Oppose Granite Mountain Wind Project, Apple Valley

Signatures 65 total

Page: 1, 2

1. 1
   Name: Sarah on Mar 24, 2008

   City of Residence: Apple Valley

   Comments: Please consider another area for this project. This location is too close to the residents of Apple Valley and will spoil our "way of life" by ruining our eastern skyline. I also oppose this project because it's funded by our tax dollars!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Sarah on Mar 24, 2008

   City of Residence: Apple Valley

   Comments: Please consider another area for this project. This location is too close to the residents of Apple Valley and will spoil our "way of life" by ruining our eastern skyline. I also oppose this project because it's funded by our tax dollars!

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Maxwell on Mar 24, 2008

   City of Residence: Apple Valley

   Comments: Greed and poor Planning do not constitute a fair reason to use my tax dollars. There are less intrusive forms of " renewable energy" .

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Roger on Mar 26, 2008

   City of Residence: Lucerne Valley

   Comments: There appears to be a hundred of these projects proposed and I am concerned about the cumulative affects on the environment, aesthetics, and a reduction of access to public lands.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: John on Apr 3, 2008

   City of Residence: Apple Valley

   Comments: These windmills will be an eye-sore for not only Apple Valley, but the neighboring cities as well.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Julie on Apr 3, 2008

   City of Residence: Apple Valley

   Comments: Please do not take away our land for this project.

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Brian on Apr 3, 2008

   City of Residence: monrovia

   Comments: The wind energy project at Granite Mtn. jeapordizes a significant chunk of outdoor recreation, and will likely result in further public lands being taken away from the responsible off-road community.

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Jeffrey on Apr 7, 2008

   City of Residence: (east) Apple Valley

   Comments: I can't believe I missed the meeting! I have lived here for over 30 years and never would have dreamed that these horrible towers would be built in my own backyard! Why on earth can't they be built far in the distance perhaps way out there off of Barstow road I feel sorry for all of the people who have bought and invested their life savings to live here and to now have to deal with this situation....because this is a nice area to retire and enjoy a rural way of life.

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Howard on Apr 8, 2008

   City of Residence: Apple Valley

   Comments: there are much better choices avaliable than this site.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: April on Apr 15, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: I am strongly opposed to this project and will forward this link to as many people as I can.

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 15, 2008

    City of Residence: Azusa, CA

    Comments: My children live in the area

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Robert on Apr 15, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: I am in favor of alternative energy sources but this project is just poorly located. With the size of San Bernardino County there are areas with little to no population that would be more suitable for this and like projects.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Gerald on Apr 15, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: It's not that I am opposed to the idea of renewable energy sources, I feel the location right in a populated area of the valley has not taken into consideration the long term effect to the environment as well as the property owners! The other objection is the way( or lack of) in which the notification was sent out to the public at large. It was a sorry attempt at doing the bare minium to be in compliance and still hoping enough people wouldn't really know about it until they awake one morning to hear and see these obtrusive structures in their backyard. We owe it to do better for our community. Let's look to areas less populated...the desert is pretty big!

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Lorraine on Apr 16, 2008

    City of Residence: Town of Apple Valley

    Comments: I am opposed to the projest being so close to homes and to undevelopment wildlife areas.

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Carol on Apr 16, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: Sure way to ruin view property.

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: David on Apr 17, 2008

    City of Residence: apple valley

    Comments: If it is true that this development is funded with tax payer dollars and developers get big tax breaks, and it lowers our property values, then common sense would dictate a no Vote! D Wilson

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Doug on Apr 17, 2008

    City of Residence: La Habra

    Comments: Keep public lands out of private hands

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Steven on Apr 17, 2008

    City of Residence: North Hollywood

    Comments: I'm opposed to this project because I'm against actions that may remove land from recreational use.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Barbara on Apr 18, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: I have been a resident of the high desert since 1975. I have raised all three of my boys here, as a matter of fact we ALL graduated from Apple High. We hike, ride horses, have picnics, collect rocks and many other family gatherings in the beautiful outdoors. It would be a absolute shame to see this happen to our peaceful High Desert!! I am totally against this.

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Albert on Apr 18, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: The ramifictions of the project have not been throughly thought through and investigated.

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Dori on Apr 18, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple valley

    Comments: no

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Jeffrey on Apr 19, 2008

    City of Residence: apple valley

    Comments: I oppose this from happening. If they're necessary, put the me out where there are no living structures like between Lucerne and palm desert.

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: RONALD on Apr 19, 2008

    City of Residence: APPLE VALLEY

    Comments: APPLE VALLEY DOES NOT NEED A PROJECT LIKE THIS.

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 19, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: There are better ways. We don't need our desert junked up with noisy, ugly trash.

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Hildie on Apr 19, 2008

    City of Residence: Tulsa

    Comments: I oppose this

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Shelly on Apr 19, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: This proposal will create an eyesore on what is one of the only beautiful aspects of this valley, the granite hills. With so much wind in this area surely there is another location that is more suitable

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Gail M. on Apr 19, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: I'am against it.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Gail M. on Apr 19, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: I'm against the ugly things.

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Jon on Apr 21, 2008

    City of Residence: apple valley

    Comments: this will detract from the beauty of fairview valley and the mountains that surround this natural wonderland

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 21, 2008

    City of Residence: Victorville

    Comments: I am totally opposed to this proposal as it will close some lands that I use quite often with my family. And I understand the energy savings will be minimal if any.

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Nicole on Apr 21, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: This will decrease the value of our first home!

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Clint on Apr 21, 2008

    City of Residence: apple valley

    Comments: THE WINDMILLS CAN BE PUT ANYWHERE IN THE DESERT,WHY LET THEM DESTROY A GROWING AREA.TRASHING THE DESERT SKYLINE DOES NOT SOUND LIKE ECO FREINDLY ENERGY TO ME.MIGRATING AND PREDITORY BIRDS THAT ARE NATRUALTO THE AREA HERE WILL BE KILLED BY THESE GIANT MACHINES! PLEASE DONT WREAK OUR DESERT.

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Earl on Apr 22, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: If installed the public will loose access to the areas, which are used for recreation now. Additionally the impact will spread from the area, because the transmission infrastructure is not there and will be required.

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: GEORGE on Apr 22, 2008

    City of Residence: APPLE VALLEY

    Comments: DEFINITELY OPPOSED!!!

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Annie on Apr 23, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: Utterly unacceptable.

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Marla on Apr 27, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley Sphere

    Comments: I am in the county area of Fairview Valley and the view directly out my window is the very ridgeline these wind turbines are to blight! I strongly believe in alternative energy production..... it is the blatant lack of intelligent choice of installation sites that I oppose.

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Anonymous on Apr 28, 2008

    City of Residence: Whittier, CA

    Comments: Save public lands from Private use so that we can continue to enjoy our public lands and recreation!!

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: David on Apr 28, 2008

    City of Residence: Long Beach

    Comments: this sucks, more development to take away from our open recreational spaces.

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Casey on Apr 28, 2008

    City of Residence: Applevalley

    Comments: As a power plant opperator in the high desert I'm all for alturnitive energy sorces, but I'm am strongly opposed to the closure of my public lands.

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Craig on Apr 28, 2008

    City of Residence: Applevalley

    Comments: As a power plant opperator in the high desert I'm all for alturnitive energy sorces, but I'm am strongly opposed to the closure of my public lands.

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Edward on Apr 30, 2008

    City of Residence: san jose

    Comments: If those guys want to build windmills, why don't they just build on mountains where there is no impact on people's life, there are many mountains they can build those windmills, why build in a city like apple valley which will hurt many residents it is crazy.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Nicholas on May 1, 2008

    City of Residence: Twentynine Palms, CA

    Comments: I don't understand how areas for recreation can be shut down for threatened or endangered species habitiat...yet areas that are inhabited by the same threatened species can be snatched for commercial use so easily It truly shows how in control the corporations are of our government.

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Sharon on May 2, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: I am totally opposed!

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Sharon on May 2, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: I am totally opposed!

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Brian on May 2, 2008

    City of Residence: Apple Valley

    Comments: They are not needed in this area; the Town of Apple Valley counsel is not in agreement with them being on this particular site. The site can just as well be relocated further north.

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Edward on May 8, 2008

    City of Residence: San Jose

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Edward on May 11, 2008

    City of Residence: San Jose

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Anonymous on May 19, 2008

    City of Residence: Pinon Hills

    Comments: There are other alternatives to choose from. We shouldn't be required to succomb to big business or the government in this way. Don't be bullied.

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: Anonymous on May 31, 2008

    City of Residence: Victorville

    Comments: Due to land use.

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Tgumnrbnw on Feb 21, 2010

    City of Residence: RBdxIbGc

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: 1, 2