Stop the Destruction of Granite Bay's Shoreline!

Signatures 246 total

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »

1. 1
   Name: Ferd on Jun 30, 2007

   Comments: Great job!

   Flag
2. 2
   Name: Gina Campagna on Jun 30, 2007

   Comments: A primary reason that our family moved to Granite Bay was to be close to Folsom Lake for boating, biking and horseback riding. We do not want mining and excavation of the shoreline that will destroy our enjoyment of those activities or more importantly jeopodize our health.

   Flag
3. 3
   Name: Terry Bedwell on Jul 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
4. 4
   Name: Richard C. Grosch on Jul 1, 2007

   Comments: We spent our lives working hard to care for 4 children, 5 grand children and 5 1/2 great grand children. Richard spent over 36 years at Aero-jet and Midge over 30 years in Real Estate. Your project would distroy the rest of our peaceful lives.

   Flag
5. 5
   Name: Midge Grosch on Jul 1, 2007

   Comments: As my husband and I approch our 80's, we are proud of the fact that we have never had assestance from any give away programs State or Federal. We have earned our retirement here and we urge our government not to riun it for us.

   Flag
6. 6
   Name: Anonymous on Jul 1, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
7. 7
   Name: Danny Keller on Jul 2, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
8. 8
   Name: Karlie Pennington on Jul 2, 2007

   Comments:

   Flag
9. 9
   Name: Richard Nelson on Jul 3, 2007

   Comments: Please do not destroy the beaches below Mooney Ridge. These are the some of the best sand beaches on the whole lake and are use by many people from all over northen Calif. The project should get all materials off site not destroy existing natural resources.

   Flag
10. 10
    Name: Susan Potter on Jul 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
11. 11
    Name: Susan Potter on Jul 3, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
12. 12
    Name: Wesley Ruff on Jul 3, 2007

    Comments: Do not take this course of action and dredge up Folsom Lake! Sand for the levees can be taken from other sources. Not too mention the backwards ideology of destroying one area of water for another.

    Flag
13. 13
    Name: Karen Frazier-Roth on Jul 5, 2007

    Comments: SAVE OUR LAKE!!!

    Flag
14. 14
    Name: Scott Donaldson on Jul 5, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
15. 15
    Name: Bill Roush on Jul 6, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
16. 16
    Name: Shell Macpherson on Jul 6, 2007

    Comments: As a Granite Bay resident with family attending Cavitt Middle School and regular user of the recreational trails and beaches in the proposed borrow area, I am very much concerned with the proposed plan from and environmental impact as well as health concerns of disturbing aesbestos containing soil and rock.

    Flag
17. 17
    Name: Bernice Ericksmoen on Jul 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
18. 18
    Name: Richard Springs on Jul 7, 2007

    Comments: I will vote against anyone who supports this last minute insertion.

    Flag
19. 19
    Name: Suzanne Butcher on Jul 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
20. 20
    Name: Yuri And Irina Rocklin on Jul 7, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
21. 21
    Name: Sara Marie Cox on Jul 7, 2007

    Comments: If there were no other options and it was necessary for the safety of the many, then I would be selfish to oppose. However, if there are other options, it would selfish and negligent of the Bureau of Reclamation to proceed given the certain damage to the quality of life of many. Few things have given me the joy that trail utilization from Cavitt toward Granite Bay lake entrance has for well over a decade. It is a treasure to behold.

    Flag
22. 22
    Name: Larry D. Guyer, M.D. on Jul 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
23. 23
    Name: Amy Casias on Jul 8, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
24. 24
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 8, 2007

    Comments: Enough is enough - shoreline and access trails such as these must be left as is, not only for the public's enjoyment, but for the sheer continuity of our environment and its beauty. Placer County has given up too much open space. It's time to Just Say No!

    Flag
25. 25
    Name: Laura Funk on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
26. 26
    Name: Cynthia Warren on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments: While I understand the need for such a project, I don't understand why the excavation of material has to be mined in such a populated area. I do not believe that the gov't has fully explored or acknowledged the future impact of such a plan. Not only the health issues involved with our children, but also the destabalizing factors of the soils in regards to the homes perched on top of Mooney. I also have concerns about property value and traffic.

    Flag
27. 27
    Name: Florence Faoro on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments: I'm an avid horseback-rider, hiker, and general nature lover...GOOD GRIEF!!! Get your dirt somewhere else and leave this beautiful (although man-made) lake alone.

    Flag
28. 28
    Name: Jeff Jones on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
29. 29
    Name: Brian George on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments: The harm and permanent damage to Folsom Lakes shoreline can and will be detrimental to ours and other local business.

    Flag
30. 30
    Name: Genice Chochon on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
31. 31
    Name: Dina Angus on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments: Do not let anyone destroy the Folsom Lake beach!

    Flag
32. 32
    Name: Lori Wolfley on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
33. 33
    Name: Ron Wolfley on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
34. 34
    Name: Sarah Williams on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
35. 35
    Name: Linda Klinger on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
36. 36
    Name: Anonymous on Jul 9, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
37. 37
    Name: Karla Gustafson on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments: I believe that the current plan is a reckless course of action.

    Flag
38. 38
    Name: Jay Holmes on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
39. 39
    Name: Jeff DeBoer on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
40. 40
    Name: Craig Caplinger on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
41. 41
    Name: Jaede Miloslavich on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments: To have a project of this scope in one of the most used recreational areas of the Sacramento area is NOT a good idea. Destruction of one of the most beautiful natural environments is NOT a good idea. There are cost effective alternatives and they MUST be considered and stated as preferable.

    Flag
42. 42
    Name: Jocelyn Berry on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
43. 43
    Name: Lisa C. Renati-Towery on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
44. 44
    Name: Jenny/Art Lyon on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments: Please save our beaches and use commercially available sources of sand. This is a unique environment used by our residents, Scouts, families and joggers/walkers. It is an area rich with wildlife-please don't destroy it!

    Flag
45. 45
    Name: Rick Hamilton on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
46. 46
    Name: Lorrie Stevens on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
47. 47
    Name: Phil Johnson on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments: This is outrageous, expecially given these times of environmental awareness ands sensitivity. The community in and around GRanite Bay, who use these areas as our PRIMARY Recreational resource should not have this forced up on them.

    Flag
48. 48
    Name: Denise Zboralske on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
49. 49
    Name: William R. Bertrando on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments:

    Flag
50. 50
    Name: Colleen Israel on Jul 10, 2007

    Comments: Save our Beach!!!

    Flag

Page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 › »