Stop the Destruction of Granite Bay's Shoreline!

Signatures 246 total

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 101
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
2. 102
   Name: Lisa Willett on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments: Good job! I had no idea this was happening. Please keep me informed on the progress of this situation. Count on me to do what ever else is needed. We love our community its natural beauty. we feel truly blessed to live here. Lisa Willett and Family

   Flag
3. 103
   Name: Shirley Jake on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 104
   Name: Jeff Woodworth on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
5. 105
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
6. 106
   Name: Erin Holway on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 107
   Name: Julie Knapp on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 108
   Name: Mike Knapp on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 109
   Name: Steve Wetzel on Jul 11, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
10. 110
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 111
    Name: Alan Gonsalves on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 112
    Name: Lisa Handley on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
13. 113
    Name: Michael Ong on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
14. 114
    Name: Betsie Goulart on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 115
    Name: Terry McTague on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 116
    Name: Judy King on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments: There are other formidable options. This is NOT the place to do it for many many reasons.

    Flag
17. 117
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments: We love to use the beach any time we come to visit. I really think it would be a shame to distroy any part of Folsom Lake.

    Flag
18. 118
    Name: Alison & Paul Lanman on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments: My property is adjacent to the state park. I am against them taking our beach for every reason stated and then some.

    Flag
19. 119
    Name: Gary T Nagasawa on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 120
    Name: Laurie Caillot on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 121
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
22. 122
    Name: Elisa Wyatt on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 123
    Name: Jennifer Hart on Jul 11, 2007

    Comments: testing

    Flag
24. 124
    Name: Nabil Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
25. 125
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 126
    Name: Nabil Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
27. 127
    Name: Abdelkarim Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
28. 128
    Name: Kamal Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 129
    Name: Mohammad Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
30. 130
    Name: Samir Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 131
    Name: Zakia Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: My family and I are strongly opposed to the usage of our beach for all the reasons mentioned in the petition. It is not healthy for us or the environment. Please keep us informed, we had no idea that this was even happening.

    Flag
32. 132
    Name: Nada Shehadeh on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: I am only 12 years old, but I don't want to see our lake ruined. I was born here and I would like it to stay the way it is.

    Flag
33. 133
    Name: Kyle Cherry on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: This part of the shore is beautiful, and the increased capacity of the lake is not worth the destruction of the aforementioned. There are alternatives.

    Flag
34. 134
    Name: Pamela Emick on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: The Granite Bay location is a major entertainment source for the Sac area. Just check out there on the weekend, and see how long it takes to get in. Get real!

    Flag
35. 135
    Name: Pamela Emick on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: The Granite Bay location is a major entertainment source for the Sac area. Just check out there on the weekend, and see how long it takes to get in. Get real!

    Flag
36. 136
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 137
    Name: Steve Irvine on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: It makes no sense to mine this area of the lake, given many, many available other sources of material in uninhabited areas. Inclusion at the last minute of this provision, was clearly intended to hide this from the public, and additional hearings and locat paper "notices" should be set up before any action is taken.

    Flag
38. 138
    Name: Mackensie Neptune on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 139
    Name: Nichole on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 140
    Name: Raedene Frederick on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: Please stop the destruction of Granite Bay's Shoreline!

    Flag
41. 141
    Name: Eric Seidman on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
42. 142
    Name: Rob Collins on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 143
    Name: Evan Wells on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 144
    Name: Alan King on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: This is a very bad idea. I strongly oppose this " Preferred Alternative" and would vote against it if given the opportunity.

    Flag
45. 145
    Name: Ronald A. Pozzi on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 146
    Name: Angela P. Pozzi on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 147
    Name: Marla Odegard on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
48. 148
    Name: Jeanine Stiles on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments: This would be devasting to our community and recreation. Please find another viable alternative to to the Flood Damage Reduction Plan.

    Flag
49. 149
    Name: Nazee Zahedi on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 150
    Name: Katy Hagman on Jul 12, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag

Page: « ‹ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »