Signatures 246 total
-
51
Name: Renee Bouck on Jul 10, 2007Comments: I moved to a neighborhood next to Folsom Lake because I felt confident that I would be spared the impact of unfettered development that has been so much of part of the experience of living in South Placer County. I can't believe that even a national park can be threatened by such agregious human intervention. This will impact the environment and quality of life for 10s of thousands of citizens who enjoy the natural beauty of this park. What do we pay taxes for This is another outrageous idea from bureaucracy out of touch with the people it is SUPPOSED to be serving.Flag
-
52
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
53
Name: Mike Briare on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Save our beaches.Flag
-
54
Name: Marc LaFitte on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
55
Name: Teri Hilburn on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
56
Name: William Battig on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
57
Name: Cynthia Chand on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
58
Name: Suzanne Ferroggiaro on Jul 10, 2007Comments: I am writing for 12 of our concerned family members. Surely there is another, better alternative!Flag
-
59
Name: Steve Shugart on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
60
Name: Ronald J. Oberlander on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
61
Name: Ronald J. Oberlander on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
62
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
63
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
64
Name: Paul Morlas on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Please dont take the beaches away from Folsom Lake!!!!!!!Flag
-
65
Name: Sheila Morlas on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Keep the sand where it is, do not remove, pleaseFlag
-
66
Name: Danelle Morlas on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Keep the sand there!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111Flag
-
67
Name: John Siebert on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Please keep Granite Bay beaches at Folsom Lake intact it is used by millions....Flag
-
68
Name: Berniece Siebert on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Keep our beaches at Folsom Lake!!!!!Flag
-
69
Name: Cindy Prather on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
70
Name: Bruce Seigel on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
71
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
72
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
73
Name: Lori Ryan on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
74
Name: Terry Ash on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
75
Name: Sheila Toner on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Too dangerous due to mineral (mercury - from gold mining past) contamanents and naturally occuring abestos to use this site for material. Also no need to deprive community of this recreational area for 10 years to improve the dam.Flag
-
76
Name: Stuart Bratton on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
77
Name: Shawn Holiday on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
78
Name: Richard Honnette on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
79
Name: Kathleen Congdon on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Our son was diagnosed with lymphoma while a student at Cavitt-Stallman Jr. High. With the high power lines going through the area, I believe the added assault to the environment of the asbestos and mercury will have a serious health risk for our children.Flag
-
80
Name: Mary W. Ellis on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
81
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
82
Name: Marjorie Krueger on Jul 10, 2007Comments: Please save the beaches on Folsom Lake at Granite Bay!! These beaches provide pleasure and recreation to thousands of people! There are other more appropriate sources of materials!Flag
-
83
Name: Nancy Mitchell on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
84
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments: I completely object to the use of our Granite Bay beaches in this manner. I ride my horses through this area and this would impact me greatly.Flag
-
85
Name: Susanne Munkdale on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
86
Name: Leslie Broadland on Jul 10, 2007Comments: We are demanding the Bureau of Reclamation remove Granite Bay beaches as the "Preferred Alternative" from their Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report "EIS/EIR" permanently and instead use another alternative sources of material provided in the report.Flag
-
87
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
88
Name: Stephen Israel on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
89
Name: Kerry Freitas on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
90
Name: Anonymous on Jul 10, 2007Comments:Flag
-
91
Name: Lisa Coons on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
92
Name: Teri Crisanty on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
93
Name: Tim Anderson on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
94
Name: Vince Underwood on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
95
Name: Roger Chan on Jul 11, 2007Comments: Putting the local residents (Granite Bay), and visitors to Folsom Lake in danger with this proposal is not acceptable. Please remove this "Preferred Alternative" from the Enviromental Impact Report.Flag
-
96
Name: John Webster on Jul 11, 2007Comments: Our children love the Granite bay beaches. It would be a criminal act to destroy our local environment in this wayFlag
-
97
Name: Lianne A. Peterson on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
98
Name: Nicole Ridgeway on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
99
Name: Anonymous on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag
-
100
Name: Michele Cracraft on Jul 11, 2007Comments:Flag