the best and hardest working wrestlers of all time. Had he not committed the heinous act in which resulted in the deaths of his family and himself he would either be A: still wrestling or B: already inducted. Why should the merits of being inducted be predicated upon what he did on the outside of the business as opposed to what the Hall Of Fame is supposed to represent which is recognition for the impact one has on the business directly? This should to apply to all forms of Hall of Fames. And personal grudges between a business owner and former employee should have no bearing on grounds for Induction. Otherwise where is the credability to your Hall Of Fame? And whats supposed to make it special other than having the Best of the Best in there?