Bring Greyhawk back!

Signatures 31 total

Page: 1

1. 1
   Name: David Fiorito on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments: Pleas honor the memory of the co-creator of D&D by keeping his world of Greyhawk a part of D&D for years to come.

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Colin Lloyd on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments: My first real setting was Greyhawk, and it's still my favourite one to play in with an almost limitless potential for adventuring....but don't try to shoe-horn it with 4E races and sensibilities. Leave the work to Paizo, who will do an excellent, faithful and reverent job of re-releasing Greyhawk!

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Cameron King on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments: If it ain't Greyhawk, it ain't really D&D.

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Jeremy Mcgillan on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Tharen The Damned on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: James Hyssong on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Chris Mortika on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments: No rush. I'd rather have a good Greyhawk than a hasty Greyhawk. --Chris (one of the writers of WG 7)

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Georg Wallner on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: James Boland on Mar 5, 2008

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Jason Rowland on Mar 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: David Cline on Mar 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Adam Anderson on Mar 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Keith Edwards on Mar 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Jason T. Roeder on Mar 5, 2008

    Comments: Paizo would probably do a great job with Greyhawk...

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Gary Van Binsbergen on Mar 5, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Dinos D on Mar 6, 2008

    Comments: Either way (WotC or outside licence) a "Handle with care" should be attached to the project.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: David Sancho on Mar 11, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Deepfire on Mar 13, 2008

    Comments: Please, Greyhawk 3.5 from Paizo would be a sure buy!

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 13, 2008

    Comments: Greyhawk was my first campaign setting and my son's as well.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Allen Dawson on Mar 13, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Chris Perkins on Mar 13, 2008

    Comments: D&D without Greyhawk just doesn't cut it for me. Please continue support for Greyhawk in 4th edition. Thanks

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: James Johnson on Mar 14, 2008

    Comments: Greyhawk Greyhawk Greyhawk!!!

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Stefan Beate on Mar 14, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Steven Lawley on Mar 14, 2008

    Comments: The first and the best.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 14, 2008

    Comments: Greyhawk = D&D

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Gavagai on Mar 15, 2008

    Comments: ... and Maure Castle deluxe edition!

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Anonymous on Mar 15, 2008

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Mike Livingood on Mar 16, 2008

    Comments: With Ruins of Greyhawk having done well. The demand for GH products should not be ignored. Gary Holian and Erik Mona would do an exceptional job on the product and are greatly respected in the industry and a book should not be started without either of their input.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Jan Erik S on Apr 2, 2008

    Comments: Please do. It's a lot better than FR ever was though new FR might be better than the old one.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Jim Hogge on Sep 13, 2008

    Comments: Greyhawk is intrinsic to Dungeons and Dragons. You cannot have one without the other. 4e has gone to great lengths to produce a neutral setting. Incorporating some Greyhawk elements and hybridizing the setting with the Forgotten Realms and Eberron. I would like to see Greyhawk revitalized and defined in a d20 product. Lets give the Old Egg his salutations and do this right!

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Anonymous on Dec 25, 2008

    Comments: I am a DM and im currently still on 3.5 Greyhawk setting. I like it for it complexity but i still respect WoTC for making it easyer for everyone by making 4th Ed. But the think about it is that I cant see Greyhawk in it sure there is some parts there but i kinda fellt sad to see most of the deitys gone and replaysed by some new ones and some from Forgotten Realms and Eberon. Plus i liked the alighment like thay where it meant more roleplay and we could have lot of laughs when some one had to work in his alighment. The big dissapointment was that there was no longer the old story, i know that its is sometimes changed during new editions but this time it was renderd opsolete, plus thay changed the monsters manual alot! i did not like the succubus to be a devil for one example and makeing less templates and more "versions" of the monsters wasnt really what i was looking for. Sure it was done in MM3 and 4 but but MM1 was the common monsters now there are new monsters witch arent used that much.. yet. Most of all i missed the Greyhawk setting the dm guide just told you how to make worlds and dungeons and was mostely a resepy book. there im done. Sorry for my grammar.

    Flag

Page: 1