| # | Name | Comments |
|---|
| 1 | Steve Scott (Scotty) | |
| 2 | Martin Pilkington | |
| 3 | Saul Mora | |
| 4 | Michael Rentas | Pretty please? |
| 5 | Michael Furtak | |
| 6 | Anonymous | |
| 7 | Anonymous | |
| 8 | Emanuele Vulcano | It is in Apple's best interest to let us talk among each other -- sharing code leads very often, if not always, to better code quality and therefore a better environment for everyone. |
| 9 | Mark Grimes | |
| 10 | Jason Kurczak | |
| 11 | Bill Dudney | please |
| 12 | Jack Holt | |
| 13 | Scott Little | Yes. please remove the NDA. It made lots of sense before the release of the OS 2.0 but now we want to discuss things to learn how to make better applications! |
| 14 | Greg Mueller | |
| 15 | Simon Wolf | |
| 16 | Gareth Fleming | |
| 17 | Uli Kusterer | |
| 18 | William Dahlberg | |
| 19 | Brent Rowland | It's nearly-impossible to develop great software these days without the ability to tap the community for help. |
| 20 | Devon | What's the hold up Apple? App Store and 2.0 are officially out so why are you hampering development by keeping us under NDA? What purpose could you possibly have? |
| 21 | Mike | |
| 22 | Mark Hughes | The F---ING NDA is driving us all crazy, and keeping us from making better apps. |
| 23 | Dan Wood | The reason that the Mac developer community is thriving so much is the exchange of information among developers to help fill in the gaps in documentation and understanding of the details. Most Mac applications have been developed because of the open access to information about development and the ability to share that information. I can understand the iPhone SDK being under NDA before the release of 2.0, but to continue the silence is making things very bad. It's preventing conferences, classes, books, and tutorials from happening. Is there *anything* good about the NDA continuing? I think not. |
| 24 | Marcel Molina | |
| 25 | Robert Marini | |
| 26 | Timothy Ritchey | |
| 27 | Brent Simmons | |
| 28 | Tim Buchheim | |
| 29 | Mark Dalrymple | Not that internet petitions do a lot of good, but I must say the iPhone SDK NDA (and other TLAs) are impeding the developer community, and impeding the development of high quality software for the device. A lot of free support is developer-to-developer.; and right now many of us are working in a vacuum. And vacuums suck. |
| 30 | Ryan Goodlett | |
| 31 | Anonymous | |
| 32 | Chris Ryland | I'm an iPhone developer, and I desperately need to be able to share comments and questions in public discussion groups. |
| 33 | Benjamin Reed | I want to be able to commit iphone-related open-source code! |
| 34 | Mitchell Koch | |
| 35 | Jonathan Wight | Set my people free! |
| 36 | Greg Wiseman | |
| 37 | Rod Schmidt | Please lift the NDA and approve all the developer applications |
| 38 | Adam Leonard | |
| 39 | Anonymous | |
| 40 | Anonymous | It’s difficult to develop for a platform that you can’t discuss with anyone. |
| 41 | Alexander Repty | It is about time. |
| 42 | Charles Parnot | |
| 43 | Jean-Denis Muys | |
| 44 | Gernot Poetsch | There are much too many bugs and poorly documented details for one developer to be able to work on more complicated stuff without being able to consult others. The NDA is severely harming the platform. |
| 45 | Theodore Rattei | |
| 46 | Anonymous | |
| 47 | Anonymous | |
| 48 | Klaas Pieter Annema | |
| 49 | Florian Albrecht | IMHO, part of the success of the Mac Software Market is related to the great community that exists for sharing information on all levels, from business related to technology related aspects. There clearly is the need for an iPhone community and the basis for that could not be better, as a big part of iPhone developers are very active members of the Mac community! |
| 50 | Florent Pillet | Please lift the NDA. We need to be able to share experience, tips, tricks & pitfalls |