Signatures 256 total
- 1
- 2
- 3
-
4
Name: Jill And Scott Klappenbach on Oct 21, 2007Comments: We OPPOSE ANY CHANGES AT ALL TO SLIGO CREEK GOLF COURSE.Flag
- 5
-
6
Name: Jill Martinez on Oct 22, 2007Comments: I strong oppose this idea based on the environmental impact it would have. We need to keep our green space as green as we can and favor the water and wildlife over revenue. Some places should be off limits. It very hard going back once we've sacrificed the space.Flag
-
7
Name: Louise Hall on Oct 22, 2007Comments: Sligo is the only remaining course in the most densely populated are of the county. To substantially reduced the size of the course would be a disservice to this communty.Flag
- 8
- 9
-
10
Name: Cheryl Gustitus on Oct 22, 2007Comments: The MCRA proposal for Sligo Creek golf course will have a negative impact on the surrounding environment and is inappropriate for the neighborhoods that SCGC resides within and will have a negative impact on the quality of life for those of us who live here. As a long-time resident and Montgomery County taxpayer, I adamantly oppose MCRA's proposal.Flag
- 11
- 12
-
13
Name: Hugh Turner on Oct 22, 2007Comments: The envisioned facility is inconsistent with the nature of the Park and the surrounding neighborhoods. It would negatively impact quality of life and environment in the immediate area of the facility. Please do not allow it to move forward.Flag
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
-
18
Name: Margaret Herbers on Oct 22, 2007Comments: Absolutely the Sligo Creek area does not need this kind of project.Flag
- 19
- 20
-
21
Name: Mary Singer on Oct 22, 2007Comments: It's a great little course for anyone who wants to go out and play 9 holes, and for learning to play golf. It's also a good habitat for birds and wildlife. To make a mini-golf and driving range would spoil all that.Flag
-
22
Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2007Comments: We are strongly opposed to the proposed plans to Sligo Golf course that would install night lights, add a mini course and driving range. These additions I can not contribute to our neighborhood, traffic congestion, or environmental health of the creek. I am more than happy to pay taxes to maintain our parks and am certain that I do not want to turn this public asset into a for-profit venture.Flag
- 23
- 24
-
25
Name: Karen Howland on Oct 23, 2007Comments: I strongly oppose the current proposal for modifying Sligo Creek Golf Course. I play this course regularly and shortening it or sticking a double decked driving range would not only ruin the appeal, but have a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. My house is directly across the park from the course. It's bad enough to we have the hospital and cell tower lights disrupting our night sky. The thought of having bright lights shine into our neighborhood is horrendous. Putting aside all the obvious environmental arguments against the proposal, the Revenue Authority has provided NO data to the public that supports the fiscal viability of the proposal. How many rounds of mini golf or buckets of balls will it take to pay for this travesty Show us the market research that suggests this would actually be successful. The effect of more traffic, noise, etc. will decrease the value of the homes in this area. Preserve the green space and make responsible decisions. Don't sell out the best part of living in this area - trees, parks, and wildlife for financial greed.Flag
- 26
-
27
Name: Ashley Files Flory on Oct 23, 2007Comments: I am opposed to the changes proposed by the Montgomery County Revenue Authority. First and foremost, Sligo Creek Park is a park -- not a metropolitan cash generator.Flag
- 28
-
29
Name: Anonymous on Oct 23, 2007Comments: Don't mess up our dear, local course to satisfy some fat-cat robber barons (my son's words).Flag
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
-
35
Name: Eileen Hartnett on Oct 23, 2007Comments: It's a great golf course! Don't fix what's not broken!Flag
- 36
- 37
- 38
-
39
Name: Adrienne McBride on Oct 23, 2007Comments: Please don't allow these measures that will destroy our creek and destroy our neighborhood with increased traffic. We already have too much traffic and inconsiderate drivers who do not respect our neighborhood.Flag
-
40
Name: RG Steinman on Oct 23, 2007Comments: I support only those changes that improve the health of Sligo Creek and that are compatible with the Park and the neighborhoods.Flag
-
41
Name: Miguel Welanetz on Oct 23, 2007Comments: I feel the community in which this course operates and the patrons of the Sligo G.C. will be better served if this plan were placed elsewhere in the county.Flag
- 42
-
43
Name: Joe Tinkelman on Oct 23, 2007Comments: What's wrong with a quiet, peaceful, not terribly popular golf course where you can go for a leisurely nine holes without worrying if you are holding up the foursome behind you Does every golf facility have to be serious or educational Why do we need to use this course as a money-maker What's the good of a driving range if, when you actually play the course, you can no longer use your driver (as in executive nine layouts)Flag
- 44
-
45
Name: Catherine L Salem on Oct 24, 2007Comments: We actually do use the course currently. We would continue to use the course if improvements are environmentally sound. In my opinion that excludes driving range facilities and lighted mini-golf. Let's make responsible decisions together.Flag
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50