Oppose the 40th IFRA Amendment

Signatures 1126 total

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, ... 23 › »

1. 751
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 25, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 752
   Name: Laraine Kyle on Feb 25, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
3. 753
   Name: MARTA FERN on Feb 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 754
   Name: AMG on Feb 26, 2007

   Comments: Let's concentrate our time on saving lives, pls. I oppose the IFRA Amendment to it's CoP

   Flag
5. 755
   Name: Aleksandra Krotowska-Cacha on Feb 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 756
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 757
   Name: Anonymous on Feb 26, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 758
   Name: Bill Gluyas on Feb 26, 2007

   Comments: I wish to strongly oppose the 40th IFRA Amendment, and register my full support for the continuing availability of natural aromatics and essential oils both to the public and for use in natural product formulation.

   Flag
9. 759
   Name: Christina Milstein on Feb 27, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 760
    Name: Dario Fernandez on Feb 27, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 761
    Name: Collin Patrick on Feb 28, 2007

    Comments: Les restrictions arbitraires ne posent pas les bonnes questions s'appuient parfois sur une m

    Flag
12. 762
    Name: Collin Patrick on Feb 28, 2007

    Comments: Les restrictions arbitraires ne posent pas les bonnes questions s'appuient parfois sur une m

    Flag
13. 763
    Name: Jo Graham on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 764
    Name: David Mark on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 765
    Name: Tracy Tappin on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments: People react more to synthetic perfumes and ingredients that ever will to essential oils ! Another attempt to steal our rights and our health for someone elses financial gain!

    Flag
16. 766
    Name: Isabelle Gelle on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments: Risk zero does not exist and the more you'll try to work towards it, the more Mother Nature will take revenge. Just see the MRSA and antibiotics!! So rather than banning the natural, why not look deeper into what synthetics do to a healthy body. You want to put us in a bubble but you will not succeed...

    Flag
17. 767
    Name: Dawn Johnson on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 768
    Name: Laura M. on Mar 1, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
19. 769
    Name: John Brebner on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments: Controls are good, but absolute control is dangerous. More openess and transparency, with open discussions before arbitrary decisions are taken.

    Flag
20. 770
    Name: Bev Badger on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 771
    Name: Sherry Henderson-Carley on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments: Please perserve our right to use EO in products and perfumes.

    Flag
22. 772
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 773
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 774
    Name: Piia M on Mar 2, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 775
    Name: Leanne Chevallier on Mar 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 776
    Name: Chalyce Macoskey on Mar 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 777
    Name: Melanie Brown on Mar 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 778
    Name: Alison Thompson Butler on Mar 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 779
    Name: Patricia West on Mar 4, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 780
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 781
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 5, 2007

    Comments: Si vous me demandez mon avis, je vous dirai que la vie est une affaire bien dangereuse: nous risquons d'en mourir a tout instant ! Elle est aussi un paradoxe puisque c'est en se consumant qu'elle s'exprime et qu'elle fonde du sens. Qui suis-je pour imposer a quiconque un style de vie plus qu'un autre Je mange, bois, prie et me parfume parce que cela fait sans doute partie d'un ensemble de valeurs personelles et sociales qui sont importantes a mon equilibre. Que M. le Legislateur ne s'arroge pas le droit de me reequilibrer a mon insu. Je suis un etre a part entiere, comme l'etait mon ancetre il y a 5000 ou 100000 ans. Je souhaite, comme lui, pouvoir eplucher mon orange sans que la "Police Speciale du d-Limonene" ne m'empeche de le faire pour des raisons de securite que je ne partage pas. Je ne souhaite pas vivre une vie par procuration bruxelloise. Mon pere et ma mere se sont occupes de mon education. Je dispense M. le Legislateur de se soucier de mon bien-etre. Qu'il se contente de me fournir les elements necessaires a ma reflexion... plutot que de me l'interdire. Je lui en sais d'avance gre. A bon entendeur, salut!

    Flag
32. 782
    Name: Alexandra Balahoutis on Mar 6, 2007

    Comments: This effects not only those who favor natural ingredients over synthetic ones but any of those who use essential oils, whether alone or in the presence of synthetics. I, a purist and member of the natural products community, am troubled by such silliness and I imagine that all sorts of enormous companies producing any number of even partially natural products would be equally threatened. My company is a small one producing strictly botanical perfumes but I imagine I would be effected equally if my company were Guerlain or Coca Cola.

    Flag
33. 783
    Name: Suzanne Catty on Mar 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 784
    Name: Kathleen Costain on Mar 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 785
    Name: Diana Rajchel on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: Nice try at bullying guys. Make a better product that consumers like, or step down. Quit going after natural, safe materials. You neither rule nor own the world, so get over it.

    Flag
36. 786
    Name: Christiane White on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: I am allergic to almost all synthetic scents. This amendment will render it very difficult for me in many different ways. I oppose it completely.

    Flag
37. 787
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 788
    Name: Dori Mondon on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 789
    Name: Stacey Gruver on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 790
    Name: Meredith Dillman on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: This is unessessary red tape for entreprenuers and small businesses.

    Flag
41. 791
    Name: Mary B. Welsch on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 792
    Name: Redrevvy on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 793
    Name: Beth H-B on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: There's no substitute for mother nature.

    Flag
44. 794
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: I think this is a bad move, healthy and natural products should never be exchanged for more less effective sythentics. Please don't let big business profits, take away a good thing for all.

    Flag
45. 795
    Name: Rebecca Wrynn on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: A pathetic attempt to kill the small companies like ours. Ridiculous.

    Flag
46. 796
    Name: Rebecca Wrynn on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: Don't turn a blind eye to companies like mine. This is a pathetic attempt to kill small business.

    Flag
47. 797
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 798
    Name: Elizabeth Yockel on Mar 8, 2007

    Comments: The idea that these essential oils would be banned is ridiculous. Natural substances are far healthier for people (and animals and the earth) than synthetics are.

    Flag
49. 799
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 800
    Name: Gina Marie Baker on Mar 9, 2007

    Comments: This is hog wash!

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, ... 23 › »