Signatures 1137 total
Page: « ‹ 1, ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 › »
-
1001
Name: Anonymous on Aug 26, 2008Comments:Flag
-
1002
Name: Anonymous on Sep 12, 2008Comments:Flag
-
1003
Name: Anonymous on Jan 30, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1004
Name: Anonymous on Mar 21, 2009Comments: As long as said ingredients aren`t ingested, or knowingly used on an allergy-prone against their will,etc., no need to ban!!Flag
-
1005
Name: Ruth Pendzich on Apr 4, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1006
Name: Gwendolyne Holman on Apr 9, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1007
Name: Lynelle White on Apr 18, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1008
Name: Barbara on Apr 29, 2009Comments: I ask that this body repeal this legislation-I prefer organics, and whisht to choose what I wear and smell. I do NOT want synthetics in my fragrance or goods.I see my beloved fragrances disappearing where there is no shortage and no reall concern. Those who cannot wear fragrance or smell them can go without, if they like. Synthetics save money, but are more offensive to my skin and well being than this proposition.Synthetics make me itch and are offensive to smell.Why pay for a favorite perfume, when it now smells of flat, thin chemicals that masqueradeI ask that organics be left alone, and than artisans, with care and mindful of our concerns, be allowed to continue the craft that supports the majority of our preference.Flag
-
1009
Name: Anonymous on May 3, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1010
Name: Anonymous on May 12, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1011
Name: Anonymous on Jun 28, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1012
Name: Terhi Haukka on Jul 21, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1013
Name: Anna LoCurzio on Sep 12, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1014
Name: Michael on Sep 30, 2009Comments: I cant believe they wouldnt just conisder putting a WARNING label on boxes regarding photosensitivity like other cosmetic products-someone is making money from this SCANDAL and INSULT to consumers of FINE fragrance. I cant believe we still sell cancer in a stick but want to limit what we can spray on our skin ABSURD!Flag
-
1015
Name: Martina Schmidt on Oct 19, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1016
Name: Davina Hide on Oct 29, 2009Comments: Keep Brussels out of our English LawsFlag
-
1017
Name: Davina Hide on Oct 29, 2009Comments: Keep Brussels out of our English LawsFlag
-
1018
Name: Anonymous on Nov 1, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1019
Name: Christine Fairchild on Nov 17, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1020
Name: Anonymous on Dec 15, 2009Comments: Treat tree moss et al as the food industry treats nuts. At least traces of tree moss in parfume always have a purpose.Flag
-
1021
Name: Anonymous on Dec 16, 2009Comments:Flag
-
1022
Name: Jane on Jan 8, 2010Comments: Ifra Amendments are an appalling development & one that destroys an entire history and legacy of Art and creativity for natural perfumers.Flag
-
1023
Name: Christina Sartore on Jan 19, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1024
Name: Lkmxtrhfqsq on Jan 20, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1025
Name: MKnCBF on Feb 15, 2010Comments: nVufjtgvFlag
-
1026
Name: NyckiV on Mar 5, 2010Comments: kLtDeKCaFlag
-
1027
Name: Gnkomptm on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1028
Name: Lxomrhkhma on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1029
Name: Pdvcrghkicc on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1030
Name: Efuasz on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1031
Name: Gukjwjjlojv on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1032
Name: Ynlvbspdw on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1033
Name: Bweoatslmcs on Mar 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1034
Name: Swaptlkrvqt on Mar 22, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1035
Name: Beymsbhwhcc on Mar 22, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1036
Name: Cyrdezfscyd on Mar 22, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1037
Name: Jvwlvvfgxp on Mar 22, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1038
Name: Tpkbvwrqztf on Mar 22, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1039
Name: Rqvksihh on Mar 28, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1040
Name: Tracy Heller on Jun 18, 2010Comments: As a long time chypre lover, I cherish my fragrances that have oakmoss in them. Why can't warnings be put on fragrance labels instead of banning essential ingredients and forcing reformulations of classic fragrances that to me, are art and part of history. Many people are allergic to strawberries and chocolate - should we ban those as well? Its the same difference to me - chypres are my pleasure (along with strawberries and chocolate!)Flag
-
1041
Name: Amy Nordahl Cote on Jun 19, 2010Comments: This amendment has destroyed many great perfumes--works of art, just as great music or great paintings are. Put a warning label on the box and let the consumer decide! I am writing as both a perfume-lover and allergy-sufferer.Flag
-
1042
Name: Anonymous on Aug 16, 2010Comments:Flag
-
1043
Name: Jen Meade on Nov 15, 2010Comments: Warning labels should suffice... These regulations are limiting and destroying an art form.Flag
-
1044
Name: Tricia Postle on Nov 18, 2010Comments: When bergamot is outlawed, only outlaws will wear bergamot! ;-)Flag
-
1045
Name: Mark Sage on Mar 18, 2011Comments:Flag
-
1046
Name: Barbie on Jul 2, 2011Comments: Thats more than senbsile! Thats a great post!Flag
-
1047
Name: Bettie on Jul 3, 2011Comments: Stands back from the kyebroad in amazement! Thanks!Flag
-
1048
Name: Janese on Jul 3, 2011Comments: I thank you hmubly for sharing your wisdom JJWYFlag
-
1049
Name: Trish on Jul 3, 2011Comments: Thanks for sharnig. Always good to find a real expert.Flag
-
1050
Name: Jetson on Aug 16, 2011Comments: Yeah that's what I'm talikng about baby--nice work!Flag