Powered by iPetitions - Start your online petition now

Signatures 89 total

Page: 1, 2

  1. 1
    Name: Matt Doble on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  2. 2
    Name: Myles Lambert on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments: As living in Hewish for many years this would spoil the area.
    Flag
  3. 3
    Name: Danielle Doble on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments: I think it's disgusting that you want to ruin the beautiful countryside with this ugly, noisy turbine. Will absolutely ruin the countryside and the surrounding villages!
    Flag
  4. 4
    Name: Anna Belton on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  5. 5
    Name: Dominic Wright on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  6. 6
    Name: Tom Frecknall on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  7. 7
    Name: Lauren Clarke on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  8. 8
    Name: Maria Frecknall on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments: my family home is right by this and i think its an awful thing to put there.. all those key points will affect my family home and the neighbours around!!
    Flag
  9. 9
    Name: Matthew Belton on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments: This Will spoil a view that many have come to love and will scare the race horses the use the road!!!
    Flag
  10. 10
    Name: Beth Martin on Jan 9, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  11. 11
    Name: Mrs J Rudkin on Jan 10, 2013
    Comments: Noise issue. We have hoses and othe animals. I don't want to live with a continuous noise- I love to listen to the birds and wildlife around me. Conservation issue. The view. De value our property What do any of the villagers gain out of this?
    Flag
  12. 12
    Name: Mr & Mrs K H Curtis on Jan 11, 2013
    Comments: Do not allow this application to open the flood gates to others being erected in the area
    Flag
  13. 13
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 11, 2013
    Comments: This should definitely not be allowed to happen, once again, the countryside is going to be blighted by this huge monster of a thing. How dare someone want to ruin everyone else pleasure, just for their own selfish means. It has got to stop, the ME society is growing like a cancer.
    Flag
  14. 14
    Name: Mrs Cginger on Jan 11, 2013
    Comments: absolute disgrace to site this noise polluting aberration so close to residential housing
    Flag
  15. 15
    Name: R. Franklin on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments: This is seen as a stalking horse by which to populate South Somerset with a herd of these costly, inefficient, unsightly and unhealthy erections. Far better to adopt the solar panel technology - efficient, low rise, silent and low maintenance - as already in place at a neighbouring farm.
    Flag
  16. 16
    Name: Don Yeomans on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  17. 17
    Name: Lorraine Yeomans on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  18. 18
    Name: Chris Simpson on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments: Too big Not viable, solar panels less intrusive will open floodgates for more in a beautifull rural area Parish council did not represent local opinion,what is the point of them?
    Flag
  19. 19
    Name: Lynda Willis on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  20. 20
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  21. 21
    Name: Pamela Priest on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments: Concerned about noise and light pollution, distress caused to local wildlife, particularly bats and negative impact on house value.
    Flag
  22. 22
    Name: Julia Chapman on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments: Very worried about negative effect on village of Hewish, wildlife and noise pollution.
    Flag
  23. 23
    Name: Frank Andrade on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  24. 24
    Name: L Veale on Jan 12, 2013
    Comments: This wind turbine would destroy the tranquility of this lovely area and affect the quality of life of near neighbours that surely cannot be justifiable.
    Flag
  25. 25
    Name: Abbie Whitehouse on Jan 13, 2013
    Comments: There is no need to erect a 40 metre wind turbine in a quiet village such as Hewish.
    Flag
  26. 26
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 13, 2013
    Comments: A wind turbine of this size would be quite out of keeping in this landscape.
    Flag
  27. 27
    Name: Dave Chapman on Jan 14, 2013
    Comments: Hewish is within the 1.4 mile radius of the suggested site - this clearly contradicts current government advise.
    Flag
  28. 28
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  29. 29
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 14, 2013
    Comments: When will people learn that wind turbines are NOT the answer to our power issues.
    Flag
  30. 30
    Name: Kimberley McLellan on Jan 14, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  31. 31
    Name: Andrew Hutchings on Jan 15, 2013
    Comments: Wind turbines are known to be inefficient and the noise and light pollution will spoil this beautiful landscape in which I have lived for over 60 years.
    Flag
  32. 32
    Name: Nick Yeomans on Jan 16, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  33. 33
    Name: Jean Ellis on Jan 16, 2013
    Comments: SSDC's Local Plan states 'The District's Environment is a finite resource to be treasured'. Is this really the way to do it?
    Flag
  34. 34
    Name: Tristan Veale on Jan 17, 2013
    Comments: As a resident of Hewish and a sufferer from sleep deprivation the prospect of the erection of this wind turbine could severely impact upon my health. The effects of wind turbines troubling sleep patterns are proven and well documented and this would be detrimental for all nearby residents.
    Flag
  35. 35
    Name: Karen Marek on Jan 17, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  36. 36
    Name: Brian Follett on Jan 18, 2013
    Comments: What a carbuncle this would impose on our beautiful, God-given South Somerset countryside!
    Flag
  37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 18, 2013
    Comments: These costly white elephants will destroy the beauty of the landscape while making a negligible contribution to issues of global warming.
    Flag
  38. 38
    Name: Simon Titchener on Jan 18, 2013
    Comments: Yet again another small comunity being taken advantage of in the search of gain by a few greedy inderviduals who use the excuse that they are in some way saving the world and securing the future for our children. I have worked in an African country for 5 years and are used to these types of crazy projects they call it Green Washing it is all about money and nothing else this turbine could bring in £700k p/a tax free so even the tax payer gets nothing out of it!! Boycot Waitrose and Coombe Farm Products and even block the lanes so ther products canot get to the shops. Boycot anything to do with the Parish council as they are not interested in the very people they are suposed to represent, idiots all of them and that is being polite!
    Flag
  39. 39
    Name: Christopher Little on Jan 19, 2013
    Comments: Isolated devices such as this are a real blot on the landscape. The beauty of the landscape is for all to share and anything which diminishes that enjoyment, before it is allowed, should be given the considered opinion of all sides, not just those of the proponents. Clearly, little or no consideration has been given to the views of local residents. This is unacceptable and the permission for this tower should not be given until the views of all parties have been properly voiced and considered.
    Flag
  40. 40
    Name: Janice Little on Jan 19, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  41. 41
    Name: Gary Barrow on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments: I am against the wind turbine
    Flag
  42. 42
    Name: Alex Barrow on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments: I am against the wind turbine
    Flag
  43. 43
    Name: Natalie Hodges on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  44. 44
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments: I moved to the area for the peace and quiet, the beautiful unspoilt countryside and the wonderful wildlife in this area. Currently this is the 360 degree view from our house so a wind turbine would not be a welcome addition to this amazing rural landscape. I cannot comprehend the vast size of this proposed turbine and the massive implication in such a small rural community. There will be noise pollution. Once one turbine has been approved this will set a precedent for further applications in the area. The developments in Crewkerne are gradually creeping over the hill into this rural are please don't allow a 'development' to be planted in the middle of the countryside.
    Flag
  45. 45
    Name: Judith Robinson on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  46. 46
    Name: Rowlandblake on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments: Very opposed to windmills.Very noisy and devalue property .Unfair
    Flag
  47. 47
    Name: Mrs M Warner on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  48. 48
    Name: Mr M Warner on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  49. 49
    Name: Bradley Warner on Jan 20, 2013
    Comments:
    Flag
  50. 50
    Name: Anonymous on Jan 21, 2013
    Comments: Sack the Parish Council for not representing the good folk of Hewish! Ah well, at least it is NIMBY if it were then I'd be livid.Whilst we will all need renewable energy solutions they do require careful thought;none seems to have been given to this project.
    Flag

Page: 1, 2

Sponsored links