Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 715 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 15 »

  1. 1
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: The City has dropped the ball on this one at our expense!!!
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: John Ridgway on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: I live on the 300 block of E 25th. The condo development that is referenced here will on the street behind me (24th).
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Susan Meyers on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Do only the wealthy developers have property rights now Shame on you!
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Sanford Criner on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Adrian Reed on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: I have personally worked to ensure blocks in the Woodland Heights would be protected by the prevailing lot size ordinance. Please work to make sure this protection is real
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Cliff Davis on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Renee Cross on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Stan Cross on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Beth Walsh on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Will Whitehead on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: John Hall on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Christine Hemmen on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Timothy Beeson on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Residents of historic neighborhoods have had enough of the city government pandering to developers. Where are your heads How much money is changing hands to help builders get around the rules It's disgusting and we're fed up!
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Kathleen A Boyd on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: Rebecca Berend on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Joan S. Duplantis on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Don't let what's happened in Montrose with all the 3 & 4 story monstrosities happen in the Heights or any other historic neighborhood.
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Lorna Mangus on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Peggy Horn on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Dana Whitney on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: It is unconcionable that the pro-developer planning commission cannot see that there is value in retaining neighborhood integrity. Altering minimum setbacks and allowing loopholes in deed restrictions may gain the developer and the city a few dollars more in the short term, but will wreak havoc and loss of a sense of place in the long term.
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Peggy Amante on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Let's hope the Planning Commission will come to their senses one of these days and actually DO something to preserve these neighborhoods!!
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Taylor Moore on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Lauren Whitehead on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Bruce Kyckelhahn on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: Bert Edmundson on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Ann Benzon on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Storm the Bastile!!
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Carolyn Vasisko on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Evelyn L. Merz on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: The action of the Planning Commission is contrary to common sense and sabotages the whole point of neighborhood involvement.
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Councilmember Peter Brown on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: As the City becomes more dense, our minimal regulations no longer serve the best interests of developers, property owners or residents. There is development chaos in many traditional neighborhoods, and yet many brownfields and vacant tracts waiting to be developed. The stakeholders must come together to protect our traditional neighborhoods and to promote quality development where different densities make the most sense. In some cities, they call this "planning." Councilmember Peter Brown
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Patty Adamik on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Leigh Hollins on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Please close this loophole in the PVLS ordinance, and go farther than that....strengthen the Historic Preservation Ordinance so that it truly does protect municipally designated Historic Districts
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Nancy Lewallen on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Keep the Old Neighborhoods!!!
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Sarah Castillo on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: I live in Northside just past Hogan and Main St with new townhomes popping up everyday. We know that all the people that live out in the suburbs would love to expand 45 and pave right over our hundred year old neighborhood. One by one, we have to preserve our older, single family homes and make Houston, not Sugarland and Spring, a desirable and affordable place to live.
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Gary Laird on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Z. Brett Mize on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Plug the loophole ! We need stronger ordinances to protect the character of our older neighborhoods !
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: We as Americans need to preserve our older buildings as historical and architectural treasures. Europeans understand this; why don't we
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Theresa Doyle on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: I'm a Heights resident and care about preserving the character of my neighborhood.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Lisa Hayes on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Ralf Brehm on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: We in Eastwood have been working diligently to protect the integrity of our neighborhood by collecting signatures for the Prevailing Lot Size Some have been approved and others are still pending. If they take this tool away, what options to we have to preserve the character of our neighborhood and homes.
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Linda Krueger on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Rob Greenstein on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Anne Thobae on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: For the 4th largest city in the nation, it is a travesty that we have the weakest preservation laws/ordinances of any major US city. And now to furthermore jeopardize, compromise and not acknowledge the intent of the preservation ordinances that citizens and elected officials have worked hard to put in place in order to protect our cultural landscape is an absolute crime. We truly are a city without a soul--we continue to pander to the developers and speculators and are destroying our history and quality of life at at alarming rate. As a native Houstonian--it is heartbreaking to witness and disempowering to be a victim of such a rampant violation of smart growth and the outright destruction of our neighborhoods.
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Robert on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Its deplorable that high rises are eating up lots these days in Houston. nature bats last even further now. Where is the consideration for nature need and human need
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Anonymous on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Amanda Boyaki on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: Although I live and work in the Montrose area the same condo stuffing is happening in our single family residences. A home that needs renovation will be torn down and six or eight three story townhomes will be squeezed onto a lot. This puts an undue burden on the neighborhoods. Streets have an increase in traffic, people have to park on the streets, and the sewer and water systems in these older neighborhoods are pushed to their limits. Its not that I do not like modern architecture or that I am not a fan of renovation because I know as a preservationist and architectural historian that some of the older homes are in need of drastic changes. I object to putting so many of them on one lot, cutting down all the old trees and hiring illegal immigrants to work for pennies. I would advocate that two per lot be the maximum, unless Perry Homes wants to pay to update all the services that are needed. I am sure Perry Homes could give a damn about city services after they make their profits, after paying their immigrant workers under the table. Am I picking on Perry on purpose Absolutely. Perry gave an enormous amount of money to Governor Perry and if anyone has a problem with his new construction they can complain to the board he set up to resolve these disputes putting consumers in a lose-lose situation and in need of a really good lawyer. I only wish a petition like this could at least inconvenience the unscrupulous builders in this city.
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Julia Hellums on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Terence O'Rourke on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Alix Dunn on Nov 17, 2006
    Comments: thank you for your efforts.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, ... 15 »

Sponsored links