Oppose the 40th IFRA Amendment

Signatures 1125 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 › »

1. 1051
   Name: Pait on Aug 16, 2011

   Comments: Phenomenal breakdown of the topic, you sholud write for me too!

   Flag
2. 1052
   Name: Pait on Aug 16, 2011

   Comments: Phenomenal breakdown of the topic, you sholud write for me too!

   Flag
3. 1053
   Name: Carlee on Aug 17, 2011

   Comments: Very valid, pithy, suicccnt, and on point. WD.

   Flag
4. 1054
   Name: Carlee on Aug 17, 2011

   Comments: Very valid, pithy, suicccnt, and on point. WD.

   Flag
5. 1055
   Name: Alex on Aug 17, 2011

   Comments: Finllay! This is just what I was looking for.

   Flag
6. 1056
   Name: Hessy on Sep 23, 2011

   Comments: Shoot, so that's that one supopses.

   Flag
7. 1057
   Name: Emmy on Sep 25, 2011

   Comments: Way to go on this essay, hpeled a ton.

   Flag
8. 1058
   Name: Carlos Q. on Nov 14, 2011

   Comments: I will not buy ANY perfumes which have been tainted by these STUPID IFRA bureaucratic "rules". I will tell everyone about these new changes and we will let the companies do the talking on our behalf. We will not buy IFRA. Who are they to tell me i cant buy my perfume they way I please. They are not God. Let the money do the talking everyone. I will tell everyone about these new FORCED changes on our perfumes and the companies and bureaucrats will pay deeply.

   Flag
9. 1059
   Name: Anonymous on Dec 14, 2011

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 1060
    Name: Brian Shea on Feb 5, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 1061
    Name: Kmcyqxtwq on May 21, 2012

    Comments: WEz3LM lxwbayhupaes, nhcuqfazxkqq, oudyphmrfafj, http://tqloudsnfigl.com/

    Flag
12. 1062
    Name: Janja on Jun 16, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 1063
    Name: Rfrmmpp on Jul 23, 2012

    Comments: o7l0om etmwqxyoykan, bsbxphyhgpkz, epbmusouajhs, http://dorurktyomvb.com/

    Flag
14. 1064
    Name: Louise Worrell on Aug 14, 2012

    Comments: I

    Flag
15. 1065
    Name: Rdpsqfzamib on Oct 15, 2012

    Comments: gMkyMn whsyksdlrdyt, wldcjopmuqtp, uqycrlmeoggh, http://vwcobcycgbjh.com/

    Flag
16. 1066
    Name: Star Khechara on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: as a natural skincare formulator and lecturer in essential oil sciences, I am disgusted that these safe substances are being restricted due to shoddy science and IFRA

    Flag
17. 1067
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 1068
    Name: Ksenia Gertseva on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 1069
    Name: Salena Walker on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 1070
    Name: Marsha Durok on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 1071
    Name: Julia Idris on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 1072
    Name: Sue Halfyard on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 1073
    Name: Amanda Johnson on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 1074
    Name: Andrew Phillips on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 1075
    Name: Andrew Phillips on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 1076
    Name: Geeta Sood on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments: cosmetic safety standards are already stringent enough especiall in the EU, do not make it even hard for us trying to earn a honest living.

    Flag
27. 1077
    Name: Anne on Dec 7, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 1078
    Name: Angela Campbell on Dec 9, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 1079
    Name: Gail Davidson on Dec 10, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 1080
    Name: Ianus Maria on Dec 17, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 1081
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments: Surely warning labels could prevent the need for banning certain ingredients? No one would dream of banning peanuts, so why ban oakmoss?

    Flag
32. 1082
    Name: Astrid Steinhilber on Dec 18, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 1083
    Name: Lara Zembekis on Dec 19, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 1084
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 20, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 1085
    Name: Alex H on Dec 30, 2012

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 1086
    Name: Marsha Durok on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 1087
    Name: Rose Schneider on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Humans are organic in nature and need organic compounds for health and beauty products - NOT chemicals that our bodies do not know how to process. Keep natural / organic products available to all who choose to use.

    Flag
38. 1088
    Name: Helen Reeves-Howard on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 1089
    Name: Shahleena on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 1090
    Name: Meriel Cant on Jan 21, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 1091
    Name: Teresa Lewis on Jan 25, 2013

    Comments: The whole point of legislation like this is to cripple small businesses while the large companies have the economies of scale to afford the certification and licenses. The mega corporations can bribe governments to allow toxic and dangerous chemicals.

    Flag
42. 1092
    Name: Elizabeth New on Jan 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 1093
    Name: Elizabeth New on Jan 27, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 1094
    Name: Isabel Martin Osete on Feb 1, 2013

    Comments: I strongly oppose Brussels regulators who create havoc unnecessarily and mostly order allergy tests on allergic patients in the Perfumery domain, to seek the professional Perfumers advice and to look back on several thousands years of Perfumery evolution. For a very long time, Perfumery was used as a health remedy and prevention against epidemic contamination. Then, suddenly in the past years and for no valid reason, Brussels' bureaucrats have decided to interfere with this beautiful industry they do not understand and kill the fine perfumes of the past. Should they not rather concentrate on regulating agriculture, the pesticides and fertilizers used that make so many thousand people sick and are surely damaging our planet ???? Enough intervention please, leave us to create as we used to, nobody is dying from a simple allergy to a Perfume. My own mother is allergic to some of them which will only give her a slight head-ache. She knows it and avoids using those. It's as simple as that.

    Flag
45. 1095
    Name: Lorenzo Santana Cruz on Feb 2, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 1096
    Name: James Barnett on Feb 16, 2013

    Comments: Rather than destroy the achievements of perfume artistry with over-regulation of ingredients, as with other allergens such as peanut butter, simply list the possible allergens and the unfortunate can avoid them.

    Flag
47. 1097
    Name: Kurt Van Der Muller on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 1098
    Name: Annelie Högild on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 1099
    Name: Carina Paananen on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: I am not so good in english, but please think a bit of us who adore perfumes..

    Flag
50. 1100
    Name: Lauren on Feb 22, 2013

    Comments: In light of the grave financial issues currently faced by the world markets, wouldn't it behoove the Union to create legislation that facilitated commerce and protected business interests? With all due respect, the legislation that is the subject of this petition has a chilling effect on the entire perfume industry. At the minimum, a hearing in which members of the industry are able to express their concerns and discuss the impact of these restrictions is certainly in order prior to the imposition of further restrictive legislation. The current regulations, which have curtailed the production of a number of natural botanicals and thus crippled a segment of the agricultural/horticultural industry of France and other Union members, should also be reviewed with an eye toward possible repeal. It is respectfully submitted that the end sought by restrictions on potentially allergenic ingredients could be accomplished just as effectively and with far less harm to financial livelihood of the perfume industry by requiring the use of warning labels, a device used by the American tobacco industry in conjunction with a far more dangerous product.

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 › »