HS2 - Please re-route to avoid Gloucester Avenue Homes. London NW1

Signatures 38 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: Michela Wrong on Dec 31, 2012

   Comments: I understand the longterm need to update Britain's rail network. What I don't understand is why HS2 cannot run underneath the existing track, rather than directly under the building I live in, Darwin Court, which is bound to produce vibrations and affect the stability of the building. Rather a lot of people live here. Please explain why this is the case.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Francine Epstein on Dec 31, 2012

   Comments: Why cant the line be re routed to go under the existing railway lines instead of going directly under Darwin Court.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Harold Seftel on Dec 31, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Belinda Hollyer on Dec 31, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Jeffrey Young on Dec 31, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Joanne Chappell on Dec 31, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Annabel Leventon on Dec 31, 2012

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Patricia Bertram on Jan 1, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2013

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Barry Barker on Jan 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Gerald Rosen on Jan 1, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Desmond Astley-Cooper on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments: I agree.......it's a small adjustment which would make a big difference!

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Randa Astley-Cooper on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Chahine Yamine on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Alexey Nenarokov on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments: Please don't risk destroying/damaging homes when there is an viable alternative

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Michael Brandman on Jan 2, 2013

    Comments: The proximity of the entrance of the proposed tunnel to buildings in Gloucester Avenue means that the tunnel can not achieve it maximum projected depth under all those buildings. In consequence the structural and general integrity of some of those buildings (including risk from vibrations) are unnecessarily put at risk.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 3, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Patricia Bertram on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Dorian Hayes on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: K A Ross on Jan 4, 2013

    Comments: This is an eminently sensible - and feasible - alternative to the current HS2 proposal. Please listen and make the necessary adjustment.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Gerald Rosen on Jan 6, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: E. Jane Dickson on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments: The above proposal seems eminently sensible and would alleviate much concern and uncertainty on the part of local residents.

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Teri Olins on Jan 7, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 8, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Celia Newman on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 9, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Tom Hankinson on Jan 11, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 12, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Tijen O'Reilly on Jan 14, 2013

    Comments: as a resident at gloucester avenue camden i think this is a pointless train line.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Stevie Dean on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Please move it under the Railway, it will save Hs2 Money as well as make sense and show you are listening to the people

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Andy Dean on Jan 15, 2013

    Comments: Please move the line under existing Railway tracks.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Mark Gossington on Feb 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Alison Cable on Mar 4, 2013

    Comments:

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Moray MacLennan on Apr 2, 2013

    Comments: Proper costing of what is obviously better for peoples lives needs to be undertaken. The whole rationale is about money and the UK P& L. Current arguments for the scheme are based on an extremely amateur and paper thin projections. Having spent my career plotting growth for companies it is fairly simple to see the case for is guess work and crossed fingers. The ultimate objective is one we all subscribe to but I am 90% certain this will not deliver and be an embarrassing error and growth would be far more likely if invested in the digital economy. I could go on..

    Flag

Page: 1