Signatures 131 total
-
51
Name: Wendy Bonilla on Jul 29, 2004State: VACountry: USComments: I think that she earn that tittle and it should had neven taken off.Flag
-
52
Name: Lyne Fisher on Aug 4, 2004State: GACountry: USComments: She didn't need the title for people to see what a great woman she was.Flag
-
53
Name: Olga Humeniuk on Aug 14, 2004State:Country: CAComments: I was in the group however I have been away from some important news.Flag
-
54
Name: Katelyn Humeniuk on Aug 15, 2004State:Country: CAComments: I do really think that Queen Eliazabeth 2, should really listen to the people that cares about proper protcol HRH Princess Diana should be. She made sure that Diana suffered the shame of her son's cheating with parker bowels and accepts that, yet her uncle when abdicated and married wallis, she objected. where's loyality lie now. charles should abdicate now,and let his son take over, for all the lies and misery he did to his sons mother.Flag
-
55
Name: Katelyn Humeniuk on Aug 15, 2004State:Country: CAComments: I do really think that Queen Eliazabeth 2, should really listen to the people that cares about proper protcol HRH Princess Diana should be. She made sure that Diana suffered the shame of her son's cheating with parker bowels and accepts that, yet her uncle when abdicated and married wallis, she objected. where's loyality lie now. charles should abdicate now,and let his son take over, for all the lies and misery he did to his sons mother.Flag
-
56
Name: Chris Van Dam on Sep 19, 2004State: CACountry: USComments: diana did so much for so many and gave the title some justice. she deserves to be remembered properlyFlag
-
57
Name: Kevin Miller on Sep 19, 2004State: PACountry: USComments: Despite Royal Custom,DIANA should've never been ROBBED of the HRH part of Her Title just because She had to divorce the heir to the Throne.To we,Her True Fans,She's Always been HRH,anyway so Your Majesty may as well Officially Reinstate Her.Flag
-
58
Name: Debbie Reynolds on Sep 23, 2004State: INCountry: USComments:Flag
-
59
Name: Becky Stanley on Sep 24, 2004State: ILCountry: USComments:Flag
-
60
Name: Anne Eversley on Oct 6, 2004State:Country: UKComments:Flag
-
61
Name: Philip Growden on Oct 31, 2004State:Country: UKComments:Flag
-
62
Name: Rebecca Rinda on Nov 8, 2004State: TNCountry: USComments: She is & always will be the mother of the future King of England and SHOULD have retained the title HRH..Flag
-
63
Name: RUSSELL-DAVIS ANDREW on Nov 15, 2004State:Country: UKComments: IN RESPECT TO THE FACT OF HER BEING MOTHER OF THE FUTURE KING. TO GAIN RESPECT AND LOYALTY TO THE MONARCY FOLLOWING THIS SENSELESS AND MALICIOUS ACT AND TO HONOUR THE MEMORY OF "THE PRINCESS OF WALES" IN A PROFOUND WAY AS DESERVED FOR BEING AN INSPIRATION TO THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD IN A UNIQUE WAY IMPOSSIBLE FOR ANYONE TO FOLLOW..... GOD BLESS THE "QUEEN OF HEARTS" AMEN.Flag
-
64
Name: Kevin Miller on Dec 12, 2004State: PACountry: USComments: I Truly Believe with all My Heart that taking the Royal Title,Her Royal Highness away from Diana was The Wrong thing to do.Just the Fact that She was Still a Princess should be enough of a reason to allow Her to keep the HRH,too.Those 2 titles belong together.I Feel this and Believe this with All of the English Blood that's in Me.Flag
-
65
Name: SUSAN CHICKOWSKI on Dec 12, 2004State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
66
Name: Louise Sargent on Dec 12, 2004State:Country: NZComments: Honour our Princess in death, she deserves it.Flag
-
67
Name: Dr. Chris Roman on Dec 13, 2004State: VACountry: USComments: I believe that Diana's title should be restored. She did a lot for the monarchy during her lifetime. Yet because her husband was a looser, cheated on her was not her and did not want to make their marriage work was no fault of her own.Flag
-
68
Name: Olga Humeniuk on Dec 13, 2004State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
69
Name: Sylvia Krupenin on Dec 13, 2004State:Country: AUComments:Flag
-
70
Name: Claire Neville-Hillenbrand on Dec 13, 2004State: NYCountry: USComments:Flag
-
71
Name: Judith Powers on Jan 10, 2005State: WVCountry: USComments:Flag
-
72
Name: Danielle Deininger on Jan 26, 2005State: VACountry: USComments:Flag
-
73
Name: Tina Gilbert on Feb 11, 2005State: NCCountry: USComments: It should of never been removed from her in the first plce. She has done far more for the Royal family than any other Royal before or since.Flag
-
74
Name: NORA BURGESS on Feb 11, 2005State:Country: UKComments: Diana is the only one of all the royals, who is a true H R H.Flag
-
75
Name: Amber Asebedo on Feb 14, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
76
Name: Regina Krause on Mar 9, 2005State: KSCountry: USComments: It would do no harm to restore the HRH title to Diana. Though flawed and fragile, she gave the world a genuine hero. Unlike the Dutchess of Windsor, she was an asset to the Royal Family. The world is more the beautiful for her life. Sincerely, Regina Townsend KrauseFlag
-
77
Name: Patti Harris Harris on Mar 14, 2005State: GACountry: USComments: Diana was/is FAR more deserving of her HRH title than Camilla Parker Bowles. Diana EARNED the title with her extensive work in charity and her kindness towards others, unlike The Mistress Camilla, who earned the title ON HER BACK!!!!Flag
-
78
Name: Diane Delorme on Mar 24, 2005State:Country: CAComments:Flag
-
79
Name: Barbara Lloyd on Mar 30, 2005State:Country: UKComments:Flag
-
80
Name: Luis Mendoza on Apr 25, 2005State: MDCountry: USComments: I believe that being the mother of the Future king...she should have never lost that title...If Camilla is a HRH now...being divorced...then why is Diana beneath her I think she should go down in History AS HRH PRINCESS DIANA, Princess of wales...and have more seniority than CAMilla....Flag
-
81
Name: Mary Brown on May 25, 2005State: NVCountry: USComments:Flag
-
82
Name: Neville Fairey on Jun 14, 2005State:Country: UKComments: Too late now,--the "people" don`t matterFlag
-
83
Name: Charlene Renee Good on Jul 8, 2005State: NJCountry: USComments: The title HRH should definitely be restored to our beloved Diana. Camilla does not deserve the title HRH!Flag
-
84
Name: Karen Caradonna on Aug 30, 2005State: NYCountry: USComments:Flag
-
85
Name: Janice Brown on Sep 21, 2005State: VACountry: USComments: she is the mother of the future king and she has a right to that title even if she has passed away she was and always will be the peoples princessFlag
-
86
Name: Ann Neil on Oct 11, 2005State:Country: CAComments: Our dear Princess should never have lost her title in the first place. The Queen was clearly in her usual cold form when she performed this particular act.Flag
-
87
Name: Janis Harris on Nov 5, 2005State:Country: UKComments: I believe she should have never ever had it taken away from her. She did a lot for the Royal Family but look at the way they are now!Flag
-
88
Name: Andrew Russell-davis on Nov 6, 2005State:Country: UKComments: Title offered back by Sir Robert Fellowes, Diana's brother in law and H.M.'S private secretary but Earl Spencer, Diana's brother refused it!!Flag
-
89
Name: Calley Rawlings on Nov 13, 2005State: WACountry: USComments:Flag
-
90
Name: Rhenae Strauss on Nov 27, 2005State: TXCountry: USComments: Since Diana is a direct Stewart descent and the mother of the Princes William and Harry she should have her title back.Flag
-
91
Name: Sarah Jonasson on Nov 28, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: Sarah Jonasson on Nov 28, 2005State:Country:Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Andre Seif on Jan 18, 2006State: NECountry: BWComments:Flag
-
94
Name: Janice Laxton on Feb 3, 2006State:Country: UKComments: She was HRH and should and should always be known as such.Flag
-
95
Name: Diana Halasz on Feb 3, 2006State: CACountry: USComments: She was the mother of the FUTURE KING and of noble blood. She should be HRHFlag
-
96
Name: Jan Jan on Jun 28, 2006State: GACountry: ZAComments:Flag
-
97
Name: Sara Sara on Jul 5, 2006State: WACountry: LCComments:Flag
-
98
Name: Alex Alex on Jul 6, 2006State: FLCountry: VCComments:Flag
-
99
Name: Jan Jan on Jul 6, 2006State: LACountry: ETComments:Flag
-
100
Name: MR.Bob MR.Bob on Jul 7, 2006State: MOCountry: SLComments:Flag